International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Sweden: Are non-Swedish pension funds discriminated under EU law when liable to Swedish withholding tax?



Erik Hultman

Niklas Cornelius

The European Court of Justice (ECJ) has in repeated rulings established that it is contrary to the free movement of capital to levy withholding tax (WHT) on dividends when dividend income received by a domestic comparable person/entity is not subject to a corresponding tax burden.

WHT reclaims filed by non-Swedish pension companies

A number of non-Swedish pension companies and pension funds have initiated court procedures in Sweden in order to reclaim Swedish WHT. The claims are based on the case law developed by the ECJ.

Under Swedish tax legislation, dividends to foreign pension companies and pension funds are subject to WHT on the gross amount, while Swedish pension institutions (life insurance companies and pension trusts) are in effect subject to a specific tax paid on a notionally calculated yield, based on the government interest borrowing rate and the value of the funds' assets, after a deduction of financial costs. As a result, the effective tax rate on dividends received by these resident pension institutions may from time to time be lower than the 15% withholding tax rate that is normally applied to non-resident pension funds. It is worth noting that according to Swedish legislation, non-resident pension companies and funds are subject to WHT on dividends. The domestic WHT rate amounts to 30%. It may generally be reduced to 15% or 10% under Swedish tax treaties.

It is clear that from an EU law perspective it should in principle be allowed for member states to use different techniques for taxation depending on the domicile of the taxpayer. It seems reasonable, however, to believe that this is only valid if the outcome is not discriminatory. The result of the different taxation techniques in Sweden for domestic and foreign pension institutions is, however, somewhat difficult to assess as it will vary from year to year and also depend on what the normal general interest rates should be considered to be.

Request by the European Commission

The European Commission has requested that Sweden amends its WHT legislation with respect to foreign pension funds. The last request, which took the form of an additional reasoned opinion (the second stage of an infringement procedure) was issued on March 22 2012. The Swedish Government has, however, defended the Swedish levying of WHT on dividends paid to foreign pension companies, arguing, inter alia, that the tax burden of Swedish domestic life insurance companies over a longer period of time, and under more normal general interest rates, can be expected to be at least as heavy as the WHT burden that non-Swedish pension funds are subject to.

Leave of appeal

The Swedish Supreme Administrative Court released notifications in June 2013 that it will grant leave of appeals for cases filed by a Finnish pension company and a Belgian pension fund, respectively.

The outcome of the cases should be of interest for many non-Swedish financial institutions whose Swedish equivalents are taxed on a notionally calculated yield, as favorable rulings may create WHT reclaim opportunities.

Erik Hultman (

Tel: +46 8 520 594 68

Niklas Cornelius (



more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

David Pickstone and Anastasia Nourescu of Stewarts review the facts and implications of Ørsted’s appeal at the Upper Tribunal.
The Internal Revenue Service will lose the funding as part of the US debt limit deal, while Amazon UK reaps the benefits of the 130% ‘super-deduction’.
The European Commission wanted to make an example of US companies like Apple, but its crusade against ‘sweetheart’ tax rulings may be derailed at the CJEU.
The OECD has announced that a TP training programme is about to conclude in West Africa, a region that has been plagued by mispricing activities for a number of years.
Richard Murphy and Andrew Baker make the case for tax transparency as a public good and how key principles should lead to a better tax system.
‘Go on leave, effective immediately’, PwC has told nine partners in the latest development in the firm’s ongoing tax scandal.
The forum heard that VAT professionals are struggling under new pressures to validate transactions and catch fraud, responsibilities that they say should lie with governments.
The working paper suggested a new framework for boosting effective carbon rates and reducing the inconsistency of climate policy.
UAE firm Virtuzone launches ‘TaxGPT’, claiming it is the first AI-powered tax tool, while the Australian police faces claims of a conflict of interest over its PwC audit contract.
The US technology company is defending its past Irish tax arrangements at the CJEU in a final showdown that could have major political repercussions.