Emin Toro joins list of pending US Tax Court judges

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Emin Toro joins list of pending US Tax Court judges

White House large

President Donald Trump on Tuesday nominated Emin Toro for the US Tax Court, where high-profile transfer pricing cases such as Coca-Cola's $3 billion challenge are awaiting trial.

The US tax community is eagerly awaiting the approval of four US Tax Court judgeships.

The latest nomination, published by the White House on Tuesday, proposed Emin Toro as US Tax Court judge. If confirmed, Toro will bring significant experience in transfer pricing controversy and advance pricing agreements (APA) to the US Tax Court.

Washington DC-based Toro was appointed partner in 2008 by Covington & Burley, where he advised on cross-border transfer pricing, international assets transfers, tax optimisation and M&A. His tax controversy experience includes audits, administrative appeals and litigation. Most recently he worked on Bacardi’s acquisition of Patron Spirits International.

In October 2017, Toro was nominated to the American College of Tax Counsel, a professional association of tax lawyers. Previously he worked as a clerk for Justice Clarence Thomas of the US Supreme Court and Judge Karen LeCraft Henderson of the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit.

He is a frequent public speaker on tax and transfer pricing topics, including lectures on ‘Why tax reform and transfer pricing are keeping tax directors awake at night’ and the ‘Impact of BEPS on APAs and Dispute Resolutions’.

US Tax Court

Toro joins three already pending candidates, Courtney Dunbar Jones, Patrick Urda and Elizabeth Ann Copeland. Copeland’s nomination was refreshed by Donald Trump after already having been nominated by former President Barack Obama’s term. US Tax Court judges serve for 15 year terms.

In the past, the US Tax Court in Washington DC has rejected many of the IRS’ arguments in transfer pricing cases and found that the tax authority had on several occasions acted arbitrarily.

In 2016, the court ruled in favour of Medtronic for the company’s use of the comparable profits method and royalty payments from its Puerto Rican subsidiary. The high-stake ruling has been appealed by the IRS and will be heard in the Eighth Court of Appeals.

In the Tax Court, several other important cases are slated for 2018, such as Coca-Cola’s challenge of the IRS’s request for $3 billion in back taxes.  

 



more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The climbdowns pave the way for a side-by-side deal to be concluded this week, as per the US Treasury secretary’s expectation; in other news, Taft added a 10-partner tax team
A vote to be held in 2026 could create Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, a $3.6bn giant with 3,100 lawyers across the Americas, EMEA and Asia Pacific
Foreign companies operating in Libya face source-based taxation even without a local presence. Multinationals must understand compliance obligations, withholding risks, and treaty relief to avoid costly surprises
Hotel La Tour had argued that VAT should be recoverable as a result of proceeds being used for a taxable business activity
Tax professionals are still going to be needed, but AI will make it easier than starting from zero, EY’s global tax disputes leader Luis Coronado tells ITR
AI and assisting clients with navigating global tax reform contributed to the uptick in turnover, the firm said
In a post on X, Scott Bessent urged dissenting countries to the US/OECD side-by-side arrangement to ‘join the consensus’ to get a deal over the line
A new transatlantic firm under the name of Winston Taylor is expected to go live in May 2026 with more than 1,400 lawyers and 20 offices
As ITR’s exclusive data uncovers in-house dissatisfaction with case management, advisers cite Italy’s arcane tax rules
The new guidance is not meant to reflect a substantial change to UK law, but the requirement that tax advice is ‘likely to be correct’ imposes unrealistic expectations
Gift this article