Chile: New regulation for derivative instruments

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Chile: New regulation for derivative instruments

Foreign investors will be pleased to know that, as a consequence of recently published Law No. 20,544, the Chilean capital market has, for the first time, a formally regulated regime for derivative instruments, enforceable for instruments traded from January 1 2012.

As mentioned earlier this year, the new legislation puts to an end a lot of uncertainty regarding the tax treatment applicable for these types of instruments, which until now have only been regulated by administrative jurisprudence issued by the Chilean tax authorities.

Among other things, foreign investors need to consider the following, when trading Chilean derivatives.

Types of instruments

The new law expressly regulates forwards, futures, swaps, options, and a combination of any of these. However, the new legislation will also be applicable to other financial agreements whose values derive from the value of an underlying transaction, fulfilling the following joint requirements: its settlement value is determined over one or more variables; it does not require an initial investment or it is significantly lower than investing directly in the underlying assets; and the settlement of the instrument is performed at a future date.

Nevertheless, certain instruments are not covered by the new legislation, regardless of whether they fulfill with above requirements, such as insurance contracts, stock options, and short-sale agreements.

Source of income

As a general rule, income derived from assets located within the country or activities developed in Chile are considered to be Chilean source income. The new regulation for derivative instruments provides for a sourcing rule based on the taxpayer’s domicile, where only revenues obtained by Chilean residents or by a permanent establishment of foreign taxpayers in Chile are subject to taxes in Chile. Instruments settled by means of physical delivery of shares or quotas in Chilean companies are also subject to Chilean taxes, regardless of the taxpayer’s domicile.

As a consequence, the law puts an end to a long-term discussion not solved by administrative jurisprudence. Foreign investors obtaining revenues upon cash settlement of derivative instruments will not be subject to taxation in Chile.

Gain or loss recognition

In principle, taxpayers will have to recognise a gain or take a loss on cash basis, unless subject to the business profits tax. In such a case, recognition will be on accrual basis by reference to the instrument’s fair value.

Provided most business taxpayers are required to follow international financial reporting standards to reflect the instrument’s fair value, this market-to-market rule is intended to avoid an additional burden. However, those taxpayers not bound by this financial accounting method will need to find the information at an additional cost to assess the accrued gain or loss for the period.

The new legislation is considered to be an important advancement for the local capital market industry and new administrative regulation is expected in the near future.

Francisca Middleton (francisca.middleton@cl.pwc.com) & Benjamín Barros (benjamin.barros@cl.pwc.com)

PwC

Tel: +56 2 9400155

Fax +56 2 940 0503

Website: www.pwc.com/cl

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

As the firm embarks on a major shakeup of its EMEA partnerships, some staff will be watching nervously
The buyout of Hucke and Associates continues Ryan’s streak of firm acquisitions; in other news, a UK appeal against VAT on private school fees was dismissed
Tax teams are responding to usual client demand in the region, albeit with increased working from home flexibility, local sources indicate
A 120-plus-day delay to refunds would cost taxpayers almost $3bn in additional interest, the Cato Institute warned; plus indirect tax updates from February
The Office for Budget Responsibility’s pessimistic pillar two forecast accompanied the UK chancellor’s muted Spring Statement, dubbed ‘as dull as possible’ by one adviser
Digital tax reform is dissolving the old ‘temporal buffer’, forcing systems, institutions, and professionals to adapt as real-time reporting reshapes governance, capability, and compliance
Our first instalment features analysis of Deloitte’s landmark EMEA merger, Donald Trump’s Supreme Court tariff showdown and Venezuela’s tax evolution
While some believe it could have a positive effect on the wider advisory landscape, others argue that HMRC’s ‘red tape’ exercise won’t deter bad actors
The political optics of the US’s carve-out deal are poor, but as the Fair Tax Foundation’s Paul Monaghan writes, it preserves pillar two’s guiding ethos
The big four firm reportedly sent ‘threatening’ correspondence to Unity Advisory over its hiring of ex-PwC partners; plus tax recruitment news from the week
Gift this article