Korea introduces a customs advanced pricing agreement (APA) regime

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Korea introduces a customs advanced pricing agreement (APA) regime

as.jpg

TP Week correspondent DJ Yeo of Kim & Chang reports on the introduction of a new customs APA scheme

south-korean-flag.jpg

The Korean Customs Service (KCS) introduced the Advance Customs Valuation Arrangement (ACVA) on January 1. This is an APA regime for customs purposes under which the KCS can approve an importer’s transfer pricing method to determine the transaction value of goods purchased from its foreign related parties. The relevant KCS notice provides the details regarding the procedures and legal ramifications of an ACVA.

An ACVA applicant should file an application with the KCS that should include information and documents relating to the subject transfer pricing such as a supply agreement between the transactional parties, documents/analysis underlying the inter-company pricing, similar to an APA application for income tax purposes.

The KCS should complete its review of the ACVA application within one year from the filing date (this can be compared with a two-year processing period for a unilateral APA on the income tax side). During this review period, the applicant may file a provisional value of the goods at the time of import declaration and can thus avoid a penalty even if the finally approved terms of the ACVA differ from the terms proposed in the application.

Once approved, the ACVA will be effective for a period of three years during which the taxpayer will be protected from a customs audit. The taxpayer should, however, file an annual report indicating whether all approved terms of the ACVA and the critical assumptions underlying the AVCA are met. After the three-year period, the taxpayer may file a renewal application, which is expected to be simpler than the initial ACVA application/process.

ak.jpg

The ACVA was introduced to reduce disputes with taxpayers and provide them with certainty on customs duties. However, it remains to be seen how an approved ACVA obtained by an importer would be considered by the income tax authorities when they review the inter-company pricing for income tax purposes.



more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The event comes at an important moment for professionals dealing with practical realities related to this practice area
Germany’s dogmatic restriction of third-party investment in tax advisory firms will only serve to slow down innovation and access to justice
The Irish government has been told that it’s spending too much of its corporation tax receipts and should instead focus on running bigger surpluses; plus, the IRS is set to merge tax practitioner offices
A company risks double taxation, penalties and inquiry cost if it submits a form with anomalies under the new system, Asker Ali also tells ITR
Arindam Mitra and Robin Hart examine how aggregate TP rules clash with transaction-level customs rules, creating compliance risks and requiring granular, SKU-level pricing strategies
The scandal has come just three years after the PwC tax leaks controversy and has prompted KPMG’s Australian chief executive to resign
In the first of a two-part series on capital v revenue in R&D, Jayne Stokes explores these key concepts and where UK companies need to tread carefully
Magnus Pantzar is set to join as managing director after spending nearly a decade as EQT’s global head of tax
The OECD’s project was up for debate as Matt Williams spoke to ITR following BDO’s tax strategist survey, which uncovered increased complexity and costs among multinationals
The recent spree of firm mergers and acquisitions proves that geographic scale is the name of the game
Gift this article