IRS threatens to penalise Caterpillar over profits earned from Swiss subsidiary

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

IRS threatens to penalise Caterpillar over profits earned from Swiss subsidiary

After investigating Caterpillar’s US tax returns, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is threatening to tax profits the company earned from its Swiss based subsidiary (Caterpillar SARL). Caterpillar claims nothing untoward took place and plans to challenge the IRS through the appeals process.

The IRS has proposed to tax profits generated from transactions of mechanical parts by Caterpillar SARL after investigating Caterpillar’s US tax returns for 2007 and 2009. The tax increases and additional penalties are expected to amount to around $1 billion.

Caterpillar SARL is located in Geneva and has been selling machines, engines and replacement parts to non-US dealers for more than 50 years. According to spokeswoman, Rachel Potts, the subsidiary employs several hundred employees in Switzerland and other countries to deal with non-US markets.

Caterpillar plans to contest the IRS’s proposed penalties. The company said it was confident it had complied with tax laws applicable to the parts transactions and did not foresee “a significant increase or decrease” to its tax benefits in the next year.

In a previous TPWeek article, chief tax officer and director for global tax and trade at Caterpillar, Robin Beran, voiced concerns, not over allegations of profit shifting, but over whether the company would get caught up in the reporting of its transactions because of what governments are expecting.

It appears Beran was right to be concerned.

This is not the first time Caterpillar has been questioned over its tax policy and overseas profits. In April 2014, a Senate panel held a hearing focusing on Caterpillar’s decision in 1999 to run its global parts business from Switzerland with tax rates as low as four percent.

The IRS is also disallowing $125 million of foreign tax credits from financings unrelated to the Swiss subsidiary.

Bigger picture

Caterpillar is one of several multinational companies whose overseas profits and taxes are being questioned by the IRS.

This comes as no surprise in the global tax climate at present. Governments are eager to demonstrate they are actively tackling profit shifting as the OECD’s base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) deadline draws near.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Using tax to enhance its standing as a funds location is behind Luxembourg’s measures aimed at clarifying ATAD 2 and making its carried interest regime more attractive
Encompassing everything from international scandals to seismic political events, it’s a privilege to cover the intriguing world of tax
In his newly created role, current SSA commissioner Bisignano will oversee all day-to-day IRS operations; in other news, Ryan has made its second acquisition in two weeks
In the age of borderless commerce, money flows faster than regulation. While digital platforms cross oceans in milliseconds, tax authorities often lag. Indonesia has decided it can wait no longer
The tariffs are disrupting global supply chains and creating a lot of uncertainty, tax expert Miguel Medeiros told ITR’s European Transfer Pricing Forum
Corporate counsel should combine deep technical knowledge with strategic dynamism, says Agarwal, winner of ITR’s EMEA In-house Indirect Tax Leader of the Year award
Luxembourg’s reform agenda continues at pace in 2025, with targeted measures for start-ups and alternative investment funds
Veteran Elizabeth Arrendale will lead the new advisory practice, which will support clients with M&A tax structuring, post-deal integration, and more
MAP cases keep increasing, and cases closed aren’t keeping pace with the number started, the OECD’s Sriram Govind also told an ITR summit
Nobody likes paperwork or paying money, but the assertion that legal accreditation doesn’t offer value to firms and clients alike is false
Gift this article