Serbia: Serbia – Armenia treaty ratified by Serbian parliament

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Serbia: Serbia – Armenia treaty ratified by Serbian parliament

rafailovic.jpg

Aleksandra Rafailovic

After Serbia's double taxation avoidance agreements with Georgia, Canada, Tunisia and Vietnam became effective on January 1 2014, the list of 54 treaty states will soon be extended by Armenia, the agreement with which was ratified in July. The treaty on the avoidance of double taxation between the Government of the Republic of Serbia and the Government of the Republic of Armenia was signed in Yerevan on March 10 2014, while the law on ratification, and the text of the treaty, were published in the Official Gazette of Republic of Serbia no. 7/14 of July 3 2014, and will enter into force in the near future, once ratified by the Republic of Armenia.

The treaty covers corporate income tax, personal income tax and tax on property in Serbia and profit tax, income tax and tax on property in Armenia, and stipulates that both countries will allow deduction from taxes in the amount of tax paid in the other state.

Income from immovable property, dividends, interest, copyrights, artists' or sportspersons' income and capital gains from the alienation of immovable and movable property generated by a resident of one contracting state may be taxed in the other state. In case of interest and royalties, the tax payable shall not be greater than 8% of the gross amount of interest and author fees.

Income for professional services (lawyers, doctors, accountants, engineers, scientists and so on) shall be taxable only in the resident's state, unless they have a permanent working base in the other state or stay there longer than 183 days in total during a 12 month period, and in that case tax will be calculated only for that part of the income.

Company profits generated in one contracting state shall be taxable only in that state unless the company is present in the other contracting state through a permanent establishment.

Students, professors and researchers shall be exempt from taxation of income for remuneration they receive for support during studies or for education, or remuneration for such teaching or research, if such payments arise from sources outside that state.

Income recipients prove their residential status with a special form verified by the competent foreign authority, and translated into Serbian language by a court interpreter.

Aleksandra Rafailovic (aleksandra.rafailovic@eurofast.eu)

Eurofast Global Belgrade

Tel: +381 11 3241484

Website: www.eurofast.eu

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Long-running, high-value and complex enquiries are a significant reason for HM Revenue and Customs’s increased TP yield, experts suggest
Landmark legal updates in India have led companies to prioritise specialised tax advisers over accountants, ITR has found
Brazil’s shift to a nationwide consumption tax is more than conceptual; it fundamentally transforms municipal revenue, enforcement, and administrative disputes
While some advisers praised the ruling’s definition of a ‘voucher’ for VAT purposes, a UK partner said the case left unanswered questions
While pillar two has been enacted on paper in Brazil, companies are encountering a range of practical compliance issues, ITR has heard
Moore, founding partner of the Chicago tax boutique which bears her name, shares her career wisdom for ITR’s new Women in Tax interview series
But partners at the firm admit that jumping ship to the US would not be as easy as some believe
Governments are rewriting tax policy for the AI era, deploying digital taxes, tailored incentives and algorithmic enforcement that redefine where value is created
Wingrove will succeed Bill Thomas, who has served in the role since 2017; in other news, Andersen unveiled a sharp increase in revenues for 2025
Partners are divided on Italy vs PDM D’s analytical depth, evidentiary standards, and what the judgment signals for future intra-group financing cases
Gift this article