China: Standardisation of the administration on cost sharing agreements

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

China: Standardisation of the administration on cost sharing agreements

ho.jpg

lu.jpg

Khoonming Ho


Lewis Lu

The State Administration of Taxation (SAT) promulgated the Announcement on Standardising the Administration of Cost Sharing Agreements (Announcement 45) on June 16 2015. The Announcement aims to streamline the administration process, as well as strengthen the follow-up administration, so as to improve and standardise the administration of cost sharing agreements. Announcement 45 has been issued to replace Article 69 of the Implementation Measures for Special Tax Adjustments (Provisional) ('Circular 2'), which originally addressed the administration of cost sharing agreement. The main updates are:

  • Repeal of the 'Reporting to the SAT' requirement of Circular 2, with a new requirement for enterprises to "submit the agreements to the in-charge tax authorities" instead;

  • Requirement for taxpayers signing cost sharing arrangements to file Related Party Transaction Disclosure Forms along with the corporate income tax annual tax returns, regardless of whether the cost sharing agreement is in effect or not; and

  • Repeal of the former process of examination, which has been replaced by strengthened follow-up administration.

The repeal of the 'reporting' and 'examination' process in Announcement 45 is, to a large extent, in line with the mainstream trend of streamlining the national administration procedures. However, this change will shift the focus of the tax authorities more towards follow-up administration and investigation. In practice, to obtain certainty in implementing cost sharing agreements, taxpayers still need to communicate in advance, and reach consensus, with the tax authorities. Applying for an advance pricing agreement (APA) is one practical way to achieve this goal. However, currently the application of a unilateral APA should be reviewed by the in-charge tax authorities and submitted to SAT for final review and approval.

Announcement 45 emphasises the application of the arm's-length principle and the 'principle of costs and benefits being commensurate'. However, the Announcement does not make explicit rules and standards on how to assess whether these two principles are satisfied or not. Specifically, Announcement 45 did not give answers to a series of implementation issues, such as how to determine the arm's-length price, the implications of business tax (BT) and value added tax (VAT) under the cost sharing agreement, the treatment of balancing payments (such as true-ups) of cross-border transactions, among others.

Khoonming Ho (khoonming.ho@kpmg.com)

KPMG, China and Hong Kong SAR

Tel: +86 (10) 8508 7082

Lewis Lu (lewis.lu@kpmg.com)

KPMG, Central China

Tel: +86 (21) 2212 3421

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

While it’s great that the OECD is alive to multinationals’ fears of being caught in a compliance trap, the ‘common understanding’ illustrates a worrying lack of readiness
Rising demand for specialist expertise has fuelled the growth in tax partner headcounts, Cain Dwyer found; in other news, Switzerland has been urged to reconsider pillar two
An OECD report on the taxation of the digital economy is expected by the end of 2026, according to the group of nations
Trophy assets are evolving from personal indulgences to structured investments, prompting family offices to prioritise tax efficiency, governance discipline, and cross-border compliance
As demand for complex, cross-border private client counsel spikes, Patrick McCormick sees opportunity in starting from scratch
As part of an exclusive global alliance, KPMG will become one of Anthropic’s ‘preferred consultants’ for private equity
In the second part of this series, the focus shifts to how taxpayers can manage ongoing risks across the lifecycle of cross-border structures
Jurisdictions have moved to ensure that multinationals are not punished for late GIR filings due to a lack of available filing portals or exchange relationships
HMRC’s push for unified tax adviser registration won’t prevent every instance of improper conduct, but it is good for taxpayers and the UK’s reputation
Elsewhere, the UAE’s tax office has issued an update on registration penalties and two firms have been busy making lateral hires
Gift this article