IRS threatens to penalise Caterpillar over profits earned from Swiss subsidiary

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

IRS threatens to penalise Caterpillar over profits earned from Swiss subsidiary

After investigating Caterpillar’s US tax returns, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is threatening to tax profits the company earned from its Swiss based subsidiary (Caterpillar SARL). Caterpillar claims nothing untoward took place and plans to challenge the IRS through the appeals process.

The IRS has proposed to tax profits generated from transactions of mechanical parts by Caterpillar SARL after investigating Caterpillar’s US tax returns for 2007 and 2009. The tax increases and additional penalties are expected to amount to around $1 billion.

Caterpillar SARL is located in Geneva and has been selling machines, engines and replacement parts to non-US dealers for more than 50 years. According to spokeswoman, Rachel Potts, the subsidiary employs several hundred employees in Switzerland and other countries to deal with non-US markets.

Caterpillar plans to contest the IRS’s proposed penalties. The company said it was confident it had complied with tax laws applicable to the parts transactions and did not foresee “a significant increase or decrease” to its tax benefits in the next year.

In a previous TPWeek article, chief tax officer and director for global tax and trade at Caterpillar, Robin Beran, voiced concerns, not over allegations of profit shifting, but over whether the company would get caught up in the reporting of its transactions because of what governments are expecting.

It appears Beran was right to be concerned.

This is not the first time Caterpillar has been questioned over its tax policy and overseas profits. In April 2014, a Senate panel held a hearing focusing on Caterpillar’s decision in 1999 to run its global parts business from Switzerland with tax rates as low as four percent.

The IRS is also disallowing $125 million of foreign tax credits from financings unrelated to the Swiss subsidiary.

Bigger picture

Caterpillar is one of several multinational companies whose overseas profits and taxes are being questioned by the IRS.

This comes as no surprise in the global tax climate at present. Governments are eager to demonstrate they are actively tackling profit shifting as the OECD’s base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) deadline draws near.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

However, women in tax face greater career obstacles than their male counterparts, an exclusive ITR survey of more than 100 women tax leaders revealed
Under Jeff Soar’s leadership, WTS UK aims to scale to 100 partners within five years and challenge the big four
As the firm embarks on a major shakeup of its EMEA partnerships, some staff will be watching nervously
The buyout of Hucke and Associates continues Ryan’s streak of firm acquisitions; in other news, a UK appeal against VAT on private school fees was dismissed
Tax teams are responding to usual client demand in the region, albeit with increased working from home flexibility, local sources indicate
A 120-plus-day delay to refunds would cost taxpayers almost $3bn in additional interest, the Cato Institute warned; plus indirect tax updates from February
The Office for Budget Responsibility’s pessimistic pillar two forecast accompanied the UK chancellor’s muted Spring Statement, dubbed ‘as dull as possible’ by one adviser
Digital tax reform is dissolving the old ‘temporal buffer’, forcing systems, institutions, and professionals to adapt as real-time reporting reshapes governance, capability, and compliance
Our first instalment features analysis of Deloitte’s landmark EMEA merger, Donald Trump’s Supreme Court tariff showdown and Venezuela’s tax evolution
While some believe it could have a positive effect on the wider advisory landscape, others argue that HMRC’s ‘red tape’ exercise won’t deter bad actors
Gift this article