Switzerland: What does ‘arm’s-length’ mean?

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Switzerland: What does ‘arm’s-length’ mean?

rudolf.jpg

hurdowar.jpg

Hans Rudolf Habermacher


Yan Hurdowar

Swiss companies engaged in cost sharing agreements with the US should take note of the US Tax Court ruling in the Altera case. In its recent decision in Altera Corporation vs the Commissioner of Internal Revenue the US Tax Court has reaffirmed its previous decision in Xilinx (2010) that cost sharing agreements (CSA) need not share stock-based compensation. In the specific case Altera US (located in the US and responsible for the markets in North America) and Altera International (located in the Cayman Islands and responsible for all other markets) jointly own and develop programming tools under a R&D cost sharing agreement.

As part of its decision process the court upheld that the arm's-length standard as defined in the US Model Tax Convention would prevail over the US tax code for international transactions and that the arm's-length standard would be met if the transaction reflects what independent third parties would agree with each other. Already in the Xilinx case it had been demonstrated that third parties would indeed not include share-based compensation as part of the cost base of a CSA.

On this basis the US Tax Court concluded that stock-based compensation may not have to be shared between different parties to a CSA, reaffirming its decision in Xilinx.

A joint R&D development structure for intellectual property under a CSA arrangement, as illustrated in the Altera case, may exist between many US-based MNCs and their Swiss operations which act either as regional headquarter for the EMEA region or for the whole world, except North America.

Particularly in innovative industries, such as the software and biotech industry, stock-based compensation often represents a large part of the compensation packages for R&D management. On the grounds that such compensation is often considered excessive and due to the fact that it is not a cash-out expense for the entity in the US, many foreign tax administrations have challenged the full deductibility of cost share attributions in the past.

Whilst the Swiss tax administration mostly accepted the contributions by the Swiss parties to a CSA in the past, we recommend that companies concerned review the situation with their US counterparties and make the appropriate changes in due course.

Hans Rudolf Habermacher (hhabermacher@deloitte.ch) and Yan Hurdowar (yhurdowar@deloitte.ch)

Deloitte

Tel: +41 58 279 6327 and +41 58 279 8152

Website: www.deloitte.ch

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

From Dhruva Advisors to Svalner Atlas, Ryan is growing fast. Tom Shave discusses consolidation, competition, and tax’s private equity debate
Awards
ITR is delighted to reveal the shortlisted nominees for the Middle East Tax Awards
The UK has confirmed its approach to the OECD’s side-by-side deal, but US-parented groups may find pillar two compliance remains far from straightforward
Fragmented pillar two taxation and increased use of AI by tax authorities have left clients fearful of heightened disputes exposure
Grant Thornton Advisors’ latest acquisition has produced the fifth-largest US advisory firm by revenue, but there’s still a clear gulf between it and the big four
Crowe joins Grant Thornton, WTS and Ryan in attracting PE investment, suggesting that dealmakers remain bullish on the tax advisory sector
HMRC expects advisers to meet ever-higher compliance criteria. After 24 consecutive qualified audit opinions, many will ask whether HMRC should hold itself to the same standards
The purchase of Marosa represents the second major tax tech consolidation this week, raising questions of a broader industry trend
Peru’s approach to TP is increasingly at odds with OECD-style profitability policies, exposing multinational groups to asymmetric tax adjustments
Hany Elnaggar examines how the region's legacy economic substance regimes and the OECD's pillar two framework are converging on the same underlying test
Gift this article