India’s Chidambaram to reconsider Vodafone retroactive tax amendments

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

India’s Chidambaram to reconsider Vodafone retroactive tax amendments

chidambaram2.jpg

India’s new finance minister, Palaniappan Chidambaram, has moved to increase taxpayer confidence by ordering a review of the recently proposed retroactive tax law amendments.

Chidambaram told reporters at his first media briefing since taking over as finance minister on August 1 that his predecessor’s plans to target Vodafone-style transactions dating back to 1961 may not see the light of day. “It is true that the economy is challenged by a number of factors but it is also true that with sound policies, good governance and effective implementation, we would be able to overcome these challenges,” said Chidambaram.

chidambaram.jpg

The decision to introduce retroactive amendments followed the government’s January Supreme Court defeat in the much-discussed Vodafone case.

The case related to Vodafone’s 2007 purchase of a 67% stake in Hong Kong-based Hutchison’s Indian cellular unit.

Despite winning the case and avoiding a $2.5 billion tax bill, Vodafone will still be liable for tax if the amendment is passed. This prompted criticism of the government as many felt this disrespected the authority of the Supreme Court.

Chidambaram, who has twice before held the post of finance minister, said the amendment needed to be reviewed for fear of dissuading foreign investment.

“Since investment is an act of faith, we must remove any apprehension or distrust in the minds of investors,” said Chidambaram. “Clarity in tax laws, a stable tax regime, a non-adversarial tax administration, a fair mechanism for dispute resolution and an independent judiciary will provide great assurance to investors.”

This approach is quite the opposite of his predecessor, Pranab Mukherjee, who told parliament before he resigned that: “India cannot become a no-tax country... a tax haven. There cannot be a situation where somebody will make money on an asset located in India and will not pay tax either in India or the country of its origin.”

While Mukherjee denied that his comments were disrespectful or confrontational, his approach was criticised by many.

The proposed retrospective amendments will be discussed at International Tax Review's third annual India Tax Forum in Delhi on September 5 & 6.

Confirmed speakers include:

  • SK Mishra, Joint Secretary (Foreign Tax Division) and Competent Authority of India, Ministry of Finance;

  • Promila Bhardwaj, Director General of Income Tax (International Taxation & Transfer Pricing), Government of India;

  • Kamlesh Varshney, CIT (APA), Income Tax Department, Government of India

  • RN Dash, ex-Director General of Income Tax (International Taxation), Government of India;

  • Girish Srivastava, ex-Director General of Income Tax (International Taxation), Government of India;

  • Mohan Parasaran, Senior Advocate, Supreme Court of India and Additional Solicitor General of India;

  • Prashant Bhatnagar, head of India tax, Procter & Gamble;

  • R Mani, head of India tax, Tata;

  • Ketan Madia, vice president, taxes, GE; and

  • Bela Seth Mao, head of India tax, Shell.

India’s foremost tax specialists will tackle this issue and more. It is a unique opportunity to hear their views, increase your understanding of the upcoming changes and learn how best to prepare for the future.



more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

While the IBS incorporates taxable events previously covered by state and municipal taxes, its governance and operational logic represent a significant departure from the legacy model
The new office on the fourth floor of 4 More London will span 14,230 square feet, with the potential to expand to the first and second floors
MNEs now face a shift from modelling to execution as the side‑by‑side deal forces tax teams to upgrade systems, harmonise data, and prevent costly pillar two mismatches
As recent surveys suggest a disconnect between AI adoption and employee engagement, the big four risk digging themselves into a strategic hole
Almost three-quarters of surveyed tax professionals are concerned about inaccurate AI outputs; in other news, Dentons hired a partner from CMS to lead its Belgian tax team
Long-running, high-value and complex enquiries are a significant reason for HM Revenue and Customs’s increased TP yield, experts suggest
Landmark legal updates in India have led companies to prioritise specialised tax advisers over accountants, ITR has found
Brazil’s shift to a nationwide consumption tax is more than conceptual; it fundamentally transforms municipal revenue, enforcement, and administrative disputes
While some advisers praised the ruling’s definition of a ‘voucher’ for VAT purposes, a UK partner said the case left unanswered questions
While pillar two has been enacted on paper in Brazil, companies are encountering a range of practical compliance issues, ITR has heard
Gift this article