Brad Rolph of Charles River Associates in Canada takes a closer look at the memorandum of understanding (MOU) on arbitration between the US and Canada and the accompanying arbitration board operating guidelines. He also examines whether the arbitration procedure is accomplishing its objectives to reduce the amount of time it takes to resolve double taxation cases and increase the use of principle-based negotiating positions.
Unlock this content.
The content you are trying to view is exclusive to our subscribers.
The political optics of the US’s carve-out deal are poor, but as the Fair Tax Foundation’s Paul Monaghan writes, it preserves pillar two’s guiding ethos
The big four firm reportedly sent ‘threatening’ correspondence to Unity Advisory over its hiring of ex-PwC partners; plus tax recruitment news from the week
Multinationals face rising TP scrutiny as global rules diverge. As Daniel Moalusi argues, strong, consistent documentation is now essential to minimise audit risk and protect tax positions