Hong Kong’s OFC regime to commence on July 30 2018

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Hong Kong’s OFC regime to commence on July 30 2018

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-kpmg.png
intl-updates

In recent years, the Hong Kong government has introduced various incentives to bolster Hong Kong as an international finance centre by extending the offshore funds exemption and special purpose vehicle (SPV) exemption.

On March 29 2018, the Hong Kong government published the Inland Revenue (Amendment) (No 2) Ordinance 2018 (Ordinance) in the Gazette to extend the profits tax exemption to privately offered Hong Kong open-ended fund companies (OFCs).

The introduction of the OFC regime is a key initiative to help diversify Hong Kong's fund domiciliation platform and will be effective on July 30 2018. The key qualifying conditions for a privately offered OFC to enjoy the profits tax exemption include:

  • The OFC must be a Hong Kong resident where the central management and control must be exercised in Hong Kong;

  • The OFC must be non-closely held;

  • The OFC must carry out transactions in asset classes permissible for privately offered OFCs as specified in the OFC code;

  • The OFC's relevant transactions must be carried out through or arranged by a qualified person in Hong Kong; and

  • The OFC's trading receipts from incidental transactions to the relevant transactions are subject to a 5% threshold.

There are also complex conditions in meeting the 'non-closely held' definition which includes the number of investors, the minimum investment and the participation interest of each investor. While this is a welcome incentive, its application may be limited due to several key restrictions. The key tax issues associated with the OFC regime include:

  • The ordinance is silent on the stamp duty implications associated with an OFC. Under prevailing Hong Kong stamp duty law, the allotment and cancellation of Hong Kong stocks (e.g., shares of an OFC) are not subject to stamp duty. However, the transfer of stocks of an OFC would be subject to stamp duty;

  • The OFC must continue to pass the non-closely held test for 24 months after the first 24-month grace period beginning from foundation of the company. If not, the OFC will be taxable retrospectively from its start-up date;

  • The OFC can seek exemption from the Commission of Inland Revenue from meeting the non-closely held condition. However, there is no objective test for the Hong Kong tax authority to exercise its discretion;

  • For carried interest distributions, there is a provision that deems dividends from a non-exempt OFC to be taxable to the extent they are in relation to services rendered in Hong Kong. It does not take into account any circumstances giving rise to a carry distribution in connection with an investment in the OFC; and

  • The exemption does not apply to transactions in certain tainted assets, including gains on shares in companies where the underlying value includes Hong Kong real estate or significant 'short-term assets'.

The Hong Kong government recognises that the asset management industry is a fast-growing sector within the financial services industry. While this is another potentially welcome tax incentive that could promote Hong Kong as a potential fund domiciliation platform, the potentially onerous conditions that need to be satisfied in order to qualify for the tax exemption may limit its real world application.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Exclusive ITR data emphasises that DEI does not affect in-house buying decisions – and it’s nothing to do with the US president
The firms made senior hires in Los Angeles and Cleveland respectively; in other news, South Korea reported an 11% rise in tax income, fuelled by a corporation tax boom
The ‘deeply flawed’ report is attempting to derail UN tax convention debates, the Tax Justice Network’s CEO said
Salim Rahim, a TP specialist, had been a partner at Baker McKenzie since 2010
While the manual should be consulted for any questions around MAPs, the OECD’s Sriram Govind also emphasised that the guidance is ‘not a political commitment’
The landmark Indian Supreme Court judgment redefines GAAR, JAAR and treaty safeguards, rejects protections for indirect transfers and tightens conditions for Mauritius‑based investors claiming DTAA relief
The expansion introduces ‘business-level digital capabilities’ for tax professionals, the US tax agency said
As tax teams face pressure from complex rules and manual processes, adopting clear ownership, clean data and adaptable technology is essential, writes Russell Gammon, chief innovation officer at Tax Systems
Partners want to join Ryan because it’s a disruptor firm, truly global and less bureaucratic, Tom Shave told ITR
If Trump continues to poke the world’s ‘middle powers’ with a stick, he shouldn’t be surprised when they retaliate
Gift this article