Switzerland: Swiss CTR III - Latest draft legislation issued by the Federal Council

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Switzerland: Swiss CTR III - Latest draft legislation issued by the Federal Council

zulauf.jpg

weder.jpg

Rene Zulauf


Diego Weder

Overall the draft legislation (released after public consultation) for Switzerland's Corporate Tax Reform III (CTR III) remains very attractive, in particular given the following favourable developments as compared to the original proposal:

  • The proposed introduction of a capital gains tax for individuals was dropped;

  • The draft legislation will newly introduce some sort of R&D incentives, which were not in the original proposal, in addition to the patent box regime;

  • The so-called step up for tax purposes that would essentially lead to a grandfathering of the effective tax rates of existing cantonal tax regimes that sunset as part of the tax reform presumably in 2019 or 2020, for many years should now be structured in such a way as also to provide a financial statement benefit, that is, for US GAAP and IFRS purposes, not just for cash tax purposes; and

  • The planned abolition of the 1% capital issuance tax on equity contributions was confirmed.

The proposed peripheral measures that were dropped, such as the change of the participation regime, were not necessarily favourable to the taxpayer and did not find enough support.

The one negative development is that the notional interest deduction (NID) on equity was dropped. Without this NID regime Switzerland would no longer be attractive for financing activities. Accordingly, a lobbying effort can be expected to bring this regime back into the legislation.

The main replacement measures for the tax regimes that sunset in 2019 or 2020, depending on the time needed for the legislative process, are:

  • Step-up for tax purposes;

  • Patent box; and

  • General tax rate reduction.

Although a public vote on the legislation by the Swiss voters is likely, we are confident that the legislation would pass such a referendum.

Rene Zulauf (rzulauf@deloitte.ch) and Diego Weder (diweder@deloitte.com)

Deloitte

Tel: +41 58 279 6359 and +1 917 573 6783

Website: www.deloitte.ch

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Pillar two compliance is creating unprecedented data demands for multinational tax departments, making closer collaboration with FP&A teams essential for accurate reporting and audit readiness
Among the arrivals is Andrew Howell, who leaves scandal-hit PwC Australia after representing PepsiCo in a high-profile TP dispute
ITR's podcast examines whether the big four have overarching cultural issues and assesses the competitive threat of technology-backed transfer pricing firms
The UK advisory firm has seen its global revenues expand by £27.2m following its listing and acquisition of Baker Tilly South-East Europe
Tax-trained John Sams, previously the firm’s CFO and COO, was appointed after a rigorous process, KPMG said
From Mauritius substance rules to Kenyan SEP tax and South African anti-avoidance measures, businesses must navigate growing scrutiny of cross-border IP structures in Africa
ITR spoke to multinationals, advisers and software providers about a June 30 deadline defined by faulty portals, high compliance costs and hard lessons
After years of onerous pillar two prep, businesses will be galled in seeing tax revenues outweighed by compliance costs
Tax advisers should revisit India secondment arrangements after the EY US ruling strengthened the Centrica precedent and raised fresh withholding concerns
Despite the shortfall, effective tax rates of multinationals have seen a ‘statistically significant rise’
Gift this article