International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Tim Cook and Eric Schmidt

Apple CEO and Google Executive Chairman

Tim Cook and Eric Schmidt

Similarly to fellow Global Tax 50 joint-entrants Max Baucus and Dave Camp, the two heads of Apple and Google have advanced the US tax reform debate in their own way. By standing firmly committed to the legitimacy of their companies’ tax practices, advocating instead for the rules they maintain they play within to be changed to match the realities of the modern world, the two men have cast a new light on the reform debate.

Through their efforts, the focus has shifted somewhat away from corporate tax practices and onto those that make the laws for companies to abide by.

In April, Schmidt defended Google’s tax policy after the company’s US stock market results showed it generated more than £3 billion ($4.6 billion) in the UK last year, but paid only £7 million in UK corporation tax.

“The most important thing to say about our taxes is that we fully comply with the law and obviously, should the law change, we will comply with that as well,” said Schmidt. “What we are doing is legal. I’m rather perplexed by this debate, which has been going on in the UK for some time, because I view taxes as not optional. I view that you pay the taxes that are legally required. It’s not a debate; you pay the taxes.”

Defences such as this have served to increase the strength of feeling that existing tax rules need to be changed, and has shifted the emphasis onto the responsibilities of lawmakers.

Cook, meanwhile, towed a similar line at his May appearance in front of the Senate’s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, chaired by fellow Global Tax 50 member, Carl Levin.

His defence of Apple’s taxes was purposeful and unapologetic.

“We pay all the taxes we owe, every single dollar. We not only comply with the laws, but we comply with the spirit of the laws,” Cook said, before refuting Levin’s claim that Apple depends on “tax gimmicks”.

The defence seemed to convince most of the senators present, with many actually jumping to Apple’s defence themselves. Senator Rand Paul provided a particularly alliterative argument in defence of Cook: “I am offended by the tone and tenor of this hearing. I am offended by a $4 trillion government bullying, berating and badgering one of America’s greatest success stories.”

Cook used the hearing to call for an evaluation of the US tax system, which he said has not kept pace with the advent of the digital age and the rapidly changing global economy.

But despite Cook’s May appearance on the Senate floor, Apple’s use of Ireland in its tax structuring affairs has also piqued the interest of the Italian tax authorities, who have launched an investigation into an alleged €1 billion ($1.3 billion) fraud by the company.

Regardless of the outcome in that investigation, Cook and Apple have succeeded in changing the tone and tenor of the tax reform debate, especially in the US.

Together with Google’s Schmidt, Cook has done this so successfully that Rand Paul has even gone as far as saying: “If anyone should be on trial here it should be Congress [for creating such a complex tax code]”.

Further reading

Perceived avoiders declare support for tax reform

Google defends tax policy

Baucus US tax reform proposal: A warning for Apple and Google

US tax reform: The long and winding road

The Global Tax 50 2013

« Previous

Pierre Collin and Nicolas Colin

View the complete list

Next »

Marlies de Ruiter

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The forum heard that VAT professionals are struggling under new pressures to validate transactions and catch fraud, responsibilities that they say should lie with governments.
The working paper suggested a new framework for boosting effective carbon rates and reducing the inconsistency of climate policy.
UAE firm Virtuzone launches ‘TaxGPT’, claiming it is the first AI-powered tax tool, while the Australian police faces claims of a conflict of interest over its PwC audit contract.
The US technology company is defending its past Irish tax arrangements at the CJEU in a final showdown that could have major political repercussions.
ITR’s Indirect Tax Forum heard that Italy’s VAT investigation into Meta has the potential to set new and expensive tax principles that would likely be adopted around the world
Police are now investigating the leak of confidential tax information by a former PwC partner at the request of the Australian government.
A VAT policy officer at the European Commission told the forum that the initial deadline set for EU convergence of domestic digital VAT reporting is likely to be extended.
The UK government shows little sign of cutting corporate tax, while a growing number of businesses report a decline in investment as a result of the higher tax burden.
Mariana Morais Teixeira of Morais Leitão overviews Portugal’s new tax incentive regime designed to boost the country’s capital-depleted private sector.
Septian Fachrizal, TP analyst at the Directorate General of Taxes, outlines how Indonesia is relying heavily on the successful implementation of pillar one.