International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Search results for

There are 33,160 results that match your search.33,160 results
  • The European Court of Justice (ECJ) has surprised much of the tax community in Europe with its decision against the taxpayer in the D case
  • Freedom of establishment – Cross-border merger – Refusal to register – Compatibility.
  • The EU's long-awaited Savings Tax Directive and the separate savings tax agreements with five other European countries, designed to combat tax fraud and increase cooperation on tax matters between EU countries, came into effect last Friday, July 1
  • UK shareholders face a £77 million ($135 million) tax bill following the restructuring of Shell Transport and Trading and Royal Dutch Petroleum to create a single company, Royal Dutch Shell
  • The government of Israel has introduced a bill that slashes corporate taxes and introduces a participation exemption regime
  • Mahyra Roy, former head of tax at KPMG in the UAE, has left the big-four firm. Roy, who moved out to the country from the London office, left the firm last week. KPMG has not announced a replacement.
  • Ernst & Young has announced a new financial services asset management tax practice in the US
  • Ed McClellan, Republican tax counsel to the US Senate Finance Committee, will join Alston & Bird as a partner in the firm's Washington, DC office on September 6
  • Philip Baker, QC, of Gray's Inn Tax Chambers in London, considers the pros and cons
  • Just as this issue was going to press on July 5, the ECJ released its decision in the eagerly-awaited D case (C-376/03) concerning Dutch net wealth tax and the free movement of capital under the EC Treaty. The court ruled that the treaty does not prevent a member state from denying a non-resident who has most of their wealth in the country where they live the allowances that they grant its own residents. The court also decided that the benefits of a tax treaty between two member states do not have to be extended to a third EU member.