How VAT could help developing countries’ tax collection problems

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

How VAT could help developing countries’ tax collection problems

h-o-parl.jpg

Efforts to replace aid to poor countries with tax as a more stable source of revenue have almost entirely focussed on the corporate sector. But a UK International Development Committee meeting in Parliament saw an interesting debate emerge on the role of VAT.

Mick Moore, professorial fellow at the Institute of Development Studies, pointed to research that suggests aid is the most unstable source of public revenue for developing countries, while tax is the most stable. Few in the tax justice movement are in disagreement with this stance, however his ideas on how best to collect this revenue proved more controversial.

“Don’t be sidetracked by the allegedly regressive nature of VAT,” said Moore, arguing that because a large number of products are zero-rated, it is not clear that the tax is as regressive as some suggest.

Moore pointed out that almost all developing countries have adopted VAT because it is an efficient way of raising revenue.

“I would not remove such an effective mechanism,” said Moore.

Tim Besley, school professor of Economics and Political Science at the London School of Economics, argued that VAT has considerable benefits in administration.

Because companies deduct VAT, acting as tax collectors for the authorities, it means they formalise their accounts with the government.

“It has the benefit of building a broad-based tax,” said Besley.

Besley’s argument is compelling where there may be many smaller companies that have not registered as corporate taxpayers in developing countries and, as a long-term revenue raiser, it may be effective in bringing more companies into the tax system.

Speaking to International Tax Review after the meeting, however, Savior Mwambwa, executive director of the Centre for Trade Policy and Development, argued that poor countries need to look at the most effective short-term ways of raising revenue.

“Governments have to focus their energy on big multinational companies,” said Mwambwa. “This is easier to do because they’re already registered and licensed.”

Mwambwa argued that because the multinationals are already on the system, even if they are shifting their profits to tax havens, governments can chase them for the taxes they owe and use the money to build the capacity of tax administrations.

More than 70% of African countries have now adopted a VAT, and it increasingly seems to be the tax of choice for states across the continent looking to generate extra revenue, because it is a hard tax to avoid.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Awards
Submit your nominations to this year's WIBL EMEA Awards by 6 February 2026
Defending loss situations in TP is not about denying the existence of losses but about showing, through proactive measures, that the losses reflect genuine commercial realities
Further empowerment of HMRC enforcement has been praised, but the pre-Budget OBR leak was described as ‘shambolic’
Michel Braun of WTS Digital reviews ITR’s inaugural AI in tax event, and concludes that AI will enhance, not replace, the tax professional
The report is solid and balanced as it correctly underscores the ambitious institutional redesign that Brazil has undertaken in adopting a dual VAT model, experts tell ITR
The Brazilian law firm partner warns against going independent too early, considers the weight of political pressure, and tells ITR what makes tax cool
The lessons from Ireland are clear: selective, targeted, and credible fiscal incentives can unlock supply and investment
The ITR in-house award winner delves into his dramatic novelisation of tax transformation, and declares that 'tax doesn’t need AI right now'
Recent news of job cuts at EY is symptomatic of how the PwC controversy has tarnished the reputation of the entire ‘big four’
Experts reportedly discussed extending the safe harbour to 2027 to give countries more time to legislate; in other news, Baker McKenzie and Greenberg Traurig made senior tax hires
Gift this article