Montenegro: Increase in VAT rate

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Montenegro: Increase in VAT rate

zivkovic.jpg

Jelena Zivkovic

Due to a significant budget deficit, in June 2013 the Montenegrin government and Parliament adopted VAT law amendments under which the standard VAT rate will be increased from 17% to 19%. It is expected that the amendments will be in place as of July 1 2013.

Despite the opposing political parties, the Labour Union and the civil sector, all raising strong concerns that an increase in VAT will have a large negative impact on citizens and on business development in Montenegro, the coalition of ruling parties voted for the changes.

With this VAT rate increase, the government expects to collect an additional €40 million ($52.5 million) of revenue.

Within the same law changes package, an amendment that regulates the use of the additional revenue was adopted. Under this amendment, 70% of collected revenue will be used for development programmes of Northern Montenegro, which is recognised as the most underdeveloped part of the country.

Reduced VAT rate (7%) remains the same. Under current VAT legislation, the reduced VAT rate of 7% applies to basic goods for human consumption (bread, milk, flour, dairy products, infant foods, grease, oil, meat and sugar), medical drugs, books, teaching materials, accommodation services in hotels, motels and hostels, water, daily news and public communal services.

Even with the increased VAT rate, Montenegro maintains the lowest rate among other countries in the region (Slovenia 20%, Croatia 25%, Serbia 20%, Bulgaria 20%, Greece 23%, Italy 21%, Hungary 27%, Romania 24%).

Jelena Zivkovic (jelena.zivkovic@eurofast.eu)

Eurofast Global, Podgorica Office, Montenegro

Tel: +382 20 228 490

Website: www.eurofast.eu

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Advisers who do not register for the new regime in time could be prevented from interacting with HMRC, the tax authority said
Valid pillar two objectives are still intact after the side-by-side agreement, but whether the framework is now settled is ‘a $64,000 question’, Morrison Foerster’s tax chair told ITR
Ian Halligan previously led Baker Tilly’s international tax services in the US
Exclusive ITR data emphasises that DEI does not affect in-house buying decisions – and it’s nothing to do with the US president
The firms made senior hires in Los Angeles and Cleveland respectively; in other news, South Korea reported an 11% rise in tax income, fuelled by a corporation tax boom
The ‘deeply flawed’ report is attempting to derail UN tax convention debates, the Tax Justice Network’s CEO said
Salim Rahim, a TP specialist, had been a partner at Baker McKenzie since 2010
While the manual should be consulted for any questions around MAPs, the OECD’s Sriram Govind also emphasised that the guidance is ‘not a political commitment’
The landmark Indian Supreme Court judgment redefines GAAR, JAAR and treaty safeguards, rejects protections for indirect transfers and tightens conditions for Mauritius‑based investors claiming DTAA relief
The expansion introduces ‘business-level digital capabilities’ for tax professionals, the US tax agency said
Gift this article