VAT on online events to become a little easier to manage (really?)

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

VAT on online events to become a little easier to manage (really?)

Sponsored by

logo.png
illuminated-3309188.jpg

Fernando Matesanz of Spanish VAT Services says changes to the application of VAT concerning online events are intended to simplify the rules but could create further headaches

An article by Spanish VAT Services published in 2022 pointed out that determining the place of supply for VAT on online events has always been a controversial issue. Since participation in such events takes place via the internet, the event organiser and the participants could be located anywhere in the world. This circumstance can create significant complications for the determination of the VAT applicable to these services.

In this regard, articles 53 (B2B supplies) and 54 (B2C supplies) of the EU’s VAT Directive state that access to scientific, entertainment, educational, or other similar events should be taxed for VAT where the event is actually taking place. When speaking about an online event, it is not always easy to determine the place where the event is taking place. In fact, in some cases it can be tremendously complex.

We have all attended online events where speakers connect from different parts of the world to do their presentations. The same goes for attendees, who can access the event from anywhere in the world. Things can be even more complicated if it is a hybrid event in which there are onsite and online attendees and speakers. In these cases, applying the provisions of articles 53 and 54 of the VAT Directive can certainly be complicated.

Changes to the application of VAT concerning online event fees

To clarify the application of VAT to the fees paid to access these types of events, Council Directive (EU) 2022/542 introduces brief but important modifications in articles 53 and 54 of the VAT Directive, effective from January 1 2025.

With regard to Article 53 of the VAT Directive, the following text is added: “This Article shall not apply to admission to the events referred to in the first paragraph where the attendance is virtual.”

Additionally, the following text is added to Article 54: “Where the services and ancillary services relate to activities which are streamed or otherwise made virtually available, the place of supply shall, however, be the place where the non-taxable person is established, has his permanent address or usually resides.”

The above implies that the destination principle applies in the case of online events irrespective of whether the attendees are VAT-able persons.

The following shall be considered by the organiser of an online event from 2025:

  • If the recipient is a taxable person, the supplier does not have to charge VAT to their customer when both are established in different EU member states (VAT will be reverse charged by the customer). In the event that the supplier and the recipient are established in the same member state, the supplier must charge domestic VAT.

  • Where the recipient is a private individual, the taxation for VAT will be in the member state where the person accessing the event is established or domiciled, with the supplier being obliged to charge the corresponding VAT to their customer. The supplier could make use of the One-Stop Shop return.

Complications and potential VAT headaches for online event organisers

The above points to a standard situation that can certainly occur in practice in many cases, but the truth is that, as commented above, additional complications may arise in cases where a hybrid event takes place, which is now common. In this case, the service provider may need to differentiate between one type of attendee and the other. For onsite attendees, the VAT to apply will be that of the country where the event is taking place, while for online attendees, the rules described above would apply.

The situation can be even more complicated, since all the above is applicable when we refer to ‘events’. Although it may seem obvious, a priori, the truth is that this, like many things in VAT, has been the subject of discussion and controversy.

Following the European Court of Justice case C-647/17 (Srf Konsulterna), the VAT Committee agreed that these types of activities should be considered events as long as their duration is not excessive (one week is given as a guideline). In other words, the longer the duration is, the less likely it is to qualify as an event.

If we are not dealing with an event, none of the above applies and we should, therefore, apply the general VAT provisions; namely, those established in articles 44 and 45 of the VAT Directive. As we can see, when organising an online event, you must make a series of decisions if you do not want VAT to become a true headache.

VAT and online events… Who said it would be easy?

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The threat of 50% tariffs on Brazilian goods coincides with new Brazilian legal powers to adopt retaliatory economic measures, local experts tell ITR
The country’s chancellor appears to have backtracked from previous pillar two scepticism; in other news, Donald Trump threatened Russia with 100% tariffs
In its latest G20 update, the OECD also revealed tense discussions with the US where the ‘significant threat’ of Section 899 was highlighted
The tax agency has increased compliance yield from wealthy individuals but cannot identify how much tax is paid by UK billionaires, the committee also claimed
Saffery cautioned that documentation requirements in new government proposals must be limited if medium-sized companies are not exempted from TP
The global minimum tax deal is not viable without US participation, Friedrich Merz has argued
Section 899 of the ‘one big beautiful’ bill would have spelled disaster for many international investors into the US, but following its shelving, attention turns to the fate of the OECD’s pillars
DLA Piper’s co-head of tax for the US and Latin America tells ITR about her fervent belief in equal access to the law, loving yoga, and paternal inspirations
Tax expert Craig Hillier agrees with the comparison of pillar two to using a sledgehammer to crack a nut
The amount is reported to be up 57% from the £5.6bn that the UK tax agency believes was underpaid in the previous year
Gift this article