International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Italian patent box regime becomes more accessible for R&D

Sponsored by


Enforced in 2015, the Italian patent box regime is an optional tax benefit allowing reduced tax for income arising from the direct or indirect use of IP assets by companies and commercial entities performing research and development activities.

It grants a 50% exemption from corporate income tax (i.e. IRES) and regional tax on productive activities (i.e. IRAP). It is characterised by a five-year lock-in period. The election is renewable, and its tax benefits include:

  1. Income deriving from the licence to third parties of intangibles;

  2. Direct use of the intangible; or

  3. Exemption of the gain deriving from the disposal of an IP, provided that at least 90% of the price received is re-invested within two years in new R&D activities. In cases where the intangible is exploited by the same company that performs the R&D activities, it has to identify an amount corresponding to the economic contribution that the intangible adds to the aggregate income by activating a formal negotiation with the Central Revenue (via the so-called 'international standard ruling procedure').

Recent amendments for direct use cases

Law Decree No. 34 (Growth Decree), which was published in the Official Gazette on April 30 2019, notes that companies which opt for the patent box regime are allowed (in cases of direct use) to determine by themselves and declare the eligible income, avoiding the preventive ruling procedure with the competent tax office.

Furthermore, those taxpayers that (i) decide to benefit from this simplification, (ii) prepare dedicated supporting documentation according to the specific regulations that will be issued by Central Revenue by the end of July 2019, and (iii) give communication of its possession to Revenue before the beginning of a tax audit on that fiscal year, will benefit from a penalty protection in case officers challenge the calculation of the patent box incentive.

The patent box benefit shall be split in three equal instalments. Worth noting is that this simplification can be exploited both by taxpayers that have already started the ruling procedure with the competent tax office and by those which made the application for previous fiscal years (up to 2018), but have not been convened by the officers yet.


The recently enforced provisions have a clear goal to boost support for companies engaged in R&D activities which have historically suffered from delays in negotiations due to the technicalities required for IP analysis, and the limited resources of the tax offices for valuations.

Even if relevant indications will come only from the Central Revenue guidelines at the end of July, strategic and operational implications have to be evaluated today.

Taxpayers who have not applied for the regime and those who have not completed the ruling procedure with the Italian tax authority have to decide between the old and new automatic patent box regime. The two possibilities have different implications and the choice should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.

Old patent box

The old patent box procedure (i.e. where companies decide to identify the amount of the tax relief by means of a preventive ruling), grants taxpayers the possibility of benefitting from a tax reduction previously agreed with the tax office, with limitations on potential litigation with the Central Revenue (practically confined to the verification of the correct implementation of the calculation mechanisms agreed during the ruling phase).

Going along the path of the preventive ruling would also imply making the downward adjustment, for the specific year it is related to, entirely in the pertaining tax return (instead of splitting it equally across three fiscal years).

New automatic patent box

In cases where the company chooses an automatic application of the patent box regime (i.e. self-liquidation of the relief), it would benefit from simplification in procedure (no ruling required) and timing.

Among others, the new procedure would be a crucial resource in terms of economic, as well as financial planning, especially in those situations where the IP contribution to the business has been remarkable in previous fiscal years and the relating patent box relief could highly impact on the current and following year. It is an option that could be suggested to those companies who can clearly identify the intangibles used and the attributable income.

Final remarks

Simplification measures for the patent box regime relies on a cooperative relationship between Central Revenue and the taxpayer. The latter is requested to adopt a proactive attitude when preparing advance, supporting documentation to satisfy all formal and substance requirements.

Considering the vast number of companies that may be attracted by patent box relief and simplified access, the way the tax offices will conduct tax inspections on this topic will be pivotal to evaluate an appeal in the medium to long-term.

Postponing checks during a tax audit (with limited time given by the law) may generate additional litigation.

Accordingly, supporting documentation will be unavoidable and will have to become part of the ordinary compliance work to manage a tax risk that may have a big impact on the financial and operational sides.

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The General Court reverses its position taken four years ago, while the UN discusses tax policy in New York.
Discussion on amount B under the first part of the OECD's two-pronged approach to international tax reform is far from over, if the latest consultation is anything go by.
Pillar two might be top of mind for many multinational companies, but the huge variations between countries’ readiness means getting ahead of the game now, argues Russell Gammon, chief solutions officer at Tax Systems.
ITR’s latest quarterly PDF is going live today, leading on the looming battle between the UN and the OECD for dominance in global tax policy.
Company tax changes are central to the German government’s plan to revive the economy, but sources say they miss the mark. Ralph Cunningham reports.
The winners of the ITR Americas Tax Awards have been announced for 2023!
There is a ‘huge demand’ for tax services in the Middle East, says new Clyde & Co partner Rachel Fox in an interview with ITR.
The ECB warns the tax could leave banks with weaker capital levels, while the UAE publishes guidance on its new corporate tax regime.
Caroline Setliffe and Ben Shem-Tov of Eversheds Sutherland give an overview of the US transfer pricing penalty regime and UK diverted profits tax considerations for multinational companies.
The result follows what EY said was one of the most successful years in the firm’s history.