Finland looks to limit the deductibility of interest
International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Finland looks to limit the deductibility of interest


The Finnish government has released a draft bill to limit the deductibility of interest expenses in corporate taxation. The goal of the proposed regulation is to secure Finland's tax base and to balance competition between domestic and foreign groups of companies


Janne Juusela

Interest expenses are widely deductible in business taxation and only applying the transfer pricing regulation or the general provision for tax avoidance can restrict deductibility. Applying the new proposed limitation will not require any intention of tax avoidance or deviation from the arm's-length principle, but it will be applicable as a general rule. According to the draft, limitations would be applicable to corporations, partnerships, corresponding foreign entities and their permanent establishments in Finland. The limitations would be applied only if the interest expenses exceed the interest income received by the company, as in if the company has net interest expenses.

Interest paid to a related party would become non-deductible if the net interest expenses exceed 30% of the company's EBITDA. In the proposed regulation, group contributions would be included in EBITDA.

The related parties are defined similarly as in the Finnish transfer pricing regulation. This means that parties are deemed to be related, if the other party has directly or indirectly control over the other.

Also interest paid to a third party could be regarded as a related party interest in situations such as back-to-back arrangements or when a related party has secured a third party loan with a collateral. Applying limitations in these indirect situations would require a connection between the interest paid to the third party by the debtor and the collateral given to the third party by the related party.

According to the draft, a general safe haven of always deductible €500,000 ($650,000) would apply. This amount would include all interest expenses, whether paid to related parties or not.

The proposed regulation would allow an indefinite carry forward of non-deductible interest expenses. The use of the interest carried forward would require unused EBITDA in the fiscal year of use. Change of ownership would not affect the possibility to carry non-deductible interest expenses forward.

Janne Juusela (

Borenius – Taxand

Tel: +358 9 615 333


more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The full list of finalists has been revealed and the winners will be presented on June 20 at the Metropolitan Club in New York
The ‘big four’ firm has threatened to legally pursue those behind the letter, which has been circulating on social media
The guidelines have been established in the wake of multiple tax scandals and controversies that have rocked the accounting profession
KPMG Netherlands’ former head of assurance also received a permanent bar and $150,000 fine; in other news, asset management firm BlackRock lost a $13.5bn UK tax appeal
The new, fully integrated office will also offer M&A, dispute resolution, IP and corporate tax services
The new guidance concerns a recent 1% excise tax on the repurchases of corporate stock for both US and certain foreign companies
Interpath has hired a managing partner from rival accounting firm BDO to lead the new operation
Survey results of over 28,000 in-house lawyers reveal that American in-house counsel place a higher value on the reputation of external advisers than their peers elsewhere
In an exclusive interview with ITR, Andrew Leigh also endorsed new legislation designed to prevent multinationals using complex corporate structures to reduce taxes
Nick Crama and Parwesh Bissumbhar, senior director and manager respectively at Alvarez & Marsal, outline practical advice for real estate managers to comply with DAC6 regulations
Gift this article