Thin capitalization rules reach Congress

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement


Thin capitalization rules reach Congress

The tax authorities have sent the Congress a tax bill including proposed legislation concerning additional interest deductibility restriction to be effected through a series of thin capitalization rules that would enter into force on January 1 2005.

According to the proposed bill, the tax authorities consider that certain parties have made use of debt operations as a way to improperly reduce their income tax base or to transfer tax profits or losses from one company to another or to low-tax jurisdictions.

To discourage those mechanisms and to ensure companies operate with reasonable equity-to-debt margins from both the tax and financial viewpoints, the tax authorities are proposing to disallow interest charges to a Mexican company on financing in excess of a 2:1 debt-to-equity ratio.

According to the proposed thin capitalization rules, a taxpayer is considered to have excess debt on the basis of the fixed 2:1 ratio test, to the extent the amount of average debt of the taxpayer (including the debt granted by non-related parties) exceeds two times the equity amount for tax purposes. This fixed ratio test, in fact, works as a safe harbour rule.

For that purpose, equity means the sum of capital contributions recognized for tax purposes and the after-tax profits of the borrower, both duly restated for inflation.

Additionally, provisions are established that make it possible to increase the debt-to-capital ratio, when companies need financing for expansion and improvements to their facilities. However, those debts must be reduced proportionally to the annual depreciation of the acquired fixed assets.

Companies belonging to the financial system will not be subject to these thin capitalization rules, since they are governed by separate specific legislation.

Lastly, a number of questions remain unanswered such as whether the rules apply to currency exchange losses, which are classified as interest for Mexican income tax purposes. It is expected that the proposed changes may be amended to clarify the current open issues.

Roberto del Toro (roberto.del.toro@mx.pwc.com)
Carlos Orel Martinez (carlos.orel.martinez@mx.pwc.com)

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The big four firm is rightfully prioritising transparency and accountability as it seeks to rebuild from its scandal, but a glaring structural issue remains
A recent hiring flurry has taken the firm’s number of partner appointments this year to 121 and put it on track to hit 160 partner target early
The move brings specialist tax and litigation capability to EY as it seeks to close the gap on Baker McKenzie and Venezuela’s leading local firms
The industry’s response to AI requires an unfamiliar ingredient as firms battle to shape their futures
The ambitious big four challenger firm has also appointed ex-RSM partner Brad Ashton to build out its customs and global trade practice
The big four firm allegedly reviewed backdated documents and signed off on accounts that removed hundreds of millions of dollars of Abramovich’s assets
New Tier 1 entrants and an expanding cohort of established players indicate that law firms are becoming increasingly credible challengers in Europe's TP market
Awards
Leading firms and individuals gathered in Dubai to celebrate standout legal, dealmaking and tax work across the region
Tax authorities want more revenue, have better tools to find it and are increasingly willing to fight for it
Audifina, the sixth-largest firm of its kind in Lithuania, will bring a 90-strong team with offices in Vilnius and Kaunas to RSM’s international platform
Gift this article