Brazil addresses the establishment of joint and several tax liability

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Brazil addresses the establishment of joint and several tax liability

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-mattosfilho.png
Brazil Court - Large

Brazil's tax authorities may now establish liability of third parties before court judgement. Mattos Filho's Ana Paula S. Lui Barreto and Leonardo Fernandes Rebello discuss the impact to third parties and their defence.

Brazil’s Federal Revenue Office published normative instruction No. 1862 on December 28 2018, addressing the procedure for the establishment of joint and several tax responsibility, the situation where a taxpayer and third party may be jointly and severally liable for a tax obligation.

Among the novelties addressed, those related to the moment and procedure deserve more attention. According to the normative text, the tax authorities may now establish liability of third parties before judgment by the first instance and once the administrative proceeding is concluded, as well as in cases discussing tax compensation claims.

In this scenario, according to the text of the normative instruction, when the establishment of liability occurs during the tax administrative proceeding (before the first instance decision), and in cases of tax offsetting, the third parties may present their defenses according to the procedure established in Decree No. 70.235/72. In these cases, it is also possible to appeal to the Administrative Council of Tax Appeals (CARF).

In cases where such an establishment takes place after the conclusion of the tax administrative proceeding, the third party shall file a request for reconsideration to the same tax auditor who made the establishment. In case it is not upheld, the request may also be considered by the officer of the Internal Revenue Service unit and by the Regional Superintendent.

It is important to observe that these new procedures brought by the normative instruction challenge Article 142 of the Brazilian National Tax Code, which is express in assigning the tax authority to identify the taxpayer and the parties jointly and severally liable for the tax obligation through tax assessment notice (i.e not along or upon conclusion of the tax administrative procedure).

In cases where the establishment of liability is made after the conclusion of the tax administrative proceeding, and there is a clear violation of the right to contest, they will have to defend themselves through an internal procedure of the Brazilian Internal Revenue Service, and are not granted access to the procedure of Decree No. 70.235/72 (and to the judgment by the CARF, which is a technical and joint body council).  

Notwithstanding the considerations, normative instruction No. 1862/2018 also set forth provisions aimed at assigning more transparency to the taxpayers and to the administrative and judging authorities regarding the procedure for the establishment of joint and several tax liability.

As noted in Article 1, the Brazilian Internal Revenue Service explains that the tax liability established to a third party, who is not a taxpayer nor a tax substitute, presupposes the existence of a specific rule, and is different from the one that gives rise to the tax.

Furthermore, the normative opinion clarifies the requirements that must be included in the tax assessment notice in order to establish tax liability. These are qualification of the third party, description of the facts that give rise to the establishment of liability, and the legal classification and the delimitation of the tax credit to be ascribed to the responsible party.

In conclusion, the new rules regarding the establishment of joint and several tax liability after the issuance of the tax assessment notice, especially after the conclusion of the tax administrative proceeding, deserve attention since they challenge Article 142 of the Brazilian National Tax Code, and the right to contestation and a full defense of the responsible third parties.

On the other hand, it has also brought new rules that should assign more certainty regarding the procedure of establishing tax liability.

Barreto, Ana Paula S Lui

Ana Paula S. Lui Barreto

 

Fernandes Rebello, Leonardo

Leonardo Fernandes Rebello

This article was written by Ana Paula S. Lui Barreto and Leonardo Fernandes Rebello of Mattos Filho.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Despite the Netherlands featuring an unusual concentration of World Tax-ranked technology-led providers, sources believe there’s a long way to go to challenge the established players
Ethics seems to be playing a subservient role to an entitlement culture borne out of a pervasive ‘revenue at all costs’ mentality at the big four
Historical World Tax data suggests the ‘largest law firm merger in history’ may not pose a serious threat to the world's leading tax practices
The repeal of Libya’s statute of limitations and tougher enforcement leave taxpayers navigating a high-stakes choice between conciliation and litigation
All the tax partners elevated across the UK, US and Singapore were private client specialists, continuing a market trend of intense investment and competition
Rolf van de Velde, dubbed ‘an expert chosen by experts’, is tasked with scaling Reptune’s self-service compliance offering
The newly combined firm brings together more than 3,500 practitioners across 52 offices, with flagship hubs in Seattle, London, Sydney and New York.
Building a transparent culture, prioritising internal promotions and being different from the big four are all key features of A&M Tax’s ambitious plans for India
ITR’s Indirect Tax Forum 2026 showed why harmonisation remains elusive, advisers must raise their game, and ‘everyone’s data is rubbish’
The firm’s board has reportedly asked Kevin Burrowes to continue until 2028 as the KPMG Australia scandal raises expectations of regulatory reform
Gift this article