News Briefs for October 20, 2016

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

News Briefs for October 20, 2016

China cropped

The latest transfer pricing news includes the updated Chinese APA programme, Indonesian plans for a lower tax rate, and UK concerns on proposed penalties.



China APA structure revised

   The State Administration of Taxation has issued guidelines on the administration of advance pricing agreements, according to KPMG.

   The rules require more detailed preparation from taxpayers prior to the formal application acceptance but still follow the six stage application process as the 2009 arrangement, including pre-filing meeting, intention, analysis and appraisal, formal application, negotiation and signing, and supervision of implementation.

   Announcement 64 will be effective from December 1 2016. Any APA applications that have not been formally accepted before that date will be considered under the new rules.

Indonesia to attract multinationals with lower tax rate

   Indonesian President Joko Widodo has said the next step to attract foreign direct investment to his country is to lower tax rates and simplify the tax system.

   In an interview with the Wall Street Journal, Widodo said he is considering lowering Indonesia’s tax rate to 17% to compete with neighbouring financial-hub Singapore. He also suggested making one of Indonesia’s islands a tax haven with minimal tax imposed on individuals and companies there.

   Indonesia’s government and president are keen to present a multinational-friendly tax environment however, it has struggled to reach its tax audit targets in recent years and in response the authorities have targeted multinationals in an attempt to increase revenue.

UK accountants angry at “draconian” measures

   The Chartered Institute of Taxation has described proposed penalties for advisers arranging tax avoidance schemes as “draconian and broad”, reports the Financial Times.

   The proposals, first introduced by former chancellor George Osborne, would see advisers facing fines of up-to 100% of the avoided tax if found guilty of constructing and advising on schemes for individuals and companies to avoid tax.

   The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales and the Law Society have also spoken out against the proposals. 



more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

There is a shocking discrepancy between professional services firms’ parental leave packages. Those that fail to get with the times risk losing out in the war for talent
Winston Taylor is expected to launch in May 2026 with more than 1,400 lawyers across the US, UK, Europe, Latin America and the Middle East
They are alleging that leaked tax information ‘unfairly tarnished’ their business operations; in other news, Davis Polk and Eversheds Sutherland made key tax hires
Overall revenues for the combined UK and Swiss firm inched up 2% to £3.6 billion despite a ‘challenging market’
In the first of a two-part series, experts from Khaitan & Co dissect a highly anticipated Indian Supreme Court ruling that marks a decisive shift in India’s international tax jurisprudence
The OECD profile signals Brazil is no longer a jurisdiction where TP can be treated as a mechanical compliance exercise, one expert suggests, though another highlights 'significant concerns'
Libya’s often-overlooked stamp duty can halt payments and freeze contracts, making this quiet tax a decisive hurdle for foreign investors to clear, writes Salaheddin El Busefi
Eugena Cerny shares hard-earned lessons from tax automation projects and explains how to navigate internal roadblocks and miscommunications
The Clifford Chance and Hyatt cases collectively confirm a fundamental principle of international tax law: permanent establishment is a concept based on physical and territorial presence
Australian government minister Andrew Leigh reflects on the fallout of the scandal three years on and looks ahead to regulatory changes
Gift this article