Switzerland: Impact of EU transparency directive on country-by-country reporting for Swiss businesses

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Switzerland: Impact of EU transparency directive on country-by-country reporting for Swiss businesses

mcneil.jpg

drye.jpg

David McNeil


Sarah Drye

In April 2013, the Irish presidency of the EU secured agreement on a new accounting directive to increase the transparency of payments made to governments by European companies involved in extractive and forestry industries. The proposals will amend the Transparency Directive (2004/109/EC) to require country-by-country reporting on payments made to governments including, among others, taxes on profit, licence fees and royalties.

While EU directives are not directly applicable to Switzerland, they are often taken into account by Swiss lawmakers when considering changes to Swiss law. Existing transparency initiatives – including the Dodd-Frank Act and the voluntary Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) – have attracted interest in the Swiss Federal Parliament and debate has already begun on the introduction of equivalent laws in Switzerland, most recently in the form of a parliamentary motion proposed on June 11.

Of particular interest for Swiss businesses is the scope of the Swiss initiative, which could impact companies trading extracted natural resources as well as those involved in the primary extraction itself.

Regardless of the final scope of any Swiss legal obligation in this area, it is likely that the pressure to improve transparency around tax will be felt by a much wider population of businesses as politicians, non-government organisations and increasingly the wider media, turn the spotlight on the contribution of multinationals to the economies of the countries in which they operate.

Compliance with transparency initiatives will have wide implications for processes and systems, particularly for those multinational groups who decentralise responsibility for tax, as is common for Swiss-based organisations.

For certain businesses, the requirement to report more information on taxes is likely to become an obligation. For others, additional voluntary disclosure could be a strategic choice in demonstrating commitment to conducting their tax affairs in a socially responsible manner.

David McNeil (damcneil@deloitte.ch)

Tel: +41 (0)58 279 8193
Sarah Drye (sdrye@deloitte.ch)

Tel: +41 (0) 58 279 8091

Deloitte

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

A company risks double taxation, penalties and inquiry cost if it submits a form with anomalies under the new system, Asker Ali also tells ITR
Arindam Mitra and Robin Hart examine how aggregate TP rules clash with transaction-level customs rules, creating compliance risks and requiring granular, SKU-level pricing strategies
The scandal has come just three years after the PwC tax leaks controversy and has prompted KPMG’s Australian chief executive to resign
In the first of a two-part series on capital v revenue in R&D, Jayne Stokes explores these key concepts and where UK companies need to tread carefully
Magnus Pantzar is set to join as managing director after spending nearly a decade as EQT’s global head of tax
The OECD’s project was up for debate as Matt Williams spoke to ITR following BDO’s tax strategist survey, which uncovered increased complexity and costs among multinationals
The recent spree of firm mergers and acquisitions proves that geographic scale is the name of the game
The big four spin-off firm becomes Taxand’s second UK member; in other news, Haynes Boone launched a UK tax practice
Stephanie Pantelidaki’s economic expertise will give Norton Rose Fulbright’s other teams ‘extra firepower,’ she says
Mada has opened simultaneously in Paris and Dubai with an eight-lawyer team from Trinity International
Gift this article