International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Portuguese tax authorities clarify guidance on tax representation for non-residents

Sponsored by


A recently issued decree addresses the uncertainty surrounding the obligation to appoint a tax representative in Portugal but some issues are yet to be resolved, reports Ana Carrilho Ribeiro of Morais Leitão.

The Portuguese tax authorities (PTA) issued Decree No 90054 (the Decree) on June 6 2022, which clarified the situations that trigger the mandatory appointment of a tax representative for non-resident entities and single taxpayers.

The appointment of a tax representative domiciled in Portuguese territory is required by law in certain cases in which it is determined that a non-resident (regardless of being a Portuguese citizen) must comply with the tax obligations under Portuguese law. This facilitates communication between the PTA and the non-resident taxpayer, and allows access to certain rights before the PTA.

The tax representative is generally not responsible for taxes owed by the represented taxpayer – except for VAT in certain circumstances – unless it is also the latter’s administrator for tax purposes (gestor de bens e direitos). In any case, the tax representative shall represent the taxpayer in the exercise of any rights before the PTA, such as for litigation purposes, compliance obligations and the receipt of correspondence.

Furthermore, the law sets forth that taxpayers who are tax resident in a jurisdiction of the EU or the European Economic Area (EEA) are not required to appoint a tax representative. However, this exception is sometimes disregarded by the local tax officers, who often demand the appointment of a tax representative to issue a Portuguese taxpayer number (NIF) for EU resident taxpayers.

Tax representation obligations

The Decree clarifies that the mandatory appointment of a tax representative should be limited to cases where a non-resident taxpayer was, or is expected to be, required to fulfil obligations or exercise rights before the PTA, thus establishing a legal relationship for tax purposes. The PTA also mentions that, after the attribution of a NIF to a non-resident taxpayer, the latter may establish a legal relationship for tax purposes with the PTA. The appointment of a tax representative is required in the following circumstances:

  • Becoming the owner of Portuguese real estate or of vehicles registered in Portugal;

  • Entering into an employment contract in Portugal; or

  • Starting an activity as a self-employed person in Portuguese territory.

As mentioned, this obligation does not apply to tax residents in EU/EEA countries.

The obligation to appoint a tax representative also applies to resident taxpayers changing their tax domicile to a jurisdiction located outside the EU and the EEA. The taxpayer will remain liable to fulfil their obligations or exercise their rights before the PTA.

Additionally, the Decree denotes that the appointment of a tax representative is not mandatory if the following criteria are cumulatively met:

  • The taxpayer is domiciled, for tax purposes, in Portugal, the EU or the EEA;

  • The taxpayer does not meet the requirements to be considered a Portuguese tax resident;

  • The taxpayer is not considered liable for Portuguese taxes; and

  • The taxpayer is not bound to the fulfilment of compliance obligations and does not intend to exercise any rights before the PTA.

In the author’s view, this statement raises certain doubts, when analysed together with the law and the remaining guidelines contained in the Decree, considering that the criteria are not cumulative. As an example, if a taxpayer is not liable for tax, is not bound to the fulfilment of compliance obligations and does not intend to exercise any rights before the PTA, they should not be required to appoint a tax representative.

In addition, taxpayers that are bound to fulfil one or more tax obligations, but are resident in the EU or EEA, should also be exempt from appointing a tax representative.

Standardisation of procedures

As a general rule, after determination that a tax representative must be appointed, the non-resident taxpayer has 15 days to comply. However, where an individual initiates a professional activity in Portugal, the tax representative must be appointed immediately upon the registration of the activity with the PTA.

A tax representative may be appointed by electronic means on the PTA’s website, or at a tax office or Citizen’s Bureau (Loja do Cidadão). Failure to appoint a tax representative, where mandatory, may be punished with a penalty ranging from €75 to €7,500. Furthermore, the non-resident taxpayer will be prevented from exercising their rights before the PTA until such appointment is concluded.

This guidance was much needed, as different approaches were commonly adopted by the local tax offices, leading to uncertainty with regard to the legal obligations of non-resident taxpayers.

Even considering the lack of clarity in certain parts of the Decree’s guidelines, it is expected that its issuance will promote the standardisation of the required procedures for non-tax residents. This will allow a higher degree of predictability for foreign entities and individuals dealing with the PTA.

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The Canadian proprietor of Canary Wharf and Manhattan West faces accusations of avoiding tax through subsidiaries in Bermuda and beyond.
The Department of Finance Canada has put forward a package of transfer pricing reforms to clarify existing provisions and address what it says is a disproportionate loss of tax revenue.
Developments included the end of Saudi Arabia’s tax amnesty, Poland’s VAT battle with the EU, the Indirect Tax Forum, India’s WTO complaint, and more.
Charlotte Sallabank and Christy Wilson of Katten UK look at the Premier League's use of 'dual representation' contracts for tax matters.
Shareholders are set to vote on whether the asset management firm will adopt public CbCR, amid claims of tax avoidance.
US lawmakers averted a default on debt by approving the Fiscal Responsibility Act, but this deal may consolidate the Biden tax reforms rather than undermine them.
In a letter to the Australian Senate, the firm has provided the names of all 67 staff who received confidential emails but has not released them publicly.
David Pickstone and Anastasia Nourescu of Stewarts review the facts and implications of Ørsted’s appeal at the Upper Tribunal.
The Internal Revenue Service will lose the funding as part of the US debt limit deal, while Amazon UK reaps the benefits of the 130% ‘super-deduction’.
The European Commission wanted to make an example of US companies like Apple, but its crusade against ‘sweetheart’ tax rulings may be derailed at the CJEU.