Hong Kong’s OFC regime to commence on July 30 2018

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Hong Kong’s OFC regime to commence on July 30 2018

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-kpmg.png
intl-updates

In recent years, the Hong Kong government has introduced various incentives to bolster Hong Kong as an international finance centre by extending the offshore funds exemption and special purpose vehicle (SPV) exemption.

On March 29 2018, the Hong Kong government published the Inland Revenue (Amendment) (No 2) Ordinance 2018 (Ordinance) in the Gazette to extend the profits tax exemption to privately offered Hong Kong open-ended fund companies (OFCs).

The introduction of the OFC regime is a key initiative to help diversify Hong Kong's fund domiciliation platform and will be effective on July 30 2018. The key qualifying conditions for a privately offered OFC to enjoy the profits tax exemption include:

  • The OFC must be a Hong Kong resident where the central management and control must be exercised in Hong Kong;

  • The OFC must be non-closely held;

  • The OFC must carry out transactions in asset classes permissible for privately offered OFCs as specified in the OFC code;

  • The OFC's relevant transactions must be carried out through or arranged by a qualified person in Hong Kong; and

  • The OFC's trading receipts from incidental transactions to the relevant transactions are subject to a 5% threshold.

There are also complex conditions in meeting the 'non-closely held' definition which includes the number of investors, the minimum investment and the participation interest of each investor. While this is a welcome incentive, its application may be limited due to several key restrictions. The key tax issues associated with the OFC regime include:

  • The ordinance is silent on the stamp duty implications associated with an OFC. Under prevailing Hong Kong stamp duty law, the allotment and cancellation of Hong Kong stocks (e.g., shares of an OFC) are not subject to stamp duty. However, the transfer of stocks of an OFC would be subject to stamp duty;

  • The OFC must continue to pass the non-closely held test for 24 months after the first 24-month grace period beginning from foundation of the company. If not, the OFC will be taxable retrospectively from its start-up date;

  • The OFC can seek exemption from the Commission of Inland Revenue from meeting the non-closely held condition. However, there is no objective test for the Hong Kong tax authority to exercise its discretion;

  • For carried interest distributions, there is a provision that deems dividends from a non-exempt OFC to be taxable to the extent they are in relation to services rendered in Hong Kong. It does not take into account any circumstances giving rise to a carry distribution in connection with an investment in the OFC; and

  • The exemption does not apply to transactions in certain tainted assets, including gains on shares in companies where the underlying value includes Hong Kong real estate or significant 'short-term assets'.

The Hong Kong government recognises that the asset management industry is a fast-growing sector within the financial services industry. While this is another potentially welcome tax incentive that could promote Hong Kong as a potential fund domiciliation platform, the potentially onerous conditions that need to be satisfied in order to qualify for the tax exemption may limit its real world application.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

While the IBS incorporates taxable events previously covered by state and municipal taxes, its governance and operational logic represent a significant departure from the legacy model
The new office on the fourth floor of 4 More London will span 14,230 square feet, with the potential to expand to the first and second floors
MNEs now face a shift from modelling to execution as the side‑by‑side deal forces tax teams to upgrade systems, harmonise data, and prevent costly pillar two mismatches
As recent surveys suggest a disconnect between AI adoption and employee engagement, the big four risk digging themselves into a strategic hole
Almost three-quarters of surveyed tax professionals are concerned about inaccurate AI outputs; in other news, Dentons hired a partner from CMS to lead its Belgian tax team
Long-running, high-value and complex enquiries are a significant reason for HM Revenue and Customs’s increased TP yield, experts suggest
Landmark legal updates in India have led companies to prioritise specialised tax advisers over accountants, ITR has found
Brazil’s shift to a nationwide consumption tax is more than conceptual; it fundamentally transforms municipal revenue, enforcement, and administrative disputes
While some advisers praised the ruling’s definition of a ‘voucher’ for VAT purposes, a UK partner said the case left unanswered questions
While pillar two has been enacted on paper in Brazil, companies are encountering a range of practical compliance issues, ITR has heard
Gift this article