Update on Italian regional tax on productive activities brings clarity

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Update on Italian regional tax on productive activities brings clarity

Before 2014, IRAP (the Italian regional tax on productive activities) regulations gave rise to some interpretative difficulties when transfer pricing issues were involved, especially during tax audits and assessments.

It must be noted that the provision on transfer pricing documentation currently in force, namely article 26 of Decree-Law No. 78/2010, only refers to article 1 of Legislative Decree No. 471 of December 18, 1997, omitting any reference to article 32 of Legislative Decree No. 446 of December 15, 1997, the so-called IRAP Decree.

Further, Law No. 244 of December 24 2007 (the 2008 Financial Act) amended the IRAP Decree, which became effective on January 18 2008, by introducing the “principle of direct derivation” whereby the IRAP tax base is derived directly from profits as indicated in the statutory financial statements.

The objective of these regulatory changes is to make the computation of the IRAP tax base better adhere to the criteria adopted in national accounting for the calculation of production value and value added across various economic sectors.

In light of these changes, since 2008, transfer pricing regulations (as per article 110, paragraph 7 of the Income Tax Code) were irrelevant for IRAP calculation purposes.

Indeed, because of the repeal of article 11-bis of the IRAP Decree, the positive and negative components of income derive directly from the figures in the statutory financial statements and are no longer subject to the rules on corporate income mandated by the TUIR.

However, an amendment to the Stability Law approved on December 23 2013 has now introduced a specific provision whereby “article 110, paragraph 7 of the Income Tax Code has to be applied to the calculation of the net turnover for IRAP purposes also for years subsequent to those ongoing on December 31st, 2007”.

Therefore, IRAP is fully applicable to the higher taxable amounts deriving from a transfer pricing audit. However, penalties envisaged by article 1, paragraph 2 of Legislative Decree n. 471/1997 (from 100% to 200% of the higher taxes due) will not be applied to audits on years between the one ongoing on December 31 2007 and the year for which at the time of the approval of the legislative decree the tax return can still be filed (unless penalties have been already definitively charged before December 31 2013, in which case they remain applicable).

Since the legislative decree will be effective from January 1 2014, this means that for companies with calendar financial statements, penalties on IRAP won’t be applied for years 2007 to 2012.

By Piergiorgio Valente, managing partner of Valente Associati GEB Partners

Valente Associati GEB Partners

Viale Bianca Maria, 45

20122 Milan, Italy

Managing Partner: Piergiorgio Valente

Tel: +39 02 7626131

Fax: +39 02 76001091

Email: p.valente@gebnetwork.it

Website: www.gebpartners.it

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

While pillar two has been enacted on paper in Brazil, companies are encountering a range of practical compliance issues, ITR has heard
Moore, founding partner of the Chicago tax boutique which bears her name, shares her career wisdom for ITR’s new Women in Tax interview series
But partners at the firm admit that jumping ship to the US would not be as easy as some believe
Governments are rewriting tax policy for the AI era, deploying digital taxes, tailored incentives and algorithmic enforcement that redefine where value is created
Wingrove will succeed Bill Thomas, who has served in the role since 2017; in other news, Andersen unveiled a sharp increase in revenues for 2025
Partners are divided on Italy vs PDM D’s analytical depth, evidentiary standards, and what the judgment signals for future intra-group financing cases
As GCCs increasingly become strategic hubs, multinationals face heightened risks around permanent establishment and place of effective management
While all options presented ‘drawbacks’, European Commission tax leader Wopke Hoekstra said the controversial US carve-out deal has ‘many benefits’
From tech preparations to competitiveness concerns, Tax Systems’ Russell Gammon addresses the most pressing client considerations arising from the SbS deal
Despite estimates that the US/OECD agreement will cost countries billions, the Fair Tax Foundation’s Paul Monaghan believes the deal is a ‘necessary evil’
Gift this article