All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws. © 2022 ITR is part of the Euromoney Institutional Investor PLC group.

NZ Labour Party promises digital services tax if international consensus not reached

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-russel-mcveagh.png
The Senate has established rules surrounding digital nomads

Brendan Brown and Mitchell Fraser of Russell McVeagh consider the role of tax in political parties' manifestos prior to New Zealand’s October 2020 general election, with a particular focus on a possible digital services tax.

The Labour Party, which is the larger of the two parties in New Zealand's coalition government, has released its tax policy ahead of the upcoming New Zealand general election to be held on October 17 2020. The aspect of the policy that has attracted the most attention from voters is a proposal to increase the top personal tax rate from 33% to 39%, with the new 39% rate applying to income over NZ$180,000 (US$120,000) per annum.

Of arguably greater significance to businesses, though, is the Party's policy on the taxation of multinational enterprises. The Party has said it will "proactively work" with the OECD on "the issue of multinational corporations not paying their fair share of tax". However, if a multilateral solution cannot be found, the Party has said it "will work towards implementation of a digital services tax".

Design of a digital services tax

The Labour Party has not released details as to the form of a digital services tax (DST) except to say that the rate at which the DST applies would be set "once the international position is clear". It is reasonable to assume, though, that a unilateral DST would be based on the framework set out in the government discussion document: 'Options for taxing the digital economy', which was released in June 2019.

In that discussion document, the government proposed a DST at the rate of 3% on the New Zealand proportion of a multinational group's gross revenue from certain digital businesses, including intermediation platforms, social media platforms, content sharing sites and search engines. The discussion document proposed that the DST would apply to businesses with a global consolidated annual turnover of at least €750m (US$887m), and annual revenues attributable to New Zealand from activities within the scope of the DST of at least NZ$3.5m (US$2.3m).

The DST proposed in the discussion document was projected to raise between NZ$30m and NZ$80m (US$20m to US$54m) in tax annually. The government's total tax-take is over NZ$80b, meaning that even at the top end of the range, a DST could be expected to represent no more than 0.1% of the government's total tax-take.

Next steps

New Zealand has a mixed member proportional electoral system under which a political party's representation in parliament broadly reflects the proportion of votes cast for that party nationally. Ordinarily, no one party secures an outright majority in parliament, meaning a major party will usually require the support of one or more smaller parties to secure a majority and form a government.

The Green Party, who are a support partner of the coalition government, proposes in its tax policy to close "loopholes and areas of under-taxation" for "digital giants". The Green Party proposes either a unilateral DST of 3% on gross revenues attributable to New Zealand users, or a multilateral solution through the OECD "if international progress can be achieved".

The leader of the largest of the opposition parties, the National Party, has recently acknowledged the challenge of applying existing tax rules to the digital economy, stating that “[s]ome of these big multinationals now are paying almost no tax anywhere, really, including New Zealand…".  The National Party has, however, promised to introduce no new taxes in its first term of government, if elected, and the party's leader has suggested that it would be unlikely to implement a unilateral DST.

Commentators have expressed concern at the prospect of New Zealand implementing a unilateral DST. The DST is seen as problematic from a tax policy perspective: it is a tax on turnover rather than profit, it poses a high risk of double taxation since it is unlikely to be creditable against income tax, and it runs the risk of contravening New Zealand's obligations at international law (under double tax agreements or trade-related agreements). Moreover, other countries that have legislated, or even proposed, a unilateral DST have drawn the threat of retaliatory measures from the US.

With progress at OECD level looking uncertain, there is a real prospect of the Labour Party, if it forms part of the government after the election, proceeding to implement a unilateral DST. It is to be hoped that the government would carefully consider the costs and risks of implementing a DST, in light of the relatively small amount of tax revenue a DST would raise.

 

Brendan Brown

T: +64 4 819 7748

E: brendan.brown@russellmcveagh.com



Mitchell Fraser

T: +64 4 819 7335

E: mitchell.fraser@russellmcveagh.com

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The European Parliament raises concerns over unanimity in voting on pillar two, while protests break out over tax reform in Colombia.
Ramesh Khaitan speaks to reporter Siqalane Taho about tax morality, transfer pricing regulations, Indian tax developments, and the OECD’s two-pillar solution.
Join ITR and KPMG China at 10am BST on October 19 as they discuss the personal, employment, and corporate tax-related implications of employees working from overseas.
Tricentis and Boehringer Ingelheim, along with a European Commission TP specialist, criticised the complexity of pillar one rules and their scope at an ITR event.
Speakers at ITR’s Managing Tax Disputes Summit said taxpayers can still face lengthy TP audits, despite strong documentation preparation
Gig economy companies in New Zealand will need to fully account and become liable for the goods and services tax of underlying suppliers on their platforms, under new proposals.
Join ITR and Thomson Reuters at 2pm (UAE) / 11am (UK) on October 13 as they discuss how businesses can prepare for Tax Administration 3.0 and future-proof against changes such as e-invoicing and increasing digitisation.
ITR has partnered with global TP leaders from Deloitte to discuss transfer pricing controversy around the globe, and to share advice on how to navigate an increasingly uncertain and risky TP landscape.
Sources say they are not satisfied with pillar one protections in the marketing and distribution safe harbour, even though it was designed to give businesses greater tax certainty.
Political support for qualified majority voting is at a peak as unanimity rules continue to block the European Council from passing a directive on pillar two.
We use cookies to provide a personalized site experience.
By continuing to use & browse the site you agree to our Privacy Policy.
I agree