How VAT could help developing countries’ tax collection problems

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

How VAT could help developing countries’ tax collection problems

h-o-parl.jpg

Efforts to replace aid to poor countries with tax as a more stable source of revenue have almost entirely focussed on the corporate sector. But a UK International Development Committee meeting in Parliament saw an interesting debate emerge on the role of VAT.

Mick Moore, professorial fellow at the Institute of Development Studies, pointed to research that suggests aid is the most unstable source of public revenue for developing countries, while tax is the most stable. Few in the tax justice movement are in disagreement with this stance, however his ideas on how best to collect this revenue proved more controversial.

“Don’t be sidetracked by the allegedly regressive nature of VAT,” said Moore, arguing that because a large number of products are zero-rated, it is not clear that the tax is as regressive as some suggest.

Moore pointed out that almost all developing countries have adopted VAT because it is an efficient way of raising revenue.

“I would not remove such an effective mechanism,” said Moore.

Tim Besley, school professor of Economics and Political Science at the London School of Economics, argued that VAT has considerable benefits in administration.

Because companies deduct VAT, acting as tax collectors for the authorities, it means they formalise their accounts with the government.

“It has the benefit of building a broad-based tax,” said Besley.

Besley’s argument is compelling where there may be many smaller companies that have not registered as corporate taxpayers in developing countries and, as a long-term revenue raiser, it may be effective in bringing more companies into the tax system.

Speaking to International Tax Review after the meeting, however, Savior Mwambwa, executive director of the Centre for Trade Policy and Development, argued that poor countries need to look at the most effective short-term ways of raising revenue.

“Governments have to focus their energy on big multinational companies,” said Mwambwa. “This is easier to do because they’re already registered and licensed.”

Mwambwa argued that because the multinationals are already on the system, even if they are shifting their profits to tax havens, governments can chase them for the taxes they owe and use the money to build the capacity of tax administrations.

More than 70% of African countries have now adopted a VAT, and it increasingly seems to be the tax of choice for states across the continent looking to generate extra revenue, because it is a hard tax to avoid.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

In looking at the impact of taxation, money won't always be all there is to it
Australia’s Tax Practitioners Board is set to kick off 2026 with a new secretary to head the administrative side of its regulatory activities.
Ireland’s Department of Finance reported increased income tax, VAT and corporation tax receipts from 2024; in other news, it’s understood that HSBC has agreed to pay the French treasury to settle a tax investigation
The Australian Taxation Office believes the Swedish furniture company has used TP to evade paying tax it owes
Supermarket chain Morrisons is facing a £17 million ($23 million) tax bill; in other news, Donald Trump has cut proposed tariffs
The controversial deal will allow US-parented groups to be carved out from key aspects of pillar two
Awards
ITR invites tax firms, in-house teams, and tax professionals to make submissions for the 2027 World Tax rankings and the 2026 ITR Tax Awards globally
Pillar two was ‘weakened’ when it altered from a multinational convention agreement to simply national domestic law, Federico Bertocchi also argued
Imposing the tax on virtual assets is a measure that appears to have no legal, economic or statistical basis, one expert told ITR
The EU has seemingly capitulated to the US’s ‘side-by-side’ demands. This may be a win for the US, but the uncertainty has only just begun for pillar two
Gift this article