Amendments to the act on the taxation of shareholders in CFCs

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Amendments to the act on the taxation of shareholders in CFCs

laaksonen.jpg

Sari Laaksonen

On June 6 2008, the Finnish government issued a bill to amend the controlled foreign companies (CFC) leg-islation. The amendments were ratified by the Finnish president on November 7 2008. The amendments narrow the scope of application of CFC legislation, and could also require reorganisation of company structures.

According to the bill, there will be amendments to the definition of a CFC entity, to the provisions concerning the determination of the amount of taxable CFC income, deduction of the losses of a CFC entity and foreign tax credit.

According to the bill, CFC legislation would not apply if:

  • the entity is resident in a member state of the European Economic Area or in a tax treaty partner state; and

  • the controlled entity is actually established in the host state and, objectively, carries out genuine economic activities there.

Exceptions apply to entities that are established in countries that either are on the black list provided by the ministry of finance or do not exchange appropriate information with the Finnish tax authorities.

An entity that resides in a state with which Finland has a tax treaty would not fall under the scope of application of the CFC regime if:

  • the tax burden under the general corporate tax system of that state is comparable to the corporate tax burden in Finland; and

  • the entity has not been subject to a special tax benefit in its state of residence.

If the two requirements are met, an entity in a tax treaty state is excluded from the scope of the CFC regime. However, general anti-abuse rules apply.

In addition, according to the bill, foreign permanent establishments in low tax jurisdictions are considered comparable to foreign legal entities. Thus, in some cases a permanent establishment of a foreign subsidiary could be regarded as a CFC entity even though the subsidiary itself would not meet the requirements for CFC status.

New CFC legislation will increase the interest level of individual shareholders from 10% to 25% so no CFC taxation would occur if the interest does not exceed 25%. The right to deduct the losses of a CFC will increase from five to ten tax years following the loss year. The share of the losses of a CFC cannot be deducted from any income other than future CFC income.

The new CFC legislation still leaves some issues, such as the determination of genuine economic activities and exceptions to some fields of activities open to interpretations.

According to the bill, a company carries on genuine economic activities if the company has adequate premises, equipment, and independent personnel in its home state. However, intra-group holding companies or financing companies, for example, do not normally require significant, constant presence. Thus, the situation will still be somewhat unclear, and holding structures must be considered and argued more carefully.

CFC legislation does not apply to profits that arise mostly from industrial production, other comparable production, or shipping business conducted in the entity's state of residence. The practice concerning granting line of business exemptions has become obsolete. No amendments were presented, however, even though there is a need for reform.

New CFC legislation is generally effective for fiscal years commencing on or after January 1 2009. However, there is a transitional period lasting until 2015 for permanent establishments already formed on December 31 2007 or before.

The amendments could affect the acceptable structures of Finnish-owned foreign entities. The need for restructuring should be considered to assure compliance with the new requirements.

Sari Laaksonen, (sari.laaksonen@castren.fi)

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The recent spree of firm mergers and acquisitions proves that geographic scale is the name of the game
The big four spin-off firm becomes Taxand’s second UK member; in other news, Haynes Boone launched a UK tax practice
Stephanie Pantelidaki’s economic expertise will give Norton Rose Fulbright’s other teams ‘extra firepower,’ she says
Mada has opened simultaneously in Paris and Dubai with an eight-lawyer team from Trinity International
PwC will continue to provide indirect tax services as part of the deal; in other news, the CJEU addressed the VAT treatment of TP adjustments
The arrival of Renan Ozturk and his team from A&M Tax introduces a unique proposition within the Middle East legal market, the firm said
The deal, reportedly worth $400m, will add Svalner Atlas’s 50-partner Nordic and Benelux presence to Ryan’s rapidly growing global footprint
The combined firm, which comprises over 1,400 lawyers, will boast robust tax practices in both the UK and US
Cascading tax reform, bullish foreign investment and vigorous TP audits have made Italy’s tax advisory market dynamic and stiffly competitive
As ITR data reveals that 2025 saw more than double the amount of private client hires than 2024, it seems firms are jostling for position
Gift this article