International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Finland: Finnish government considers new tax incentives

In October 2011, major Finnish trade unions and employers’ organisations agreed on the conditions of a new framework agreement. To support the tendencies of both parties, the Finnish government made suggestions regarding amendments in corporate and individual taxation.

The intention of the government was both to support the competitiveness of the Finnish industry and to improve employment and purchasing power. The suggestions were made in addition to the recent government’s Bill relating to the budget for 2012, suggesting several changes in different tax areas. It has already been suggested that the Finnish corporate income tax rate be decreased to 25% as of the beginning of 2012. Now the Finnish government has suggested a further decrease of 0.5%, which would reduce the corporate income tax rate to 24.5% from the start of next year. Personal income taxation will be less to compensate for the rise in employee pension payments. The government would also cancel the suggested increases in unemployment insurance contribution rates.

To support companies operating in energy-intensive branches, the government suggested the energy taxation be lowered by the implementation of an energy tax cutter at the beginning of 2012. In addition to that, the government announced it would conduct research relating to the possibility of implementing a R&D tax incentive system or a tax incentive system for start-up companies. The objective of the government is to implement the tax incentive system in the beginning of 2013.

The suggestions made by the Finnish government are provisional; the realisation of which depends on the budget and labour negotiations. Possible changes in Finnish tax legislation may enter into force at the beginning of 2012.

Janne Juusela (

Borenius – Taxand

Tel: +358 9 615 333


more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Sandy Markwick, head of the Tax Director Network (TDN) at Winmark, looks at the challenges of global mobility for tax management.
Taxpayers should look beyond the headline criteria of the simplification regime to ensure that their arrangements meet the arm’s-length standard, say Alejandro Ces and Mark Seddon of the EY New Zealand transfer pricing team.
In a recent webinar hosted by law firms Greenberg Traurig and Clayton Utz, officials at the IRS and ATO outlined their visions for 2023.
The Asia-Pacific awards research cycle has now begun – don’t miss on this opportunity be recognised in 2023
An intense period of lobbying and persuasion is under way as the UN secretary-general’s report on the future of international tax cooperation begins to take shape. Ralph Cunningham reports.
Fresh details of the European Commission’s state aid case against Amazon emerge, while a pension fund is suing Amgen over its tax dispute with the Internal Revenue Service.
The OECD’s rules may be impossible for businesses to manage, according to tax experts from companies including Shell.
Sanjay Sangvhi and Sahil Sheth of Khaitan & Co explore this legal concept and its implications for companies doing business in India.
The UK government is now committed to replacing the ‘super-deduction’ with a 100% capital allowances regime to offset the impact of the corporate tax rise to 25%.
Corporate tax is set to rise in the UK for the first time in decades, but the headline rate remains historically low despite what many observers think.