Australia’s Federal Budget 2025–26: key takeaways

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Australia’s Federal Budget 2025–26: key takeaways

Sponsored by

Sponsored_Firms_piper.png
Australia flag.jpg

Kelvin Yuen of DLA Piper Australia summarises proposed changes to the managed investment trust regime, the deferral of a mooted foreign resident capital gains tax measure, and increased funding for the Australian Taxation Office

The 2025–26 Australian Federal Budget was handed down on Tuesday, March 25 2025. While the Budget primarily focused on cost-of-living relief measures, it also proposed to clarify the managed investment trust (MIT) regime and to increase funding to the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) to ensure tax compliance, with a focus on multinationals and large taxpayers.

Proposed changes to the managed investment trust regime

The MIT withholding regime provides concessional withholding tax rates on distributions from eligible Australian trust vehicles. Under the MIT concessional withholding regime, distributions to foreign investors who are resident in a country that has an exchange of information agreement with Australia are subject to a final withholding tax of:

  • 10% if the MIT is a "clean building MIT"; or

  • 15% for other MITs.

One of the requirements for MIT status is that the trust must satisfy the definition of a "managed investment scheme" under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth). This definition requires that people contribute money and pool their contributions in a common enterprise to produce financial benefits, but the members do not have day-to-day control over the operation of the scheme. Generally, the view is that a trust must have at least two members to satisfy the “pooling” of contributions requirement.

The ATO has become aware of arrangements involving the restructure of existing trusts or other inward investment structures to inappropriately access the MIT withholding regime (commonly referred to as “captive” MITs). In March 2025, the ATO released a taxpayer alert (TA 2025/1) on this issue.

TA 2025/1 identifies concerns with restructurings that result in a trust that is ultimately owned by a single foreign investor having at least two investors to satisfy the “pooled investment” requirements for a managed investment scheme. The ATO indicated that the general tax anti-avoidance rules under Part IVA of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 could apply to MIT restructures that have a single ultimate foreign owner. Furthermore, the ATO noted that any existing “captive” MIT structures could also be subject to ATO scrutiny where there is a material new investment or ownership change.

Shortly after the release of TA 2025/1, the assistant treasurer issued a clarifying response stating that the MIT rules will be amended to ensure that “legitimate investors can continue to access concessional withholding tax rates in Australia while strengthening guidelines to prevent misuse” and that “genuine, foreign based widely-held investors, such as pension funds” will still be able to access the MIT concessional withholding tax rates.

Further to this announcement, it was confirmed in the Budget that laws will be enacted to “clarify” the uncertainty surrounding the availability of the MIT concessions for certain MIT structures and these amendments will apply retrospectively to fund payments from March 13 2025. While the draft legislation for these measures has not yet been released, it is hoped that the government will provide certainty and comfort to legitimate structures involving widely held foreign entities.

Any existing or proposed MIT structures that are ultimately owned by a single foreign investor should monitor the progress of these changes and ATO activity in this area to determine whether the MIT eligibility of their structures could be at risk.

For completeness, the government also announced the deferral of the clean building MIT concessions (of 10%) to data centres and warehouses from July 1 2025 to the first January 1, April 1, July 1, or October 1 after the relevant act receives royal assent. These concessions were first announced in the 2023–24 Federal Budget. No draft legislation has yet been issued for these amendments.

Deferred start date for foreign resident CGT measures

The Australian government has deferred the start date of the proposed foreign resident capital gains tax (CGT) measure, referred to as the “Strengthening the foreign resident capital gains tax regime”, from July 1 2025 to the first January 1, April 1, July 1, or October 1 after the relevant act receives royal assent.

The proposed measures were initially announced in the 2024–25 Budget and were subject to a consultation process in July and August 2024, but no draft legislation has since been issued. The proposed measures included:

  • Clarifying and broadening the types of assets on which foreign residents are subject to CGT to include assets that have a “close economic connection” to Australian land;

  • Amending the principal asset test to include a 365-day testing period, rather than the existing point-in-time test, which applies at the time of disposal; and

  • Requiring foreign residents disposing of shares and other membership interests exceeding A$20 million in value to notify the ATO, prior to the transaction being executed.

Increased funding for ATO compliance activities

The Budget announced that the Australian government will provide A$999 million of additional funding over the next four years to the ATO to extend and expand tax compliance activities, with a key focus on multinationals and other large taxpayers. These Australian taxpayers should review the current tax compliance requirements and be prepared for potential ATO review and audit activity.

Previously announced but unenacted measures

While the Budget provided an update on certain previously announced but unenacted measures, it did not provide further details regarding the previously announced reforms relating to:

  • Corporate and individual tax residency;

  • Penalty regimes relating to the mischaracterisation of royalites, interest, or dividends; and

  • The expansion of Australia’s general anti-avoidance rules.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The threat of 50% tariffs on Brazilian goods coincides with new Brazilian legal powers to adopt retaliatory economic measures, local experts tell ITR
The country’s chancellor appears to have backtracked from previous pillar two scepticism; in other news, Donald Trump threatened Russia with 100% tariffs
In its latest G20 update, the OECD also revealed tense discussions with the US where the ‘significant threat’ of Section 899 was highlighted
The tax agency has increased compliance yield from wealthy individuals but cannot identify how much tax is paid by UK billionaires, the committee also claimed
Saffery cautioned that documentation requirements in new government proposals must be limited if medium-sized companies are not exempted from TP
The global minimum tax deal is not viable without US participation, Friedrich Merz has argued
Section 899 of the ‘one big beautiful’ bill would have spelled disaster for many international investors into the US, but following its shelving, attention turns to the fate of the OECD’s pillars
DLA Piper’s co-head of tax for the US and Latin America tells ITR about her fervent belief in equal access to the law, loving yoga, and paternal inspirations
Tax expert Craig Hillier agrees with the comparison of pillar two to using a sledgehammer to crack a nut
The amount is reported to be up 57% from the £5.6bn that the UK tax agency believes was underpaid in the previous year
Gift this article