All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws. © 2022 ITR is part of the Euromoney Institutional Investor PLC group.

COMMENT: The importance of the tax contribution from British business

fotoflexer-photorichardwoolhouse.jpg

Some recent press coverage in the UK could suggest that business spends its time doing everything it can to dodge every tax it owes. The facts show how far from the truth this is.

Businesses contribute more than a quarter of all tax revenues and underpin virtually all taxes. They paid around £163 billion ($216 billion) in tax (corporation and other taxes) in 2010-2011 - a quarter of the total tax take, roughly equal to the combined health, education and police budgets.

Businesses also collect a large amount of tax on behalf of the government, such as income tax through PAYE [pay as you earn]. Virtually all taxes, such as income tax, employees’ national insurance contributions and VAT depend on the successful operation of business.

The fact that many of the world’s largest multinational companies are based in the UK significantly boosts our economy. In fact, corporation tax revenues here are dominated by the multinational groups, whether UK or foreign-owned (42% and 45% respectively). Tax revenues from multinational corporations are essential to economic growth and to support our public services.

However, how much tax multinationals are or should be paying in the UK must not be considered purely in the context of national borders.

Global nature of business

The way business operates has changed dramatically over the last couple of decades. Multinational corporations are now truly global with groups organised around the world. When competing for investment from multinational groups, the UK must resist the temptation to claim taxes that may belong somewhere else by acting unilaterally. This would risk:

· undermining our competitiveness:

· causing tension with other countries; and

· having a detrimental effect on the UK’s economy.

Instead, the government needs to collaborate internationally to achieve a consistent approach to how taxing rights should be allocated globally. And with a substantial amount of world trade occurring inside multinational groups, getting transfer pricing rules right internationally should be the UK’s number one goal.

Transfer pricing complexity

The purpose of transfer pricing rules is, of course, to ensure that companies within a group that transfer goods or provide services to other companies within the same group pay a price which is based on the arm’s-length principle.

This ensures that as far as possible profits earned in different jurisdictions reflect a multinational’s business operations. More importantly, the rules also determine how international transactions within a group must be priced to ensure each country receives an appropriate share of tax.

fotoflexer-photooecdlogo2012.jpg

However, any multinational group’s tax department knows that transfer pricing is inherently complex. For example, it can be difficult to compare pricing of transactions between companies in a multinational group and those between unrelated parties. As seen in the recent OECD’s consultation, transfer pricing of intangibles such as intellectual property is even more challenging. That’s why both taxpayers and tax administrators often name transfer pricing as the leading source of tax risk.

International coordination is the only way to go

Not surprisingly, and rightly so, one of the OECD’s top priorities for the next few years continues to be transfer pricing, and in particular how to address intangibles. Reaching consensus on different aspects of transfer pricing and then developing and implementing a consistent and manageable set of guidelines is not a quick and easy task. But in a world where business is truly global, this is the only way to go.

The UK should be at the forefront of actively encouraging such international cooperation. This is our best bet to achieve a system which is consistent, gives certainty to businesses and, importantly, ensures that the UK receives its fair share of tax.

Richard Woolhouse, Confederation of British Industry’s head of tax and fiscal policy

























more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The UN may be set to assume a global role in tax policy that would rival the OECD, while automakers lobby the US to change its tax rules on Chinese materials.
Companies including Valentino and EveryMatrix say the early adoption of EU public CbCR rules could boost transparency of local and foreign MNEs, despite the short notice.
ITR invites tax firms, in-house teams, and tax professionals to make submissions for the 2023 ITR Tax Awards in Asia-Pacific, Europe Middle East & Africa, and the Americas.
Tax authorities and customs are failing multinationals by creating uncertainty with contradictory assessment and guidance, say in-house tax directors.
The CJEU said the General Court erred in law when it ruled that both companies benefitted from Italian state aid.
An OECD report reveals multinationals have continued to shift profits to low-tax jurisdictions, reinforcing the case for strong multilateral action in response.
The UK government announced plans to increase taxes on oil and gas profits, while the Irish government considers its next move on tax reform.
War and COVID have highlighted companies’ unpreparedness to deal with sudden geo-political changes, say TP specialists.
A source who has seen the draft law said it brings clarity on intangibles and other areas of TP including tax planning.
Tax consultants say companies must not ignore financial transactions in their TP policies as authorities, particularly in the UK, become more demanding.