IRS threatens to penalise Caterpillar over profits earned from Swiss subsidiary

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

IRS threatens to penalise Caterpillar over profits earned from Swiss subsidiary

After investigating Caterpillar’s US tax returns, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is threatening to tax profits the company earned from its Swiss based subsidiary (Caterpillar SARL). Caterpillar claims nothing untoward took place and plans to challenge the IRS through the appeals process.

The IRS has proposed to tax profits generated from transactions of mechanical parts by Caterpillar SARL after investigating Caterpillar’s US tax returns for 2007 and 2009. The tax increases and additional penalties are expected to amount to around $1 billion.

Caterpillar SARL is located in Geneva and has been selling machines, engines and replacement parts to non-US dealers for more than 50 years. According to spokeswoman, Rachel Potts, the subsidiary employs several hundred employees in Switzerland and other countries to deal with non-US markets.

Caterpillar plans to contest the IRS’s proposed penalties. The company said it was confident it had complied with tax laws applicable to the parts transactions and did not foresee “a significant increase or decrease” to its tax benefits in the next year.

In a previous TPWeek article, chief tax officer and director for global tax and trade at Caterpillar, Robin Beran, voiced concerns, not over allegations of profit shifting, but over whether the company would get caught up in the reporting of its transactions because of what governments are expecting.

It appears Beran was right to be concerned.

This is not the first time Caterpillar has been questioned over its tax policy and overseas profits. In April 2014, a Senate panel held a hearing focusing on Caterpillar’s decision in 1999 to run its global parts business from Switzerland with tax rates as low as four percent.

The IRS is also disallowing $125 million of foreign tax credits from financings unrelated to the Swiss subsidiary.

Bigger picture

Caterpillar is one of several multinational companies whose overseas profits and taxes are being questioned by the IRS.

This comes as no surprise in the global tax climate at present. Governments are eager to demonstrate they are actively tackling profit shifting as the OECD’s base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) deadline draws near.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Countries which care about fair taxation of tech multinationals and equitable global distribution of wealth should back the UN’s tax framework, writes economist Abdelmalek Riad
The cuts disproportionately affected staff in certain positions, the report also found; in other news, MHA announced the €24m acquisition of Baker Tilly South East Europe
The plan aims to improve the efficiency, transparency, and effectiveness of direct tax administration in India
Meanwhile, South Africa’s finance minister has accepted a court decision on suspending a VAT increase and US President Donald Trump mulls a 100% tariff on foreign films
Jaime Carey speaks about the benefits of his tax background, DEI values, the use of AI for a smarter legal practice, and other priorities that will define his presidency
Historically low levels of attrition over consecutive years made a ‘difficult decision’ necessary, PwC has reportedly said
WTS Global is also vetting new potential member firms in Algeria, Cote D’Ivoire and Benin, Kelly Mgbor tells ITR in an exclusive interview
The scope of qualifying pillar two tax credits could reportedly be broadened; in other news, hundreds of IRS appeals staff are to resign
For many taxpayers, the prospect of long-term certainty that a bilateral APA offers can override concerns about time, cost and confidentiality
Levine, who served under the Joe Biden administration, led the US’s negotiations on the OECD’s two-pillar solution
Gift this article