Poland: Poland introduces substance test for payments to recipients abroad
International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Poland: Poland introduces substance test for payments to recipients abroad

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-mddp.png
ib-poland.jpg

Monika Marta Dziedzic, legal and tax advisor at MDDP, evaluates Poland’s new measures concerning payments to recipients abroad subject to a certain amount of withholding tax and what criteria must be fulfilled in order for an exemption or reduction to be applied.

As stated in the April issue of ITR, payments from Poland to a foreign entity subject to withholding tax (WHT) exceeding PLN 2 million ($500,000), will be subject to a standard 19% WHT rate. Such a recipient qualifying for an exemption or reduced WHT treaty rate, or in some cases WHT remitter, can apply for a WHT refund. The threshold will apply to one recipient per year. The date of introduction of these rules was deferred to January 2020.

However, already from the beginning of 2019, in order to apply the reduced WHT rates or exemptions from WHT, Polish authorities require the remitters to prove that the recipient is a beneficial owner of most types of the received payments, including interest, royalties, dividends and, according to some interpretations, also service fees.

The Polish definition of the beneficial owner differs a lot from the OECD standard. In addition to regular factors, such as not acting as an agent, trustee or intermediary, Polish law requires that the beneficial owner runs a so-called genuine business activity as specified by Polish law. This definition, in particular, requires taking into account the following:

  • Whether there is an undertaking in the country of the tax residency of the recipient of payment within which the entity actually pursues operations that constitute an economic activity, including in particular whether said entity has premises, qualified personnel and equipment used in the economic activity at its disposition;

  • Whether the entity in question does not constitute a structure whose functioning is not based on economic reasons;

  • Whether the scope of activity of a given entity is commensurate with its actual premises, personnel or equipment that it has at its disposition (consequently, for example, whether the personnel of the entity in question corresponds to the character of said entity and to the scale of its activity: e.g. one person is unable to take effective managerial decisions for more than a dozen companies conducting an economic activity);

  • Whether the arrangements concluded are consistent with the economic reality, are economically sound and do not stand in stark contrast to the general economic interests of the entity in question;

  • Whether the entity independently performs its essential economic functions using its own resources, including managers who are present on the premises.

The conditions for conducting a genuine economic activity will differ for manufacture and trade companies, service providers and companies involved in what is broadly understood as financial activity, such as investment or holding operations. However, in practice, proving genuine business activity in case of special purpose organisations may be problematic. Therefore it is worthwhile checking, if holding and group function companies like shared service centres, cash pool leaders or recharge vehicles especially receiving payments from Poland meet the Polish substance test. If not, the implication is not only that WHT will have to be charged at the standard 19% or 20% rate but also that the refund will not occur so easily.

MDDP Poland

T: +48 (22) 322 68 88

E: monika.dziedzic@mddp.pl

W: www.mddp.pl

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The ‘big four’ firm has threatened to legally pursue those behind the letter, which has been circulating on social media
The guidelines have been established in the wake of multiple tax scandals and controversies that have rocked the accounting profession
KPMG Netherlands’ former head of assurance also received a permanent bar and $150,000 fine; in other news, asset management firm BlackRock lost a $13.5bn UK tax appeal
The new, fully integrated office will also offer M&A, dispute resolution, IP and corporate tax services
The new guidance concerns a recent 1% excise tax on the repurchases of corporate stock for both US and certain foreign companies
Interpath has hired a managing partner from rival accounting firm BDO to lead the new operation
Survey results of over 28,000 in-house lawyers reveal that American in-house counsel place a higher value on the reputation of external advisers than their peers elsewhere
In an exclusive interview with ITR, Andrew Leigh also endorsed new legislation designed to prevent multinationals using complex corporate structures to reduce taxes
Nick Crama and Parwesh Bissumbhar, senior director and manager respectively at Alvarez & Marsal, outline practical advice for real estate managers to comply with DAC6 regulations
The finalists for the 13th annual awards revealed
Gift this article