How VAT could help developing countries’ tax collection problems

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

How VAT could help developing countries’ tax collection problems

h-o-parl.jpg

Efforts to replace aid to poor countries with tax as a more stable source of revenue have almost entirely focussed on the corporate sector. But a UK International Development Committee meeting in Parliament saw an interesting debate emerge on the role of VAT.

Mick Moore, professorial fellow at the Institute of Development Studies, pointed to research that suggests aid is the most unstable source of public revenue for developing countries, while tax is the most stable. Few in the tax justice movement are in disagreement with this stance, however his ideas on how best to collect this revenue proved more controversial.

“Don’t be sidetracked by the allegedly regressive nature of VAT,” said Moore, arguing that because a large number of products are zero-rated, it is not clear that the tax is as regressive as some suggest.

Moore pointed out that almost all developing countries have adopted VAT because it is an efficient way of raising revenue.

“I would not remove such an effective mechanism,” said Moore.

Tim Besley, school professor of Economics and Political Science at the London School of Economics, argued that VAT has considerable benefits in administration.

Because companies deduct VAT, acting as tax collectors for the authorities, it means they formalise their accounts with the government.

“It has the benefit of building a broad-based tax,” said Besley.

Besley’s argument is compelling where there may be many smaller companies that have not registered as corporate taxpayers in developing countries and, as a long-term revenue raiser, it may be effective in bringing more companies into the tax system.

Speaking to International Tax Review after the meeting, however, Savior Mwambwa, executive director of the Centre for Trade Policy and Development, argued that poor countries need to look at the most effective short-term ways of raising revenue.

“Governments have to focus their energy on big multinational companies,” said Mwambwa. “This is easier to do because they’re already registered and licensed.”

Mwambwa argued that because the multinationals are already on the system, even if they are shifting their profits to tax havens, governments can chase them for the taxes they owe and use the money to build the capacity of tax administrations.

More than 70% of African countries have now adopted a VAT, and it increasingly seems to be the tax of choice for states across the continent looking to generate extra revenue, because it is a hard tax to avoid.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The levies extended beyond the president’s ‘legitimate reach’, the Supreme Court ruled
While Brazil’s consumption tax overhaul led to a short-term spike in tax advisory demand, we are now in a period of ‘normalisation’ marked by decreased recruitment
The expanded firm will comprise roughly 8,500 employees, including 550 partners; in other news, Paul Hastings and Macfarlanes made senior tax hires
Meanwhile, one expert highlights the importance of separating Venezuela’s tax authority from direct political control after ‘lost decades and isolation’
With PMK 108, Indonesia has upgraded its tax transparency regime for the digital era, focusing on data quality, governance, and cross border exchange rather than expanding regulatory reach
In a popular LinkedIn post, Jeremie Beitel encouraged firms to invest in junior talent even if it doesn’t lead to their loyalty, though recruiters offered ITR a mixed assessment
Advisers who do not register for the new regime in time could be prevented from interacting with HMRC, the tax authority said
Valid pillar two objectives are still intact after the side-by-side agreement, but whether the framework is now settled is ‘a $64,000 question’, Morrison Foerster’s tax chair told ITR
Ian Halligan previously led Baker Tilly’s international tax services in the US
Exclusive ITR data emphasises that DEI does not affect in-house buying decisions – and it’s nothing to do with the US president
Gift this article