All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws. © 2022 ITR is part of the Euromoney Institutional Investor PLC group.

Taxing energy in Portugal: The case of the Energy Sector Extraordinary Contribution

Sponsored by

The decision comes as good news for the DNOs involved in the electricity supply to free consumers

Filipe de Vasconcelos Fernandes of Vieira de Almeida weighs up the relevance of Portugal continuing to utilise the Energy Sector Extraordinary Contribution in 2020.

General framework

The Energy Sector Extraordinary Contribution (CESE) was created by Law No. 83-C/2013 of December 31 (State Budget Law for 2014), when Portugal was going through a serious economic and financial crisis. It was formed in the period after the subprime crisis in the USA and during the emergence of the sovereign debt crisis in Europe.

However, it is possible to identify specific energy policy objectives for CESE, regardless of the context of the economic and financial crisis in which it was created.

From a strictly energy policy perspective, CESE has the following objectives:

(i) Firstly, the reduction in the tariff deficit of the National Electric System (SEN), which is the result of shortfalls of revenues in the electricity system, which arise when the tariffs for the regulated components of the retail electricity price are set below the corresponding costs borne by the energy companies (globally, as a result of legislative measures to limit energy prices); and

(ii) Secondly, the promotion of the systemic sustainability of the sector, through the financing of a broad set of social and environmental policies and the adoption of some measures related to energy efficiency.

The revenue collected from CESE is allocated to a public fund, the Fund for Systemic Sustainability of the Energy Sector (FSSSE), which should implement measures to reduce the tariff deficit of the SEN and promote the systemic sustainability policies of the sector.

The universe of taxpayers in this extraordinary contribution is very wide and includes energy producers using renewable sources – which, as of 2019, are no longer exempt if they do not operate in a market regime (that is, if they do not benefit from some guaranteed remuneration regime, such as the well-known ‘feed-in tariff’).

CESE is charged on the taxpayers' assets (both tangible and intangible assets and also some financial assets) at a general rate of 0.85%, with some special rates for certain categories of taxpayers, namely in the natural gas sector.

The implementation of the Energy Sector Extraordinary Contribution and its metamorphosis

For the implementation of this Extraordinary Contribution, the Portuguese legislator followed the archetype of ‘environmental tax’ well known in the OECD context and also used by Eurostat.

Therefore, once again from the perspective of the Portuguese legislator, CESE is a tax measure that aims to solve a problem of detrimental externalities: 

(i) On the one hand, the negative externalities associated with the tariff deficit of the SEN – which, from the perspective of the Portuguese legislator, had been caused by taxpayers; and

(ii) On the other hand, the positive externalities associated with social and environmental policies and the adoption of some measures related to energy efficiency – that would have benefited taxpayers who, having paid nothing, had a new source of additional income.

Despite the tax and energy policy objectives of the Portuguese legislator, the reality and experience of recent years has shown that CESE cannot pursue these type of purposes related to the existence of detrimental externalities:

(i) Firstly, the tariff deficit of the SEN was not caused by the taxpayers nor is it related to its asset structure; and

(ii) Secondly, so far it is not at all clear what kind of environmental or energy efficiency policies have already been implemented using CESE revenue.

At the same time, it is currently proven that CESE is not an extraordinary measure (effective since 2014 and its regime has been extended in all the state budget laws until 2020). 

All of this considered, among other aspects, the Portuguese legislator is no longer able to justify CESE's permanence in the Portuguese tax system. 

Additionally, this tax measure has serious problems both from a legal and constitutional perspective.

The starting point is the qualification of this tax measure: slightly beyond the tripartite view of tax measures accepted by the Portuguese Constitution – between taxes in the strict sense, fees or financial contributions – CESE fits in the category of ‘special contributions’, a category whose basic structure is very close to the existence of detrimental externalities.

The main characteristic of this type of ‘special contributions’ is its extraordinary and temporary character, very close to the existence of detrimental externality itself. Therefore, when the legislator fails to establish a link between the identified externalities and the taxpayers' behavior or assets structure, the ‘special contribution’ created is no longer justified under the Constitution.

Sooner or later, CESE will be eliminated from the Portuguese tax system. The market is looking forward to seeing how the Constitutional Court will assess the new arguments put forward to support CESE's unconstitutionality.

Filipe de Vasconcelos Fernandes

T: +351 213 113 400

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The European Parliament raises concerns over unanimity in voting on pillar two, while protests break out over tax reform in Colombia.
Ramesh Khaitan speaks to reporter Siqalane Taho about tax morality, transfer pricing regulations, Indian tax developments, and the OECD’s two-pillar solution.
Join ITR and KPMG China at 10am BST on October 19 as they discuss the personal, employment, and corporate tax-related implications of employees working from overseas.
Tricentis and Boehringer Ingelheim, along with a European Commission TP specialist, criticised the complexity of pillar one rules and their scope at an ITR event.
Speakers at ITR’s Managing Tax Disputes Summit said taxpayers can still face lengthy TP audits, despite strong documentation preparation
Gig economy companies in New Zealand will need to fully account and become liable for the goods and services tax of underlying suppliers on their platforms, under new proposals.
Join ITR and Thomson Reuters at 2pm (UAE) / 11am (UK) on October 13 as they discuss how businesses can prepare for Tax Administration 3.0 and future-proof against changes such as e-invoicing and increasing digitisation.
ITR has partnered with global TP leaders from Deloitte to discuss transfer pricing controversy around the globe, and to share advice on how to navigate an increasingly uncertain and risky TP landscape.
Sources say they are not satisfied with pillar one protections in the marketing and distribution safe harbour, even though it was designed to give businesses greater tax certainty.
Political support for qualified majority voting is at a peak as unanimity rules continue to block the European Council from passing a directive on pillar two.
We use cookies to provide a personalized site experience.
By continuing to use & browse the site you agree to our Privacy Policy.
I agree