OECD
The controversial deal will allow US-parented groups to be carved out from key aspects of pillar two
The EU has seemingly capitulated to the US’s ‘side-by-side’ demands. This may be a win for the US, but the uncertainty has only just begun for pillar two
Foreign companies operating in Libya face source-based taxation even without a local presence. Multinationals must understand compliance obligations, withholding risks, and treaty relief to avoid costly surprises
In a post on X, Scott Bessent urged dissenting countries to the US/OECD side-by-side arrangement to ‘join the consensus’ to get a deal over the line
Sponsored
Sponsored
-
Sponsored by EY Asia-PacificLuis Coronado and Matt Andrew of EY unpick the OECD’s consultation documents related to tax certainty under pillar one and find that there are many unresolved issues in terms of tax dispute resolution.
-
Sponsored by EY Asia-PacificLuis Coronado and Matt Andrew of EY say policymakers still have many issues to resolve as debates continue over the technical and implementation-related elements of pillars one and two.
-
Sponsored by EY Asia-PacificThere is little time to waste as companies and tax departments prepare for the implementation of BEPS 2.0 at the start of 2024, report Albert Lee and Carina Ngai of EY.
Article list (load more 4 col) current tags