Ukraine: Treaties and transfer pricing developments

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Ukraine: Treaties and transfer pricing developments

kotenko.jpg

kalyta.jpg

Vladimir Kotenko


Iryna Kalyta

Ukraine signs a double tax treaty with Malta

On September 4 2013, Ukraine and Malta signed a double tax treaty. The treaty allows reducing withholding tax to 5% on dividends and to 10% on interest and royalties (conditions apply). The treaty will enter into force upon the exchange of ratification instruments and its provisions will apply from January 1 of the year following its entry into force.

New Ukrainian transfer pricing rules came into force

Starting September 1 2013, new transfer pricing rules finally became effective in Ukraine.

New regulations will apply to controlled transactions both for corporate profit tax and VAT purposes.

New transfer pricing rules introduced basic rules of functional and comparability analysis. Five methods, including comparable uncontrolled price, resale minus, cost plus, transactional net margin and profit split would be used for determining the arm's-length price for controlled transactions.

Controlled transactions for transfer pricing purposes will cover not only cross-border related party transactions, but also, in some cases, domestic related party transactions and even transactions with unrelated parties (for example located in low tax jurisdictions). The list of low tax jurisdictions will be adopted by the Ukrainian government. The annual threshold for controlled transactions is UAH50 million ($6.2 million).

An obligation to file transfer pricing reporting has been introduced. Transfer pricing documentation will have to be provided at the request of the tax authority. The first reporting period covers September to December 2013, and the first transfer pricing report is due by May 2014. Failure to report or to provide documentation will attract a prohibitive fine of 5% of the value of controlled transactions.

There will be a grace period on penalties for violation of transfer pricing rules from September 2013 to September 2014, but this grace period will not apply to penalties for failure to file the report or to provide documentation.

Although introduction of these more extensive transfer pricing rules is viewed as a positive development aimed at bringing Ukraine closer to OECD principles, many important matters are yet to be resolved. The government is expected to adopt secondary regulations explaining the new rules.

Vladimir Kotenko (vladimir.kotenko@ua.ey.com) and Iryna Kalyta (iryna.kalyta@ua.ey.com)

EY

Tel: +380 44 490 3000

Fax: +380 44 490 3030

Website: www.ey.com/ua

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

As the firm embarks on a major shakeup of its EMEA partnerships, some staff will be watching nervously
The buyout of Hucke and Associates continues Ryan’s streak of firm acquisitions; in other news, a UK appeal against VAT on private school fees was dismissed
Tax teams are responding to usual client demand in the region, albeit with increased working from home flexibility, local sources indicate
A 120-plus-day delay to refunds would cost taxpayers almost $3bn in additional interest, the Cato Institute warned; plus indirect tax updates from February
The Office for Budget Responsibility’s pessimistic pillar two forecast accompanied the UK chancellor’s muted Spring Statement, dubbed ‘as dull as possible’ by one adviser
Digital tax reform is dissolving the old ‘temporal buffer’, forcing systems, institutions, and professionals to adapt as real-time reporting reshapes governance, capability, and compliance
Our first instalment features analysis of Deloitte’s landmark EMEA merger, Donald Trump’s Supreme Court tariff showdown and Venezuela’s tax evolution
While some believe it could have a positive effect on the wider advisory landscape, others argue that HMRC’s ‘red tape’ exercise won’t deter bad actors
The political optics of the US’s carve-out deal are poor, but as the Fair Tax Foundation’s Paul Monaghan writes, it preserves pillar two’s guiding ethos
The big four firm reportedly sent ‘threatening’ correspondence to Unity Advisory over its hiring of ex-PwC partners; plus tax recruitment news from the week
Gift this article