Three-year transition announced for IFRS and thin capitalization

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Three-year transition announced for IFRS and thin capitalization

The International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) came into effect in Australia on January 1 2005. It was clear some time ago that these new accounting standards would impact directly on Australia's thin-capitalization rules, which seek to limit interest expense deductions for certain taxpayers that exceed certain debt-to-asset ratios. This is because the thin-capitalization safe harbour calculation is made with reference to accounts prepared in accordance with Australian accounting standards.

On January 24 2005 the federal treasurer announced a three-year transitional period for the purposes of the thin-capitalization rules. The treasurer indicated that "during the transitional period, taxpayers will be able to undertake their safe harbour calculation using the Australian General Accepted Accounting Principles as they existed pre-January 1 2005."

The announcement advised that the transitional period would provide sufficient time for the government to examine whether the existing thin-capitalization rules are appropriate following the adoption of IFRS.

Most taxpayers assess their thin-capitalization position on the basis of the safe harbour debt test. This rule allows taxpayers a debt-to-asset ratio of up to 75%. Where a taxpayer exceeds this ratio, a portion of their interest expense deductions is denied unless they can satisfy the worldwide gearing test or the arm's-length test.

It would appear from the announcement that continuing to use the pre-January 1 2005 standards for the purpose of Australia's thin-capitalization rules will be optional rather than compulsory, although this is not entirely clear from the words of the announcement which we have quoted above.

There had been concerns expressed by industry and the professions that the effect of IFRS would be to reduce reported net assets by Australian reporting entities. This is principally due to new rules under IFRS which generally do not permit the revaluation of intangibles, require more rigorous impairment testing of assets, and require the recognition of derivatives as well as the booking of defined benefit superannuation plan shortfalls.

Peter Collins (peter.collins@au.pwc.com), Melbourne

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Mada has opened simultaneously in Paris and Dubai with an eight-lawyer team from Trinity International
PwC will continue to provide indirect tax services as part of the deal; in other news, the CJEU addressed the VAT treatment of TP adjustments
The arrival of Renan Ozturk and his team from A&M Tax introduces a unique proposition within the Middle East legal market, the firm said
The deal, reportedly worth $400m, will add Svalner Atlas’s 50-partner Nordic and Benelux presence to Ryan’s rapidly growing global footprint
The combined firm, which comprises over 1,400 lawyers, will boast robust tax practices in both the UK and US
Cascading tax reform, bullish foreign investment and vigorous TP audits have made Italy’s tax advisory market dynamic and stiffly competitive
As ITR data reveals that 2025 saw more than double the amount of private client hires than 2024, it seems firms are jostling for position
The US multinational paid 20% more tax in 2025 than 2024, it said; in other news, more than 25,000 HMRC staff have been upskilled on AI
Belt and Road Initiative countries face tax incentive conundrums due to pillar two, but relatively few countries would seek to scrap the project, ITR has heard
Hany Elnaggar examines how the OECD’s global minimum tax is reshaping the GCC’s investment incentive landscape, shifting the region from rate-based competition toward substance-driven economic positioning
Gift this article