International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Search results for

There are 33,160 results that match your search.33,160 results
  • Article 59 of the EC Treaty (now, after amendment, Article 49 EC) – Telecommunications services – Directive 90/388/EEC – Article 3c – Lifting of all restrictions – Municipal taxes on transmission pylons, masts and antennae for GSM.
  • Value added tax – Exemption of the management of special investment funds – Concept of management.
  • The Philippine Supreme Court has reinstated a controversial tax law that removes indirect tax exemptions and paves the way for a planned 2% rise in value-added tax
  • The Polish lower house has unanimously defeated the president's proposed veto over the 15% value-added tax (VAT) refund on construction materials
  • Nicholas DeNovio, former deputy chief counsel (technical) at the US Internal Revenue Service (IRS), has quit his job to move into private practice
  • The outsourcing of the HM Revenue and Custom's helpline service to call centre staff has caused ire among some taxpayers in the UK. Tax professionals have complained of unqualified call centre staff, delays and alienation of tax advisers and tax executives.
  • The French tax authorities have released provisional rules similar to the US and UK disclosure laws as part of Prime Minister Dominique de Villepin's tax reform drive
  • The House of Lords, the highest court in the UK, is likely to be asked to decide on two test cases concerning when companies should pay tax on profits after the Court of Session in Scotland ruled against a Scotch whisky distiller over the matter
  • Last Monday, KPMG in the US settled with the Department of the Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) for $456 million to prevent the firm's prosecution over tax shelters
  • Investment partnerships or professional partnerships that do not register their business domicile will have to pay the municipal tax in the district corresponding to the domicile recorded before the IRS.