Ukraine: Recent tax changes in Ukraine

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Ukraine: Recent tax changes in Ukraine

kotenko.jpg

kalyta.jpg

Vladimir Kotenko


Iryna Kalyta

New Ukraine-Cyprus Double Tax Treaty starts applying

On January 1 2014, the Ukraine-Cyprus double tax treaty started to apply. The new treaty supersedes the exceptionally beneficial USSR-Cyprus treaty and provides for 5%/15% on dividends, 2% on interest and 5%/10% on royalties. Ukraine and Cyprus also managed to resolve the discrepancy between the Greek and the Ukrainian texts of the Ukraine-Cyprus treaty and ensured that the USSR-Cyprus treaty ceased to apply when the new treaty started applying, and not earlier.

Decrease of corporate profit tax and VAT rate is postponed

Ukraine postponed the declared decrease of corporate profit tax and VAT rates. In 2014, the VAT rate will remain the same as in 2013 (20%), whereas corporate profit tax rate will go down by one percentage point and be 18% (as opposed to the initially declared 16%).

Transfer of shares exempt from transfer tax

Starting in 2014, the transfer of shares in joint stock companies is no longer subject to the special purpose excise tax (which could reach up to 1.5% of the contract value). This legislative development significantly narrows the list of transactions covered by the tax. The exemption was introduced as part of a package of technical changes to the Tax Code of Ukraine, so it is not clear whether it truly was intended by the law maker.

Developments in new Ukrainian transfer pricing rules

The Ukrainian government adopted a list of low-tax jurisdictions that will apply for transfer pricing purposes. Transactions between Ukrainian companies and non-Ukrainian companies resident in low tax jurisdictions will be subject to Ukrainian transfer pricing rules even if these companies are unrelated. The list comprises of 74 states where the corporate profit tax rate is lower than that of Ukraine by 5%, and includes Cyprus, Ireland and Switzerland.

The Ukrainian government has also published a draft transfer pricing reporting template. The template is similar to that used in Russia, and implies disclosure of detailed information on controlled operations.

Vladimir Kotenko (vladimir.kotenko@ua.ey.com) and Iryna Kalyta (iryna.kalyta@ua.ey.com)

EY

Tel: +380 44 490 3000

Fax: +380 44 490 3030

Website: www.ey.com/ua

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

New research, which suggests LLMs can silently corrupt complex documents, should alert tax and legal teams relying on AI to handle iterative drafting and compliance workflows
Maintaining increased funding for HMRC is a ‘high possibility’ if he becomes PM, ITR has also heard
Awards
ITR is delighted to reveal all the shortlisted nominees for the 2026 Europe Tax Awards
The firm has hired a team of private client lawyers from Withers to launch in New York and Connecticut, though ITR analysis suggests it faces stiff competition
The ability of tax authorities to receive and analyse data is becoming ‘quite advanced’, warns Stuart Lang, head of EY’s compliance co-sourcing solution
The Court of Appeal ruling clarifies that treaty benefits are not abusive where transactions are commercially driven, providing greater certainty on “main purpose” anti-avoidance tests
Despite the Netherlands featuring an unusual concentration of World Tax-ranked technology-led providers, sources believe there’s a long way to go to challenge the established players
Ethics seems to be playing a subservient role to an entitlement culture borne out of a pervasive ‘revenue at all costs’ mentality at the big four
Historical World Tax data suggests the ‘largest law firm merger in history’ may not pose a serious threat to the world's leading tax practices
The repeal of Libya’s statute of limitations and tougher enforcement leave taxpayers navigating a high-stakes choice between conciliation and litigation
Gift this article