Spain: New tax measures affecting holdings in subsidiaries

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Spain: New tax measures affecting holdings in subsidiaries

fernandez.jpg

Pedro Fernandez

The Spanish Parliament has enacted new tax measures which will have a significant impact on the way Spanish companies have traditionally structured their investments via holdings in domestic or foreign subsidiaries. For many years Spain has been one of the few OECD jurisdictions that allows companies to take a tax deduction for the impairment of their shareholdings in subsidiaries. Although historically the deduction required the impairment of the holding to be recorded in the investor's books, this requirement was eliminated in 2008 for holdings in companies qualifying as group entities, jointly controlled entities or affiliates. In these cases the deduction, in the form of a book-to-tax adjustment, was tied to the mere reduction of the amount of equity in the subsidiary, as adjusted by (1) those expenses which were not regarded as tax deductible under the Spanish CIT Law, and (2) in the case of holdings in foreign companies, the result of re-computing the reduction in equity in accordance with Spanish GAAP.

The complexity of the two adjustments, particularly in groups with operations in multiple jurisdictions and sophisticated corporate structures, has converted this deduction into one of the most contentious areas between the Tax Administration and taxpayers. In addition, the deduction has enabled Spanish businesses to significantly reduce their corporate income tax payments. Possibly with a view to curbing these two effects, the government has proposed and the parliament has approved the elimination of this deduction. Logically, in the interest of neutrality, it has also established that losses incurred by foreign permanent establishments (PEs) will not be deductible either.

The removal of this deduction is going to affect the valuation of projects where there are multiple investors, none of whom holds a stake of more than 75% in the venture. This is the minimum threshold generally required to qualify for tax group consolidation and, where it is possible, it is certainly the most straightforward way to enjoy the tax shelter that net operating losses naturally provide.

Where that threshold is not present, which is usually the case in joint ventures, the challenge is how to optimise the use of tax losses. In other jurisdictions, this is traditionally achieved through the use of tax transparent vehicles, or entities that can be disregarded for tax purposes, in which the losses flow proportionally to the investors.

We do not currently enjoy such look-through entities in Spain, other than a form of unlimited liability partnership known as a sociedad civil which, on the other hand, is not legally designed to carry on a trade (indeed, there is some controversy about whether the sociedad civil can maintain its tax look-through status when it engages in a trade) or some special forms of agreements suitable for certain limited activities for the benefit of their members or for businesses that come together to carry out a certain project, typically of a temporary nature, such as construction work.

Where the project is located outside Spain, the challenge is even bigger – almost insurmountable – where the trade would create a PE abroad since the losses attributable to the PE will not be deductible under the new regulations. This is, undoubtedly, a matter to be carefully reviewed.

Pedro Fernandez (pedro.fernandez@garrigues.com)

Garrigues Taxand

Tel: +34 91 514 52 00

Website: www.garrigues.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

A 120-plus-day delay to refunds would cost taxpayers almost $3bn in additional interest, the Cato Institute warned; plus indirect tax updates from February
The Office for Budget Responsibility’s pessimistic pillar two forecast accompanied the UK chancellor’s muted Spring Statement, dubbed ‘as dull as possible’ by one adviser
Digital tax reform is dissolving the old ‘temporal buffer’, forcing systems, institutions, and professionals to adapt as real-time reporting reshapes governance, capability, and compliance
Our first instalment features analysis of Deloitte’s landmark EMEA merger, Donald Trump’s Supreme Court tariff showdown and Venezuela’s tax evolution
While some believe it could have a positive effect on the wider advisory landscape, others argue that HMRC’s ‘red tape’ exercise won’t deter bad actors
The political optics of the US’s carve-out deal are poor, but as the Fair Tax Foundation’s Paul Monaghan writes, it preserves pillar two’s guiding ethos
The big four firm reportedly sent ‘threatening’ correspondence to Unity Advisory over its hiring of ex-PwC partners; plus tax recruitment news from the week
Tom Goldstein, who was represented by US law firm Munger, Tolles & Olson, denied wilfully cheating on his taxes and blamed errors on his staff
Multinationals face rising TP scrutiny as global rules diverge. As Daniel Moalusi argues, strong, consistent documentation is now essential to minimise audit risk and protect tax positions
The profession is fundamentally restructuring itself around what tax and accounting work should be, a Thomson Reuters leader told ITR
Gift this article