Paying tax by instalment and ID numbers

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Paying tax by instalment and ID numbers

On May 30 2003 Law 10,684 introducing modifications to the tax instalment programme for Brazilian taxpayers was enacted. The general rules set forth in Law 10,684 can be summarized as follows.

  • Brazilian taxpayers will have the option to pay their tax liabilities (in arrears) with the federal tax authorities divided in up to 180 monthly payments. The monthly payments will be subject to the Brazilian long-term interest rate.

    • The monthly tax payment may not be inferior to (subject to certain exceptions):

    • 1.5% of the taxpayer's monthly gross income for the month prior to the payment; or

  • R$2,000 ($700) - for legal entities.

The main federal taxes included in the tax instalment programme are as follows:

  • corporate income tax (IRPJ);

  • social contribution on net income (CSLL);

  • contribution to the employees' profit participation programme (PIS);

  • tax for social security financing (COFINS);

  • excise tax (IPI); and

  • import tax (II).

Brazilian taxpayers will have up to the last working day of July 2003 to enter into the new programme and federal tax liabilities of up to February 28 2003 would be included in the tax instalment programme.

Tax identification numbers

As with Normative Instruction 200, non-resident companies owning goods and rights in Brazil, subject to public registration, are obliged to apply for and obtain a federal taxpayer identification number - known as the Cadastro Nacional da Pessoa Jurídica (CNPJ). The mentioned assets include:

  • real property;

  • vessels;

  • equity investment in Brazilian companies;

  • investment in the financial market;

  • vehicles;

  • aircraft;

  • bank accounts; and

  • investment in the capital market.

The regulations expressly mentioned that ownership of intellectual properties (such as trademarks and patents) would not require the non-resident entity to obtain a federal taxpayer identification number.

On May 5 2003, Normative Instruction 312 (NI 312) was enacted, providing further details and clarification about the new requirements for legal foreign entities domiciled outside Brazil to obtain a taxpayer identification number. The general rules set forth in NI 312 can be summarized as follows:

  • for depository receipts issued abroad, which are guaranteed based on the value of securities with specific custody in Brazil, the foreign investors are no longer subject to registration with the tax authorities; and

  • foreign investors will have, from now on, 180 days after the funds entered the country to obtain the tax identification number (initially, the foreign investors had to obtain the tax identification number prior to the entry of funds into the country).

Nélio B Weiss (nelio.weiss@br.pwc.com) and Philippe Jeffrey (philippe.jeffrey@br.pwc.com), São Paulo

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

While rarely the sole driver of a combination, tax is becoming an increasingly important part of firms' efforts to keep up with client expectations
New research, which suggests LLMs can silently corrupt complex documents, should alert tax and legal teams relying on AI to handle iterative drafting and compliance workflows
Maintaining increased funding for HMRC is a ‘high possibility’ if he becomes PM, ITR has also heard
Awards
ITR is delighted to reveal all the shortlisted nominees for the 2026 Europe Tax Awards
The firm has hired a team of private client lawyers from Withers to launch in New York and Connecticut, though ITR analysis suggests it faces stiff competition
The ability of tax authorities to receive and analyse data is becoming ‘quite advanced’, warns Stuart Lang, head of EY’s compliance co-sourcing solution
The Court of Appeal ruling clarifies that treaty benefits are not abusive where transactions are commercially driven, providing greater certainty on “main purpose” anti-avoidance tests
Despite the Netherlands featuring an unusual concentration of World Tax-ranked technology-led providers, sources believe there’s a long way to go to challenge the established players
Ethics seems to be playing a subservient role to an entitlement culture borne out of a pervasive ‘revenue at all costs’ mentality at the big four
Historical World Tax data suggests the ‘largest law firm merger in history’ may not pose a serious threat to the world's leading tax practices
Gift this article