The Maltese foundation

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

The Maltese foundation

The Minister of Finance, the Economy and Investment recently enacted L.N.312 of 2010 – The Foundations (Income Tax) Regulations, 2010 (FITR) which regulate the taxation of foundations.

The FITR prescribe that for the purposes of the income tax acts, a foundation shall be treated in the same manner as a company that is ordinarily resident and domiciled in Malta. Therefore the rules applicable to the taxation of income of companies are applicable to foundations. Foundations pay tax at the rate of 35%, like companies. Distributable profits of foundations are allocated in the same manner applicable to companies. The profits allocated to beneficiaries of the foundation are treated as dividends distributed to the shareholders of a company.

Foundations are eligible to the flat-rate foreign tax credit and the participation exemption in the same manner as companies. Furthermore, distributions by foundations trigger the refundable tax credit system.

Foundations may be established with segregated cells. Each cell of the foundation is to be considered as a separate foundation. A beneficiary of a foundation may, transfer or otherwise deal with his interest in a foundation in any manner. Given that foundations are treated like companies, the transfer of the beneficial interest by the beneficiaries of the foundation is deemed to be a transfer of a security for the purposes of the income tax acts and consequently attracts tax on capital gains.

Article 32A of the Second Schedule of the Civil Code prescribes that foundations may not be established to trade or to carry out commercial activities, irrespective of the fact that any proceeds thereof would be used for social purposes. However:

  • A foundation may be endowed with commercial property or a shareholding in a profit making enterprise, a franchise, a trade mark or other asset which gives rise to income, as well as a ship as long as the organisation is only the passive owner of such assets;

  • A foundation may be used as a collective investment vehicle, and issue units to investors therein, for the passive holding of a common pool of assets, the management of which is delegated to a third party, including a pension or employee benefit arrangements; and

  • A foundation may be used as a vehicle for the purpose of a securitisation transaction, borrow monies against the issue of bonds and do all relative and ancillary acts.

Generally, foundations may not be established for a period exceeding 100 years; however, purpose foundations, foundations used as a collective investment vehicle and foundations used in a securitisation transaction may be established for an indefinite term.

The administrators of a foundation may be juridical persons provided that they have at least three directors.

Ernst & Young

Tel: +356 2347 1440

Website: www.ey.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

New research, which suggests LLMs can silently corrupt complex documents, should alert tax and legal teams relying on AI to handle iterative drafting and compliance workflows
Maintaining increased funding for HMRC is a ‘high possibility’ if he becomes PM, ITR has also heard
Awards
ITR is delighted to reveal all the shortlisted nominees for the 2026 Europe Tax Awards
The firm has hired a team of private client lawyers from Withers to launch in New York and Connecticut, though ITR analysis suggests it faces stiff competition
The ability of tax authorities to receive and analyse data is becoming ‘quite advanced’, warns Stuart Lang, head of EY’s compliance co-sourcing solution
The Court of Appeal ruling clarifies that treaty benefits are not abusive where transactions are commercially driven, providing greater certainty on “main purpose” anti-avoidance tests
Despite the Netherlands featuring an unusual concentration of World Tax-ranked technology-led providers, sources believe there’s a long way to go to challenge the established players
Ethics seems to be playing a subservient role to an entitlement culture borne out of a pervasive ‘revenue at all costs’ mentality at the big four
Historical World Tax data suggests the ‘largest law firm merger in history’ may not pose a serious threat to the world's leading tax practices
The repeal of Libya’s statute of limitations and tougher enforcement leave taxpayers navigating a high-stakes choice between conciliation and litigation
Gift this article