International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Canada reinforces substance requirements in transfer pricing

Lake Louise large

Canada announced certain international tax changes in its 2018 federal budget. TP Week’s correspondents Norma Kraay and Phil Fortier of Deloitte in Canada consider commentary indicating a continued focus on transfer pricing by the government.

Canada’s 2018 federal budget, released February 27 2018, proposes new tax measures that will have an impact on multinational enterprises (MNEs). The changes with transfer pricing implications primarily involve extending the reassessment period in select circumstances as well as increased funding for the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA). The budget also highlights Canada’s commitment to reinforcing substance requirements and aligning transfer pricing outcomes with value creation, and reiterates that Canada has adopted the revised OECD transfer pricing guidelines.

Longer reassessment periods

Three of the tax measures announced in the budget are aimed at extending the period during which the CRA can issue a reassessment:                                                       

1.       The extension by three years of the reassessment period for income arising in connection with a foreign affiliate. By default, the CRA has a three or four-year period after the date of an initial assessment to make a reassessment. Currently, a three-year extended reassessment period is allowed in respect of a transaction involving the taxpayer and a related non-resident person. The proposed amendment broadens this extended reassessment period to include all income arising in connection with a taxpayer’s foreign affiliate. This change reflects the added complexity and difficulty in gathering information regarding foreign affiliates. This provision applies to taxation years beginning on or after February 27 2018.

2.       An expanded ‘stop-the-clock’ rule, designed to extend the reassessment period by the amount of time taken to contest any requirement for information issued, or compliance order sought, by the CRA. This rule may affect transfer pricing-related reassessment periods, especially since transfer pricing audits tend to be particularly complex and detailed, potentially involving significant information requests, which may be in the form of requirements for information or compliance orders. This change will impact only challenges instituted after the law is enacted.

3.       Extending the reassessment period by an additional three years in situations where a taxpayer carries back a loss incurred as a result of a transaction with a non-arm’s length non-resident person. The change is intended to ensure that when a loss arises in a taxation year and is carried back to be used in a prior taxation year, the latter year will not become statute-barred before the CRA issues a reassessment in respect of the year in which the loss is incurred.

This change will impact only the carryback of losses incurred in taxation years that end on or after February 27 2018. The following example provided in the 2018-2019 federal budget document clarifies the change:

A loss arises in a taxpayer’s 2017 taxation year. The taxpayer carries back this loss and deducts it against income in its 2014 taxation year. In 2023, the CRA determines that the actual amount of the 2017 loss is less than the amount claimed as a consequence of an adjustment to a transaction involving a taxpayer and a non-resident person with whom the taxpayer does not deal at arm’s length.

Under existing rules, the 2014 taxation year would be statute-barred by the time of the reassessment in 2023. The proposed measures would ensure that in the situation described, the CRA would be able to reassess the 2014 taxation year to the extent that the reassessment relates to the adjustment of the loss carried back.

Additional CRA funding

The 2018 federal budget proposes to invest an additional CAD 90.6 million ($70 million) over five years to support the CRA in its efforts to prevent tax evasion and improve tax compliance. This additional funding builds on previous substantial increased investments, including the investment announced in the 2016 federal budget of CAD 444.4 million over five years, and the investment announced in the 2017 federal budget of an additional CAD 523.9 million over five years for these purposes. The 2016 budget noted that the additional funding would be used to hire additional auditors and specialists, develop a robust business intelligence infrastructure, increase verification activities, and improve the quality of investigative work that targets criminal tax evaders.

While some MNEs may be concerned that the frequency of audits will increase with increased CRA funding, it is also anticipated that the additional resources may improve the efficiency and quality of the CRA’s audits, which would benefit MNEs. It is anticipated that, among other things, the increased funding may be spent on hiring and training auditors to conduct principled and technically sound audits, as transfer pricing disputes rise in number and complexity.

Additional funding is also provided for the Tax Court of Canada, a welcome development that will assist in improving efficiency in dealing with disputes that must be settled by the courts. Therefore, while the number of transfer pricing audits may increase, taxpayers may experience more efficient audits, principled positions, and earlier resolution of disputes.


While the government did not introduce any other tax measures directly related to transfer pricing, it did reiterate that Canada has adopted the revised OECD transfer pricing guidelines and has played an important role in the base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) project.  However, some implementation questions remain. More detailed guidance from the Canadian government is expected, such as additional or revised CRA information circulars or transfer pricing memorandums.  While no changes or updates were announced, country-by-country reporting was also mentioned in the budget, reiterating that these reports will be an important tool in combatting BEPS by providing the CRA and other tax authorities with new information to better assess transfer pricing risks.

Next steps and issues to consider

The above measures, which extend the period of time for the CRA to reassess taxpayers, while enhancing the resources available to CRA, reemphasise the importance for Canadian taxpayers of maintaining clear and robust information and documentation relating to their foreign operations. This need is magnified when MNEs have personnel changes or systems and operational constraints in various jurisdictions, and face the challenge of responding to the CRA’s detailed queries about historical years in the course of an audit.   

Norma Kraay

Norma Kraay


Phil Canada

Phil Fortier

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The General Court reverses its position taken four years ago, while the UN discusses tax policy in New York.
Discussion on amount B under the first part of the OECD's two-pronged approach to international tax reform is far from over, if the latest consultation is anything go by.
Pillar two might be top of mind for many multinational companies, but the huge variations between countries’ readiness means getting ahead of the game now, argues Russell Gammon, chief solutions officer at Tax Systems.
ITR’s latest quarterly PDF is going live today, leading on the looming battle between the UN and the OECD for dominance in global tax policy.
Company tax changes are central to the German government’s plan to revive the economy, but sources say they miss the mark. Ralph Cunningham reports.
The winners of the ITR Americas Tax Awards have been announced for 2023!
There is a ‘huge demand’ for tax services in the Middle East, says new Clyde & Co partner Rachel Fox in an interview with ITR.
The ECB warns the tax could leave banks with weaker capital levels, while the UAE publishes guidance on its new corporate tax regime.
Caroline Setliffe and Ben Shem-Tov of Eversheds Sutherland give an overview of the US transfer pricing penalty regime and UK diverted profits tax considerations for multinational companies.
The result follows what EY said was one of the most successful years in the firm’s history.