Taxing trusts when a settlor migrates to New Zealand

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Taxing trusts when a settlor migrates to New Zealand

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-russel-mcveagh.png
In the case of trusts, New Zealand operates what is known as a ‘settlor’ regime

Tim Stewart of Russell McVeagh explains how migrating settlors affect the taxation of trusts in New Zealand.

Amending legislation recently introduced in the New Zealand parliament proposes a number of amendments to the rules for how a trust is taxed when a settlor of the trust migrates to New Zealand. The proposed changes are a timely reminder that the rules applying to a trust when a settlor migrates to New Zealand are complex, and the application of those rules should be considered before the settlor arrives in New Zealand in order to avoid unexpected tax consequences.

Taxation of trusts under New Zealand law

New Zealand (like many jurisdictions) uses the concepts of residence and source to determine its jurisdiction to tax income and gains. A resident (for tax purposes) of New Zealand is subject to New Zealand tax on all income, wherever sourced. A non-resident is subject to New Zealand tax on income sourced from New Zealand. 

In the case of trusts, New Zealand operates what is known as a ‘settlor’ regime. To determine whether trust income (that is not taxable in the hands of a beneficiary) should be considered to be derived by a New Zealand tax resident (and therefore subject to tax), New Zealand looks to the tax residence of the settlor(s) not the tax residence of the trustee(s). 

The definition of ‘settlor’ for New Zealand income tax purposes is broad and includes any person who transfers value: (i) to the trust; or (ii) for the benefit of the trust; or (iii) on terms of the trust. There are also several deeming rules that expand the definition of ‘settlor’.

Trusts that do not have any New Zealand tax resident settlor are generally treated as ‘foreign trusts’. This generally has the consequence (provided certain disclosure requirements are met) that New Zealand income tax is imposed only on New Zealand-sourced income and distributions to New Zealand tax resident beneficiaries, even if the trustees are resident in New Zealand. 

If a settlor becomes New Zealand tax resident, however, that changes. From that point, the trust's worldwide income may be subject to New Zealand tax. 

Concessionary treatment may be available for migrating settlors

If a settlor of a foreign trust migrates to New Zealand (and becomes New Zealand tax resident), the trust (after a prescribed period) will automatically become a ‘non-complying trust’ unless certain elections are made. Distributions of New Zealand-sourced income and distributions to New Zealand tax resident beneficiaries from a non-complying trust are potentially subject to tax at the penal rate of 45%.




New Zealand's tax rules provide a concession under which a former foreign trust may be treated as a ‘complying trust’ if the necessary elections or disclosures are made within prescribed periods and New Zealand income tax obligations are satisfied (at the trustee rate of 33%) in respect of the relevant income. Distributions from complying trusts are not subject to further tax in the hands of beneficiaries. 



The proposed changes are intended to confirm (retrospectively) which elections and disclosures allow a former foreign trust to qualify for the concessionary treatment.



The bill containing the proposed changes is not expected to become law prior to New Zealand's general election on September 19 2020. 



Tim Stewart

T: +64 4 819 7527

E: tim.stewart@russellmcveagh.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The ruling excludes vacation and business development days from service PE calculations and confirms virtual services from abroad don’t count, potentially reshaping compliance for multinationals
User-friendly digital tax filing systems, transformative AI deployment, and the continued proliferation of DSTs will define 2026, writes Ascoria’s Neil Kelley
Case workers are ‘still not great’ but are making fewer enquiries, making the right decision more often and are more open to calls, ITR has heard
There is a shocking discrepancy between professional services firms’ parental leave packages. Those that fail to get with the times risk losing out in the war for talent
Winston Taylor is expected to launch in May 2026 with more than 1,400 lawyers across the US, UK, Europe, Latin America and the Middle East
They are alleging that leaked tax information ‘unfairly tarnished’ their business operations; in other news, Davis Polk and Eversheds Sutherland made key tax hires
Overall revenues for the combined UK and Swiss firm inched up 2% to £3.6 billion despite a ‘challenging market’
In the first of a two-part series, experts from Khaitan & Co dissect a highly anticipated Indian Supreme Court ruling that marks a decisive shift in India’s international tax jurisprudence
The OECD profile signals Brazil is no longer a jurisdiction where TP can be treated as a mechanical compliance exercise, one expert suggests, though another highlights 'significant concerns'
Libya’s often-overlooked stamp duty can halt payments and freeze contracts, making this quiet tax a decisive hurdle for foreign investors to clear, writes Salaheddin El Busefi
Gift this article