Israel: Tax authorities provide certainty on foreign fund investments

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Israel: Tax authorities provide certainty on foreign fund investments

Sponsored by

YETAX logo.JPG
israel.jpg

The stake of foreign investment in the Israeli high-tech industry reached 77% of total capital raised in 2018, and 30 new venture funds were born in 2018, raising a record $2.6 billion compared to ‘only’ $1.6 billion in 2017.

The stake of foreign investment in the Israeli high-tech industry reached 77% of total capital raised in 2018, and 30 new venture funds were born in 2018, raising a record $2.6 billion compared to 'only' $1.6 billion in 2017. In 2019, the Israeli tax authorities are chipping in 'a share', by releasing the revised rules for tax-favourable arrangements regarding foreign equity and venture funds.

For more than two decades, a tax exemption for gains by non-resident investors on shares in Israeli companies has been in effect. The expansion of this exemption, in 2009, did not alter the requirement that shares sold should not belong to a 'permanent establishment' in Israel and that Israeli situs real estate does not form the larger part of the company's asset value. The first requirement would threaten the exemption on investments though funds supervised by a local fund or investment management; local professional involvement would risk qualification of a 'permanent establishment'. Against this backdrop, and while aware of the importance of foreign risk capital as 'oxygen' for Israel's industrial advancement, the Israel tax authorities would regularly provide terms for relief to investment funds, on a case-by-case basis, in accordance with the intentions of section 16A of Israel's Tax Ordinance (no double taxation for foreign investors no matter whether resident in a treaty country or not). When in 2014 the State Comptroller pointed out that the tax authorities might be exceeding their authority by the 'foreign funds ruling policy' the process of introspection resulted in publication of two new circulars mid-2018.

In the guidelines for tax relief for venture capital funds (2018/9 VCF) and for private equity funds (2018/10 PEF), the Israeli tax authorities put in writing the terms for exemption from gains tax for foreign investments, relief from tax obligations on the fund itself and the tax position of the actual fund management, but in a new jacket.

A fund with an aggregate capital of $10 million, counting at least 10 unrelated limited partner investors (LPs), of whom none are connected to the general partner managing the fund (GP), each holding at the most 20% of the equity in the fund (one investor may hold up to 35%), while foreign investors must hold at least 30% of fund equity (and at least $5 million), can request for confirmation of the exemption from tax of its foreign LPs. The fund is managed by the GP and the limited partners do not participate in the management. Limited partners who hold more than 4% of the fund rights cannot have access to more than 10% of any rights in the GP. Note, a limited – anchor investor – partner who has rights in the GP of not more than 10% of control in the GP may claim a tax exemption.

The funds eligible for a ruling must have at least $10 million 'qualifying investment', i.e. an Israeli company (or a foreign company of which most of the assets or activity, directly or indirectly, is situated in Israel) of which the main business contributed positively to Israel's trade balance, ranging from actual manufacturing to high tech. Of the amount of risk participation by the fund, at least $6 million must be tied up in Israeli R&D companies holding IP, or a foreign parent company with an Israel subsidiary which holds IP being developed. Alternatively, at least 50% of the positions is in qualified investments and at least 30% thereof are in above described intellectual property (IP) holding companies. The fund may have up to 25% of its aggregate capital commitments (after deduction of management charges) in one single portfolio company and not more than 20% of its Israeli investment may be in public companies.

The foreign investors and the GP in a private equity fund regarding investment gains (with respect to its foreign investors) are exempt from tax. Other income from qualified investments such as dividend income will be subject to a 15% tax rate for individuals while corporate investors may be charged 23% source (and reduced by any applicable tax treaty). When the LP is a foreign 'exempt' investor (public institutions, provident funds and pension funds) resident in a treaty country where they are exempt from taxation, Israel also exempts the proceeds of their investments. Interest income is subject to a tax rate of 15%, 20% or even 50% in limited cases for individuals, while corporates pay 23% (the corporate tax rate), again subject to further reduction under a tax treaty. Obviously, income from investments in non-Israel entities are not subject to taxation in Israel and foreign investors are exempt from filing any tax returns. Foreign owners of GP rights will be charged 15% on their stake in any carried interest in connection with the Israel investments and tax may be refunded if not creditable in the residency country.

The foreign investors and GP of a VCF are exempt from tax on capital gains, interest and dividends, provided 75% of investment is by way of issuance of shares or other convertible securities. Israeli and foreign, exempt investors may be exempt pending fulfilment of treaty and domestic tax law. Carried interest of the GP rights holders is as with the PEF.

A PEF and VCF with fewer than 10 investors must pay a 15% tax rate. In both cases, the Israeli fund manager will be subject to regular tax with respect to carried interest. Most active funds understand that the VAT authorities are also willing to support an -efficient arrangement and reduce the VAT cost of international fund constellations hosted by Israel.

Should a fund not exactly fit the requirements of the 2018 circulars, it may request that an appropriate relief or specific tax treatment relevant to the particular circumstances be determined.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Belt and Road Initiative countries face tax incentive conundrums due to pillar two, but relatively few countries would seek to scrap the project, ITR has heard
Hany Elnaggar examines how the OECD’s global minimum tax is reshaping the GCC’s investment incentive landscape, shifting the region from rate-based competition toward substance-driven economic positioning
The acquisition of a two-partner practice from Stephenson Harwood means that Charles Russell Speechlys has the largest private client team in Asia, the firm claimed
Complex and constantly shifting rules on global mobility mean ‘the risk is too great’ for staff to work abroad on personal time, EY’s Maureen Flood tells ITR
While it’s great that the OECD is alive to multinationals’ fears of being caught in a compliance trap, the ‘common understanding’ illustrates a worrying lack of readiness
Rising demand for specialist expertise has fuelled the growth in tax partner headcounts, Cain Dwyer found; in other news, Switzerland has been urged to reconsider pillar two
An OECD report on the taxation of the digital economy is expected by the end of 2026, according to the group of nations
Trophy assets are evolving from personal indulgences to structured investments, prompting family offices to prioritise tax efficiency, governance discipline, and cross-border compliance
As demand for complex, cross-border private client counsel spikes, Patrick McCormick sees opportunity in starting from scratch
As part of an exclusive global alliance, KPMG will become one of Anthropic’s ‘preferred consultants’ for private equity
Gift this article