Sean Foley Landon McGrew The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently issued an opinion, in Xilinx, Inc v CIR, No. 06-74246 (9th Circuit May 27 2009), holding that the arm's length standard described in the section 482 regulations does not apply to certain costs incurred in connection with cost sharing arrangements. Rather, the court held that the section 482 regulations in effect at the time the taxpayer's tax returns were filed required the sharing of all costs incurred in connection with cost sharing arrangements, even if such costs would not have been shared by unrelated parties acting at arm's length. The Xilinx decision reverses an earlier Tax Court case (Xilinx, Inc v CIR, 125 T.C. 37 (2005)) that held that such costs were not required to be shared under section 482. On August 12 2009, Xilinx filed a petition for rehearing to the ninth circuit, arguing that the court had improperly abandoned the arm's length standard.
August 31 2009