Deferred taxes related to foreign interest – what you should consider under IAS 12

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Deferred taxes related to foreign interest – what you should consider under IAS 12

fotoflexer-photodeferredtaxes.jpg

Investing in subsidiaries, branches or associates, as well as having interest in a joint venture, would trigger some consequences from a deferred tax standpoint.

These consequences are:

  • The existence of undistributed profits of subsidiaries, branches, associates and joint ventures;

  • Differences in foreign exchange rates when a parent and its subsidiary are based in different countries; and

  • A reduction in the book value of an investment (the application of the accounting method of fair value under IFRS 9 may result in a reduction of the book value of an investment)

From an International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) perspective, particularly International Accounting Standard (IAS)-12 – Income Taxes -, these items may cause a difference between the book value (either individual or consolidated) of the investment and its tax base (typically the original cost of the equity).

This temporary difference is known as outside basis and is given in the tax jurisdiction of the parent company, for example, in case of having a distribution of profits from a foreign investment, a tax liability should arise for the parent entity.

Even so, IAS -12 includes some cases by which the tax liability may not be recognised by the parent entity when:

  • the parent or investor is able to control the timing of the reversal of the temporary difference; and

  • it is probable that the temporary difference will not be reversed in the near future.

In this regard, a detailed analysis is required by all consolidation levels in a group to conclude if the parent entity must recognise a tax liability for outside basis in its financial statements.

Taking this into account, different perspectives may be found between US-GAAP [Generally Accepted Accounting Principles] and IFRS when the outside basis is analysed. For instance:

From a US-GAAP perspective, the outside basis is focused on undistributed profits, and the only exception to recognising a deferred tax liability in the parent company is to demonstrate a higher income tax rate in the foreign country where the subsidiary (which distributes the profit) is located. A full tax credit for the income tax paid abroad may be applied by the parent company therefore.

From an IFRS perspective a deeper analysis must be done to conclude if the outside basis may cause a deferred tax asset or a deferred tax liability. Some items under analysis are, in the case of a deferred tax liability to demonstrate:

  • that the parent company has effective control of the dividends policy upon the subsidiaries; and

  • the dividends will not be distributed in the foreseeable future.

In the case of a deferred tax asset:

  • to demonstrate http://bit.ly/15sL2oFenough taxable income in future years.

In the case of having a deferred tax asset related to outside temporary differences, further analysis must be done to come to a conclusion regarding its recognition in the financial statements. This analysis includes basically the ability of the parent entity to generate future taxable income.

Lessons

  • The outside basis conclusion may be different from a US-GAAP perspective concerning IFRS –IAS-12.

  • This analysis should be made from bottom to top of all consolidation levels to have full documentation regarding foreign interest, including full control in the parent company upon undistributed dividends in all subsidiaries, and joint ventures.

José Abraján (jose.abrajan@mx.ey.com), Senior Manager – Tax Accounting, EY Mexico

Guadalupe García (guadalupe.garcia@mx.ey.com), Senior – Tax Accounting, EY Mexico

Gustavo Gómez (gustavo.gomez@mx.ey.com), Partner – Corporate Taxes, EY Mexico

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

A 120-plus-day delay to refunds would cost taxpayers almost $3bn in additional interest, the Cato Institute warned; plus indirect tax updates from February
The Office for Budget Responsibility’s pessimistic pillar two forecast accompanied the UK chancellor’s muted Spring Statement, dubbed ‘as dull as possible’ by one adviser
Digital tax reform is dissolving the old ‘temporal buffer’, forcing systems, institutions, and professionals to adapt as real-time reporting reshapes governance, capability, and compliance
Our first instalment features analysis of Deloitte’s landmark EMEA merger, Donald Trump’s Supreme Court tariff showdown and Venezuela’s tax evolution
While some believe it could have a positive effect on the wider advisory landscape, others argue that HMRC’s ‘red tape’ exercise won’t deter bad actors
The political optics of the US’s carve-out deal are poor, but as the Fair Tax Foundation’s Paul Monaghan writes, it preserves pillar two’s guiding ethos
The big four firm reportedly sent ‘threatening’ correspondence to Unity Advisory over its hiring of ex-PwC partners; plus tax recruitment news from the week
Tom Goldstein, who was represented by US law firm Munger, Tolles & Olson, denied wilfully cheating on his taxes and blamed errors on his staff
Multinationals face rising TP scrutiny as global rules diverge. As Daniel Moalusi argues, strong, consistent documentation is now essential to minimise audit risk and protect tax positions
The profession is fundamentally restructuring itself around what tax and accounting work should be, a Thomson Reuters leader told ITR
Gift this article