Germany: Tax risks for management

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Germany: Tax risks for management

rossel.jpg

Carsten Rössel

As in other countries, company directors are under duties of due care, both towards the tax authorities for ensuring that tax liability is correctly declared and towards the shareholders for ensuring that taxes are not overpaid. This latter includes penalties for under or late reporting, so that, at this level, the two duties are not in conflict. However, the current discussion on aggressive tax planning along with the recent tightening of the provisions governing exemption from criminal penalties for tax wrong-doers coming forward of their own volition has encouraged tax auditors to see tax avoidance attempts in estimates or assumptions which they consider to be unfounded. The high cost of refuting such accusations can appear to shareholders as an avoidable expense. The answer is for the directors to protect themselves and their company with an appropriate tax risk management system. This encompasses a complete schedule of all tax filing and payment deadlines together with appropriate backups to ensure compliance in the event of unexpected absence of the individuals responsible. It also includes a complete register of all known tax risks, the measures taken to identify and contain them and full documentation of the position to be taken in the company's defence. This documentation should explain in full the reasons for the position taken. In many ways it is similar to that required under the transfer pricing rules, although it does not demand the same degree of formality. Of particular importance is the establishment of a clear division of duties within top management. Naturally, the system must be monitored.

It should also be realised that outsourcing functions does not absolve management of its compliance duties. This particularly applies to accounting (in agreement with the tax office) and other functions assumed by group shared service centres as these are almost invariably not covered by any form of professional liability insurance.

Carsten Rössel (carsten.roessel@de.pwc.com)
PwC

Tel: +49 211 981-7141

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Pillar two compliance is creating unprecedented data demands for multinational tax departments, making closer collaboration with FP&A teams essential for accurate reporting and audit readiness
Among the arrivals is Andrew Howell, who leaves scandal-hit PwC Australia after representing PepsiCo in a high-profile TP dispute
ITR's podcast examines whether the big four have overarching cultural issues and assesses the competitive threat of technology-backed transfer pricing firms
The UK advisory firm has seen its global revenues expand by £27.2m following its listing and acquisition of Baker Tilly South-East Europe
Tax-trained John Sams, previously the firm’s CFO and COO, was appointed after a rigorous process, KPMG said
From Mauritius substance rules to Kenyan SEP tax and South African anti-avoidance measures, businesses must navigate growing scrutiny of cross-border IP structures in Africa
ITR spoke to multinationals, advisers and software providers about a June 30 deadline defined by faulty portals, high compliance costs and hard lessons
After years of onerous pillar two prep, businesses will be galled in seeing tax revenues outweighed by compliance costs
Tax advisers should revisit India secondment arrangements after the EY US ruling strengthened the Centrica precedent and raised fresh withholding concerns
Despite the shortfall, effective tax rates of multinationals have seen a ‘statistically significant rise’
Gift this article