Serbia: Serbia – Armenia treaty ratified by Serbian parliament

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Serbia: Serbia – Armenia treaty ratified by Serbian parliament

rafailovic.jpg

Aleksandra Rafailovic

After Serbia's double taxation avoidance agreements with Georgia, Canada, Tunisia and Vietnam became effective on January 1 2014, the list of 54 treaty states will soon be extended by Armenia, the agreement with which was ratified in July. The treaty on the avoidance of double taxation between the Government of the Republic of Serbia and the Government of the Republic of Armenia was signed in Yerevan on March 10 2014, while the law on ratification, and the text of the treaty, were published in the Official Gazette of Republic of Serbia no. 7/14 of July 3 2014, and will enter into force in the near future, once ratified by the Republic of Armenia.

The treaty covers corporate income tax, personal income tax and tax on property in Serbia and profit tax, income tax and tax on property in Armenia, and stipulates that both countries will allow deduction from taxes in the amount of tax paid in the other state.

Income from immovable property, dividends, interest, copyrights, artists' or sportspersons' income and capital gains from the alienation of immovable and movable property generated by a resident of one contracting state may be taxed in the other state. In case of interest and royalties, the tax payable shall not be greater than 8% of the gross amount of interest and author fees.

Income for professional services (lawyers, doctors, accountants, engineers, scientists and so on) shall be taxable only in the resident's state, unless they have a permanent working base in the other state or stay there longer than 183 days in total during a 12 month period, and in that case tax will be calculated only for that part of the income.

Company profits generated in one contracting state shall be taxable only in that state unless the company is present in the other contracting state through a permanent establishment.

Students, professors and researchers shall be exempt from taxation of income for remuneration they receive for support during studies or for education, or remuneration for such teaching or research, if such payments arise from sources outside that state.

Income recipients prove their residential status with a special form verified by the competent foreign authority, and translated into Serbian language by a court interpreter.

Aleksandra Rafailovic (aleksandra.rafailovic@eurofast.eu)

Eurofast Global Belgrade

Tel: +381 11 3241484

Website: www.eurofast.eu

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

HMRC expects advisers to meet ever-higher compliance criteria. After 24 consecutive qualified audit opinions, many will ask whether HMRC should hold itself to the same standards
The purchase of Marosa represents the second major tax tech consolidation this week, raising questions of a broader industry trend
Peru’s approach to TP is increasingly at odds with OECD-style profitability policies, exposing multinational groups to asymmetric tax adjustments
Hany Elnaggar examines how the region's legacy economic substance regimes and the OECD's pillar two framework are converging on the same underlying test
The deals for TP Accurate and Intra Pricing Solutions will enhance Alphatax’s ability to support clients with the full TP lifecycle, the tax tech provider claimed
The DS Advocates partner discusses career reinvention, tax disputes and why advisory and litigation experience should complement one another
Lindsay Clayton’s arrival at Baker McKenzie continues the firm’s storied pursuit of ex-US government lawyers, a strategy reinforced by robust World Tax rankings
Shared transaction semantics, governed data and reusable ERP design may prove the most significant benefits of the UK's move to Peppol
As pillar two reshapes global tax competition, the UK faces a crucial challenge: how to remain attractive to multinationals without sacrificing tax revenues
Pillar two may be raising less than expected, but professor René Matteotti says the regime is still changing multinational tax behaviour
Gift this article