India: Eligibility of German limited partnership for treaty benefits

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

India: Eligibility of German limited partnership for treaty benefits

nayak.jpg

jain.jpg

Rajendra Nayak


Aastha Jain

Tax treatment of hybrid or fiscally transparent entities has always been a contentious issue when it concerns the issue of availing benefits of a tax treaty in India. The Bombay High Court (HC) recently ruled, in the case of the Chiron Bearing Gmbh & Co (taxpayer) [TS-12-HC-2013(BOM)], on the eligibility of a German limited partnership (LP) to claim tax benefits under the India-Germany tax treaty.

The taxpayer offered to tax its income in the nature of royalty and fees for technical services (FTS) from India at a lower rate of 10% by invoking the treaty. Under the treaty, a person who is a resident of one or both of the contracting states can claim the benefits. A resident is defined under the treaty to mean a person which is liable to tax in a state by virtue of its domicile. Further, "person" includes any entity treated as a taxable unit in Germany.

Under the German tax laws, the taxpayer was treated as a fiscally transparent entity and its income was taxed in the hands of its partners. However, it was liable to pay "trade tax" in Germany, a tax levied on its profits. Further, the taxpayer held a tax residence certificate (TRC) issued by the German authorities certifying that the taxpayer was liable to pay trade tax in Germany.

The HC observed that trade tax paid in Germany is one of the taxes covered under Article 2 of the treaty and the taxpayer is filing trade tax returns in Germany. Hence, the taxpayer is paying tax to which the treaty applies. Furthermore, the TRC issued by the German Authorities evidences the fact that the taxpayer is considered as a taxable unit under the taxation laws of Germany.

The HC held that the taxpayer was entitled to treaty benefits and the lower withholding tax rate applicable to royalty and FTS under the treaty cannot be denied. Reliance placed by the Indian Tax Authority on OECD publications to deny treaty benefits was not sustained as the entire issue was specifically governed by the treaty.

Rajendra Nayak (rajendra.nayak@in.ey.com) & Aastha Jain (aastha.jain@in.ey.com)

Ernst & Young

Tel: +91 80 4027 5275

Website : www.ey.com/india

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

HMRC’s push for unified tax adviser registration won’t prevent every instance of improper conduct, but it is good for taxpayers and the UK’s reputation
Elsewhere, the UAE’s tax office has issued an update on registration penalties and two firms have been busy making lateral hires
The case sits within a context of Brazil signalling that it is replacing informal discretion and ambiguity with structures that reward analytical rigour, one expert tells ITR
Jeff Soar lifts the lid on WTS UK’s ambitious recruitment plans, the firm's positioning against the big four, and why tax is the perfect profession for AI
The move reinforces Milan’s role as a key European hub for international business, the firm said
Australia’s government has also announced that it will implement the pillar two side-by-side agreement
Sara Morgan is due to join Joseph Hage Aaronson & Bremen as a partner in London, ITR understands
The newly combined tax team has already worked on thousands of joint client matters, leaders from McDermott Will & Schulte tell ITR
As AI becomes increasingly intuitive and idiot-proof, its tax applicability is becoming impossible to overstate
New data on public CbCR showed uneven adoption, as Singapore advanced pillar two compliance and firms expanded their tax capabilities
Gift this article