European Union: EU Commission proposes amendments to Parent-Subsidiary Directive to tackle PPLs and introduce common GAAR

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

European Union: EU Commission proposes amendments to Parent-Subsidiary Directive to tackle PPLs and introduce common GAAR

van-der-made.jpg

douma.jpg

Bob van der Made


Sjoerd Douma

On November 25 2013, the European Commission (EC) proposed amendments to the Parent-Subsidiary Directive (PSD) in the context of the fight against tax fraud and evasion and aggressive tax planning/BEPS in the EU. The proposal seeks to tackle hybrid financial mismatches within the scope of application of the PSD and to introduce a general anti-abuse rule (GAAR) to protect the functioning of the directive. The proposal follows the political guidance agreed in 2009 within the EU's Code of Conduct Group on business taxation to avoid the distorting effects of mismatches resulting from differences in the tax treatment of hybrid loans (PPLs) between EU member states. The proposal allows this political guidance to be implemented in domestic tax law. If the EC's proposal is adopted by the EU member states, Article 4(1)(a) of the PSD would provide that where a parent company, by virtue of its association with its subsidiary, receives distributed profits, the member state of the parent company shall refrain from taxing such profits to the extent that such profits are not deductible by the subsidiary of the parent company.

The EC also proposes to replace the current anti-abuse provision in the PSD by inserting a common GAAR, based on the similar clause included in its December 6 2012 ATP Recommendation.

The main amendments in short:

  • PSD shall not preclude the application of domestic or agreement-based provisions regarding tax evasion;

  • EU member states shall withdraw the benefit of PSD in the case of an artificial arrangement or an artificial series of arrangements put into place for the essential purpose of obtaining an improper tax advantage under the PSD and which defeats the object, spirit and purpose of the tax provisions invoked;

  • A transaction, scheme, action, operation, agreement, understanding, promise, or undertaking is an artificial arrangement or a part of an artificial series of arrangements where it does not reflect economic reality;

  • In determining the artificiality, EU member states shall ascertain whether one or more of the following situations are involved:

    1. the legal characterisation of the individual steps which an arrangement consists of is inconsistent with the legal substance of the arrangement as a whole;

    2. the arrangement is carried out in a manner not ordinarily used in a reasonable business conduct;

    3. the arrangement includes elements having the effect of offsetting or cancelling each other;

    4. the transactions concluded are circular in nature; and

    5. the arrangement results in a significant tax benefit which is not reflected in the business risks undertaken by the taxpayer.

  • Member states shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive by 31 December 2014.

Bob van der Made (bob.van.der.made@nl.pwc.com) and Sjoerd Douma (sjoerd.douma@nl.pwc.com), Brussels and Amsterdam

PwC EU Direct Tax Group

Tel: +31 88 792 3696

Website: www.pwc.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

AI-powered tax agents are likely to be the next big development in tax technology, says Russell Gammon of Tax Systems
FTI Consulting’s EMEA head of employment tax and reward tells ITR about celebrating diversity in the profession, his love of musicals, and what makes tax cool
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney and US President Donald Trump have agreed that the countries will look to conclude a deal by July 21, 2025
The firm’s lack of transparency regarding its tax leaks scandal should see the ban extended beyond June 30, senators Deborah O’Neill and Barbara Pocock tell ITR
Despite posing significant administrative hurdles, digital services taxes remain ‘the best way forward’ for emerging economies, says Neil Kelley, COO of Ascoria
A ‘joint understanding’ among G7 countries that ‘defends American interests’ is set to be announced, Scott Bessent claimed
The ‘big four’ firm’s inaugural annual report unveiled a sharp drop in profits for 2024; in other news, Baker McKenzie and Perkins Coie expanded their US tax benches
Representatives from the two countries focused on TP as they met this week to evaluate progress under a previously signed agreement – it is understood
The UK accountancy firm’s transfer pricing lead tells ITR about his expat lifestyle, taking risks, and what makes tax cool
Dolphin Drilling intends to discuss the final liability amount and manner of settlement with HM Revenue and Customs
Gift this article