India’s Chidambaram to reconsider Vodafone retroactive tax amendments

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

India’s Chidambaram to reconsider Vodafone retroactive tax amendments

chidambaram2.jpg

India’s new finance minister, Palaniappan Chidambaram, has moved to increase taxpayer confidence by ordering a review of the recently proposed retroactive tax law amendments.

Chidambaram told reporters at his first media briefing since taking over as finance minister on August 1 that his predecessor’s plans to target Vodafone-style transactions dating back to 1961 may not see the light of day. “It is true that the economy is challenged by a number of factors but it is also true that with sound policies, good governance and effective implementation, we would be able to overcome these challenges,” said Chidambaram.

chidambaram.jpg

The decision to introduce retroactive amendments followed the government’s January Supreme Court defeat in the much-discussed Vodafone case.

The case related to Vodafone’s 2007 purchase of a 67% stake in Hong Kong-based Hutchison’s Indian cellular unit.

Despite winning the case and avoiding a $2.5 billion tax bill, Vodafone will still be liable for tax if the amendment is passed. This prompted criticism of the government as many felt this disrespected the authority of the Supreme Court.

Chidambaram, who has twice before held the post of finance minister, said the amendment needed to be reviewed for fear of dissuading foreign investment.

“Since investment is an act of faith, we must remove any apprehension or distrust in the minds of investors,” said Chidambaram. “Clarity in tax laws, a stable tax regime, a non-adversarial tax administration, a fair mechanism for dispute resolution and an independent judiciary will provide great assurance to investors.”

This approach is quite the opposite of his predecessor, Pranab Mukherjee, who told parliament before he resigned that: “India cannot become a no-tax country... a tax haven. There cannot be a situation where somebody will make money on an asset located in India and will not pay tax either in India or the country of its origin.”

While Mukherjee denied that his comments were disrespectful or confrontational, his approach was criticised by many.

The proposed retrospective amendments will be discussed at International Tax Review's third annual India Tax Forum in Delhi on September 5 & 6.

Confirmed speakers include:

  • SK Mishra, Joint Secretary (Foreign Tax Division) and Competent Authority of India, Ministry of Finance;

  • Promila Bhardwaj, Director General of Income Tax (International Taxation & Transfer Pricing), Government of India;

  • Kamlesh Varshney, CIT (APA), Income Tax Department, Government of India

  • RN Dash, ex-Director General of Income Tax (International Taxation), Government of India;

  • Girish Srivastava, ex-Director General of Income Tax (International Taxation), Government of India;

  • Mohan Parasaran, Senior Advocate, Supreme Court of India and Additional Solicitor General of India;

  • Prashant Bhatnagar, head of India tax, Procter & Gamble;

  • R Mani, head of India tax, Tata;

  • Ketan Madia, vice president, taxes, GE; and

  • Bela Seth Mao, head of India tax, Shell.

India’s foremost tax specialists will tackle this issue and more. It is a unique opportunity to hear their views, increase your understanding of the upcoming changes and learn how best to prepare for the future.



more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The Australian Taxation Office believes the Swedish furniture company has used TP to evade paying tax it owes
Supermarket chain Morrisons is facing a £17 million ($23 million) tax bill; in other news, Donald Trump has cut proposed tariffs
The controversial deal will allow US-parented groups to be carved out from key aspects of pillar two
Awards
ITR invites tax firms, in-house teams, and tax professionals to make submissions for the 2027 World Tax rankings and the 2026 ITR Tax Awards globally
Pillar two was ‘weakened’ when it altered from a multinational convention agreement to simply national domestic law, Federico Bertocchi also argued
Imposing the tax on virtual assets is a measure that appears to have no legal, economic or statistical basis, one expert told ITR
The EU has seemingly capitulated to the US’s ‘side-by-side’ demands. This may be a win for the US, but the uncertainty has only just begun for pillar two
The £7.4m buyout marks MHA’s latest acquisition since listing on the London Stock Exchange earlier this year
ITR’s most prolific stories of the year charted public pillar two spats, the continued fallout from the PwC Australia tax leaks scandal, and a headline tax fraud trial
The climbdowns pave the way for a side-by-side deal to be concluded this week, as per the US Treasury secretary’s expectation; in other news, Taft added a 10-partner tax team
Gift this article