Sweden: Are non-Swedish pension funds discriminated under EU law when liable to Swedish withholding tax?

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Sweden: Are non-Swedish pension funds discriminated under EU law when liable to Swedish withholding tax?

hultman.jpg

cornelius.jpg

Erik Hultman


Niklas Cornelius

The European Court of Justice (ECJ) has in repeated rulings established that it is contrary to the free movement of capital to levy withholding tax (WHT) on dividends when dividend income received by a domestic comparable person/entity is not subject to a corresponding tax burden.

WHT reclaims filed by non-Swedish pension companies

A number of non-Swedish pension companies and pension funds have initiated court procedures in Sweden in order to reclaim Swedish WHT. The claims are based on the case law developed by the ECJ.

Under Swedish tax legislation, dividends to foreign pension companies and pension funds are subject to WHT on the gross amount, while Swedish pension institutions (life insurance companies and pension trusts) are in effect subject to a specific tax paid on a notionally calculated yield, based on the government interest borrowing rate and the value of the funds' assets, after a deduction of financial costs. As a result, the effective tax rate on dividends received by these resident pension institutions may from time to time be lower than the 15% withholding tax rate that is normally applied to non-resident pension funds. It is worth noting that according to Swedish legislation, non-resident pension companies and funds are subject to WHT on dividends. The domestic WHT rate amounts to 30%. It may generally be reduced to 15% or 10% under Swedish tax treaties.

It is clear that from an EU law perspective it should in principle be allowed for member states to use different techniques for taxation depending on the domicile of the taxpayer. It seems reasonable, however, to believe that this is only valid if the outcome is not discriminatory. The result of the different taxation techniques in Sweden for domestic and foreign pension institutions is, however, somewhat difficult to assess as it will vary from year to year and also depend on what the normal general interest rates should be considered to be.

Request by the European Commission

The European Commission has requested that Sweden amends its WHT legislation with respect to foreign pension funds. The last request, which took the form of an additional reasoned opinion (the second stage of an infringement procedure) was issued on March 22 2012. The Swedish Government has, however, defended the Swedish levying of WHT on dividends paid to foreign pension companies, arguing, inter alia, that the tax burden of Swedish domestic life insurance companies over a longer period of time, and under more normal general interest rates, can be expected to be at least as heavy as the WHT burden that non-Swedish pension funds are subject to.

Leave of appeal

The Swedish Supreme Administrative Court released notifications in June 2013 that it will grant leave of appeals for cases filed by a Finnish pension company and a Belgian pension fund, respectively.

The outcome of the cases should be of interest for many non-Swedish financial institutions whose Swedish equivalents are taxed on a notionally calculated yield, as favorable rulings may create WHT reclaim opportunities.

Erik Hultman (erik.hultman@se.ey.com)

Tel: +46 8 520 594 68

Niklas Cornelius (niklas.cornelius@se.ey.com)

EY

Website: www.ey.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The threat of 50% tariffs on Brazilian goods coincides with new Brazilian legal powers to adopt retaliatory economic measures, local experts tell ITR
The country’s chancellor appears to have backtracked from previous pillar two scepticism; in other news, Donald Trump threatened Russia with 100% tariffs
In its latest G20 update, the OECD also revealed tense discussions with the US where the ‘significant threat’ of Section 899 was highlighted
The tax agency has increased compliance yield from wealthy individuals but cannot identify how much tax is paid by UK billionaires, the committee also claimed
Saffery cautioned that documentation requirements in new government proposals must be limited if medium-sized companies are not exempted from TP
The global minimum tax deal is not viable without US participation, Friedrich Merz has argued
Section 899 of the ‘one big beautiful’ bill would have spelled disaster for many international investors into the US, but following its shelving, attention turns to the fate of the OECD’s pillars
DLA Piper’s co-head of tax for the US and Latin America tells ITR about her fervent belief in equal access to the law, loving yoga, and paternal inspirations
Tax expert Craig Hillier agrees with the comparison of pillar two to using a sledgehammer to crack a nut
The amount is reported to be up 57% from the £5.6bn that the UK tax agency believes was underpaid in the previous year
Gift this article