Australia: Corporate collective investment vehicles tax regime

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Australia: Corporate collective investment vehicles tax regime

intl-updates

The Australian government released exposure draft legislation on the tax treatment of corporate collective investment vehicles (CCIVs) on Wednesday, December 20 2017. The draft legislation is open to public consultation until February 2 2018 and will apply to income years commencing on or after July 1 2018.

A CCIV is a company that is registered under the Australian Corporations Act and will provide a new type of CIV which is internationally recognised and readily marketed to foreign investors, including through the Asia Region Funds Passport. A complying CCIV (or attribution corporate collective investment vehicle (ACCIV)) will have access to an attribution or 'character flow through' model of taxation, generally aligned with the attribution managed investment trust (AMIT) tax regime. Principally, this will include flow-through tax treatment, deemed capital account treatment (under an election), and certain eligible non-resident investors will be taxed at concessional rates (generally 15%) on attributed income, subject to Australia's withholding tax provisions.

These concessions are directed at, principally, passive type investments by a sufficiently widely held corporation.

A new concept of an attribution investment vehicle (AIV) has been introduced which includes both ACCIVs and AMITs.

The CCIV tax regime was released together with the exposure draft legislation for the Asia region funds passport and will be subject to close consultation and likely finalised and passed through the Australian Parliament in the coming months.

Cross-border related party financing arrangements

The Australian Taxation Office (ATO) released its final Practical Compliance Guideline, PCG 2017/4, on its compliance approach to cross-border related party financing arrangements and related transactions on December 18 2017. Essentially, the ATO has introduced a risk categorisation or framework for related party financing arrangements and strongly encouraged multinationals to self-assess their tax risk position.

As a part of this encouragement, the ATO is offering to remit penalties and interest for voluntary disclosures for both historical and prospective financing arrangements, where certain pre-conditions are met.

The ATO has outlined various tax risk indicators which relate to, among other things, third-party debt of the borrowing group, security/collateral arrangements, subordinated debt, exotic features and the currency of the debt.

All Australian and foreign-based multinationals with material cross-border financing arrangements should promptly review their existing and proposed related party financing contracts in the context of PCG 2017/4.

Diverted profits tax (DPT) update

The ATO on December 18 2017 released Law Administration Practice Statement PSLA 2017/2 on the proposed administrative process for making DPT assessments. Further, it released draft Law Companion Guideline LCG 2017/D7 on practical guidance for taxpayers on key aspects of the DPT, including the principal purpose test, sufficient foreign tax test, and the sufficient economic substance test.

McCormack

Jock McCormack

Jock McCormack (jock.mccormack@dlapiper.com)

DLA Piper Australia

Tel: +61 2 9286 8253

Fax: +61 2 9286 8007

Website: www.dlapiper.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Despite the decline in profitability, the firm’s tax advisory business delivered a 3.4% revenue growth
Firms are making use of inventories and ample profit margins to avoid or absorb the initial impact of higher tariffs, an OECD report found
While UN proposals to shift airline taxation from a residence-based system to a source-state one are not set in stone, ex-British Airways CEO Willie Walsh warns they would increase costs and complexity
Von Wobeser y Sierra’s head of tax shares best practices for resolving tax controversy and touts his firm’s founding partner as an exemplar of legal practice
ITR concludes its analysis of World Tax’s rankings for 2026 by highlighting the firms that stood out most on a global scale
Experts from law firm Kennedys outline the key tax disputes trends set to define 2026, ranging from increased enforcement to continued tariff drama and AI usage
They also warned against an ‘unnecessary duplication of efforts’ in UN tax convention negotiations; in other news, White & Case has hired Freshfields’ former French tax head
Awards
Submit your nominations to this year's WIBL EMEA Awards by 16 February 2026
Defending loss situations in TP is not about denying the existence of losses but about showing, through proactive measures, that the losses reflect genuine commercial realities
Further empowerment of HMRC enforcement has been praised, but the pre-Budget OBR leak was described as ‘shambolic’
Gift this article