Germany: Interest-free loans between foreign subsidiaries

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Germany: Interest-free loans between foreign subsidiaries

schnitger.jpg

tranacher.jpg

Arne Schnitger


Philipp Tranacher

Interest-free loans can be found in group finance structures worldwide. In Germany, such loans are in principle not subject to transfer pricing adjustments as long as they are not granted cross-border. German tax law has few regulations on how the benefits from such interest-free loans are to be treated for German tax purposes. The Grand Senate of the Supreme Tax Court held on October 26 1987 (GrS 2/86) that the benefit from an interest-free loan between two foreign subsidiaries was a hidden distribution by the lender to the (German) parent company. The cost, though, was not an additional investment in the borrower but rather a tax deductible expense of the parent. This court decision was based on the former corporation tax imputation system.

The Supreme Tax Court confirmed in its decision of February 4 2014 (I R 32/12) that these principles still apply under the tax regime of the income exemption taxation method in force since 2001. The court's decision relates to the tax treatment of interest-free loans between German subsidiaries of the same German parent. Accordingly, the parent continues to be entitled to a deduction in the amount of the interest waived, while the benefit is a (largely tax-free) hidden distribution from the lender.

Although the facts and circumstances of the court case were domestic, the same principles should apply to investments abroad. Naturally, the foreign tax implications will also call for consideration.

Arne Schnitger (arne.schnitger@de.pwc.com) and Philipp Tranacher (philipp.tranacher@de.pwc.com)

PwC

Tel: +49 30 2636 5466 and +49 30 2636 4052

Website: www.pwc.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Valid pillar two objectives are still intact after the side-by-side agreement, but whether the framework is now settled is ‘a $64,000 question’, Morrison Foerster’s tax chair told ITR
Ian Halligan previously led Baker Tilly’s international tax services in the US
Exclusive ITR data emphasises that DEI does not affect in-house buying decisions – and it’s nothing to do with the US president
The firms made senior hires in Los Angeles and Cleveland respectively; in other news, South Korea reported an 11% rise in tax income, fuelled by a corporation tax boom
The ‘deeply flawed’ report is attempting to derail UN tax convention debates, the Tax Justice Network’s CEO said
Salim Rahim, a TP specialist, had been a partner at Baker McKenzie since 2010
While the manual should be consulted for any questions around MAPs, the OECD’s Sriram Govind also emphasised that the guidance is ‘not a political commitment’
The landmark Indian Supreme Court judgment redefines GAAR, JAAR and treaty safeguards, rejects protections for indirect transfers and tightens conditions for Mauritius‑based investors claiming DTAA relief
The expansion introduces ‘business-level digital capabilities’ for tax professionals, the US tax agency said
As tax teams face pressure from complex rules and manual processes, adopting clear ownership, clean data and adaptable technology is essential, writes Russell Gammon, chief innovation officer at Tax Systems
Gift this article